Cargando…

Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the repeatability and safety of measuring impulse oscillation system (IOS) parameters and the point of wheezing during bronchoprovocation testing of preschool children. METHODS: Two sets of methacholine challenge were conducted in 36 asthma children. The test was discontinu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Sun Hee, Sheen, Youn Ho, Kim, Mi Ae, Baek, Ji Hyeon, Baek, Hey Sung, Lee, Seung Jin, Yoon, Jung Won, Rha, Yeong Ho, Han, Man Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9460190
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the repeatability and safety of measuring impulse oscillation system (IOS) parameters and the point of wheezing during bronchoprovocation testing of preschool children. METHODS: Two sets of methacholine challenge were conducted in 36 asthma children. The test was discontinued if there was a significant change in reactance (Xrs5) and resistance (Rrs5) at 5 Hz (Condition 1) or respiratory distress due to airway obstruction (Condition 2). The repeatability of PC(80)_Xrs5, PC(30)_Rrs5, and wheezing (PCw) was assessed. The changes in Z-scores and SD-indexes from prebaseline (before testing) to postbaseline (after bronchodilator) were determined. RESULTS: For PC(30)_Rrs5, PC(80)_Xrs5, and PCw for subjects, PC(80)_Xrs5 showed the highest repeatability. Fifteen of 70 tests met Condition 2. The changes from pre- and postbaseline values varied significantly for Rrs5 and Xrs5. Excluding subjects with Z-scores higher than 2SD, we were able to detect 97.1% of bronchial hyperresponsiveness during methacholine challenge based on the change in Rrs5 or Xrs5. A change in IOS parameters was associated with wheezing at all frequencies. CONCLUSION: Xrs5 and Rrs5 have repeatability comparable with FEV1, and Xrs5 is more reliable than Rrs5. Clinicians can safely perform a challenge test by measuring the changes in Rrs5, Xrs5, and Z-scores from the prebaseline values.