Cargando…

Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the repeatability and safety of measuring impulse oscillation system (IOS) parameters and the point of wheezing during bronchoprovocation testing of preschool children. METHODS: Two sets of methacholine challenge were conducted in 36 asthma children. The test was discontinu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Sun Hee, Sheen, Youn Ho, Kim, Mi Ae, Baek, Ji Hyeon, Baek, Hey Sung, Lee, Seung Jin, Yoon, Jung Won, Rha, Yeong Ho, Han, Man Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9460190
_version_ 1783249375960498176
author Choi, Sun Hee
Sheen, Youn Ho
Kim, Mi Ae
Baek, Ji Hyeon
Baek, Hey Sung
Lee, Seung Jin
Yoon, Jung Won
Rha, Yeong Ho
Han, Man Yong
author_facet Choi, Sun Hee
Sheen, Youn Ho
Kim, Mi Ae
Baek, Ji Hyeon
Baek, Hey Sung
Lee, Seung Jin
Yoon, Jung Won
Rha, Yeong Ho
Han, Man Yong
author_sort Choi, Sun Hee
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the repeatability and safety of measuring impulse oscillation system (IOS) parameters and the point of wheezing during bronchoprovocation testing of preschool children. METHODS: Two sets of methacholine challenge were conducted in 36 asthma children. The test was discontinued if there was a significant change in reactance (Xrs5) and resistance (Rrs5) at 5 Hz (Condition 1) or respiratory distress due to airway obstruction (Condition 2). The repeatability of PC(80)_Xrs5, PC(30)_Rrs5, and wheezing (PCw) was assessed. The changes in Z-scores and SD-indexes from prebaseline (before testing) to postbaseline (after bronchodilator) were determined. RESULTS: For PC(30)_Rrs5, PC(80)_Xrs5, and PCw for subjects, PC(80)_Xrs5 showed the highest repeatability. Fifteen of 70 tests met Condition 2. The changes from pre- and postbaseline values varied significantly for Rrs5 and Xrs5. Excluding subjects with Z-scores higher than 2SD, we were able to detect 97.1% of bronchial hyperresponsiveness during methacholine challenge based on the change in Rrs5 or Xrs5. A change in IOS parameters was associated with wheezing at all frequencies. CONCLUSION: Xrs5 and Rrs5 have repeatability comparable with FEV1, and Xrs5 is more reliable than Rrs5. Clinicians can safely perform a challenge test by measuring the changes in Rrs5, Xrs5, and Z-scores from the prebaseline values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5504923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55049232017-07-24 Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children Choi, Sun Hee Sheen, Youn Ho Kim, Mi Ae Baek, Ji Hyeon Baek, Hey Sung Lee, Seung Jin Yoon, Jung Won Rha, Yeong Ho Han, Man Yong Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the repeatability and safety of measuring impulse oscillation system (IOS) parameters and the point of wheezing during bronchoprovocation testing of preschool children. METHODS: Two sets of methacholine challenge were conducted in 36 asthma children. The test was discontinued if there was a significant change in reactance (Xrs5) and resistance (Rrs5) at 5 Hz (Condition 1) or respiratory distress due to airway obstruction (Condition 2). The repeatability of PC(80)_Xrs5, PC(30)_Rrs5, and wheezing (PCw) was assessed. The changes in Z-scores and SD-indexes from prebaseline (before testing) to postbaseline (after bronchodilator) were determined. RESULTS: For PC(30)_Rrs5, PC(80)_Xrs5, and PCw for subjects, PC(80)_Xrs5 showed the highest repeatability. Fifteen of 70 tests met Condition 2. The changes from pre- and postbaseline values varied significantly for Rrs5 and Xrs5. Excluding subjects with Z-scores higher than 2SD, we were able to detect 97.1% of bronchial hyperresponsiveness during methacholine challenge based on the change in Rrs5 or Xrs5. A change in IOS parameters was associated with wheezing at all frequencies. CONCLUSION: Xrs5 and Rrs5 have repeatability comparable with FEV1, and Xrs5 is more reliable than Rrs5. Clinicians can safely perform a challenge test by measuring the changes in Rrs5, Xrs5, and Z-scores from the prebaseline values. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5504923/ /pubmed/28740854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9460190 Text en Copyright © 2017 Sun Hee Choi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, Sun Hee
Sheen, Youn Ho
Kim, Mi Ae
Baek, Ji Hyeon
Baek, Hey Sung
Lee, Seung Jin
Yoon, Jung Won
Rha, Yeong Ho
Han, Man Yong
Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children
title Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children
title_full Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children
title_fullStr Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children
title_short Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children
title_sort clinical implications of oscillatory lung function during methacholine bronchoprovocation testing of preschool children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9460190
work_keys_str_mv AT choisunhee clinicalimplicationsofoscillatorylungfunctionduringmethacholinebronchoprovocationtestingofpreschoolchildren
AT sheenyounho clinicalimplicationsofoscillatorylungfunctionduringmethacholinebronchoprovocationtestingofpreschoolchildren
AT kimmiae clinicalimplicationsofoscillatorylungfunctionduringmethacholinebronchoprovocationtestingofpreschoolchildren
AT baekjihyeon clinicalimplicationsofoscillatorylungfunctionduringmethacholinebronchoprovocationtestingofpreschoolchildren
AT baekheysung clinicalimplicationsofoscillatorylungfunctionduringmethacholinebronchoprovocationtestingofpreschoolchildren
AT leeseungjin clinicalimplicationsofoscillatorylungfunctionduringmethacholinebronchoprovocationtestingofpreschoolchildren
AT yoonjungwon clinicalimplicationsofoscillatorylungfunctionduringmethacholinebronchoprovocationtestingofpreschoolchildren
AT rhayeongho clinicalimplicationsofoscillatorylungfunctionduringmethacholinebronchoprovocationtestingofpreschoolchildren
AT hanmanyong clinicalimplicationsofoscillatorylungfunctionduringmethacholinebronchoprovocationtestingofpreschoolchildren