Cargando…

Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography

BACKGROUND: Assessment of color disc photograph (C-DP) is affected by image quality, which decreases the ability to detect glaucoma. High-dynamic-range (HDR) imaging provides a greater range of luminosity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of ophthalmology residen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ittarat, Mantapond, Itthipanichpong, Rath, Manassakorn, Anita, Tantisevi, Visanee, Chansangpetch, Sunee, Rojanapongpun, Prin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8209270
_version_ 1783249382469009408
author Ittarat, Mantapond
Itthipanichpong, Rath
Manassakorn, Anita
Tantisevi, Visanee
Chansangpetch, Sunee
Rojanapongpun, Prin
author_facet Ittarat, Mantapond
Itthipanichpong, Rath
Manassakorn, Anita
Tantisevi, Visanee
Chansangpetch, Sunee
Rojanapongpun, Prin
author_sort Ittarat, Mantapond
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of color disc photograph (C-DP) is affected by image quality, which decreases the ability to detect glaucoma. High-dynamic-range (HDR) imaging provides a greater range of luminosity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of ophthalmology residents to detect glaucoma using HDR-concept disc photography (HDR-DP) compared to C-DP. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Twenty subjects were classified by 3 glaucoma specialists as either glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or control. All C-DPs were converted to HDR-DPs and randomly presented and assessed by 10 first-year ophthalmology residents. Sensitivity and specificity of glaucoma detection were compared. RESULTS: The mean ± SD of averaged retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was 74.0 ± 6.1 μm, 100.2 ± 9.6 μm, and 105.8 ± 17.2 μm for glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and controls, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of HDR-DP was higher than that of C-DP (87% versus 68%, mean difference: 19.0, 95% CI: 4.91 to 33.1; p = 0.014). Regarding diagnostic specificity, HDR-DP and C-DP yielded 46% and 75% (mean difference: 29.0, 95% CI: 13.4 to 44.6; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: HDR-DP statistically increased diagnostic sensitivity but not specificity. HDR-DP may be a screening tool for nonexpert ophthalmologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5504951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55049512017-07-24 Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography Ittarat, Mantapond Itthipanichpong, Rath Manassakorn, Anita Tantisevi, Visanee Chansangpetch, Sunee Rojanapongpun, Prin J Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of color disc photograph (C-DP) is affected by image quality, which decreases the ability to detect glaucoma. High-dynamic-range (HDR) imaging provides a greater range of luminosity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of ophthalmology residents to detect glaucoma using HDR-concept disc photography (HDR-DP) compared to C-DP. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Twenty subjects were classified by 3 glaucoma specialists as either glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or control. All C-DPs were converted to HDR-DPs and randomly presented and assessed by 10 first-year ophthalmology residents. Sensitivity and specificity of glaucoma detection were compared. RESULTS: The mean ± SD of averaged retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was 74.0 ± 6.1 μm, 100.2 ± 9.6 μm, and 105.8 ± 17.2 μm for glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and controls, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of HDR-DP was higher than that of C-DP (87% versus 68%, mean difference: 19.0, 95% CI: 4.91 to 33.1; p = 0.014). Regarding diagnostic specificity, HDR-DP and C-DP yielded 46% and 75% (mean difference: 29.0, 95% CI: 13.4 to 44.6; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: HDR-DP statistically increased diagnostic sensitivity but not specificity. HDR-DP may be a screening tool for nonexpert ophthalmologists. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5504951/ /pubmed/28740736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8209270 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mantapond Ittarat et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ittarat, Mantapond
Itthipanichpong, Rath
Manassakorn, Anita
Tantisevi, Visanee
Chansangpetch, Sunee
Rojanapongpun, Prin
Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography
title Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography
title_full Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography
title_fullStr Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography
title_full_unstemmed Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography
title_short Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography
title_sort capability of ophthalmology residents to detect glaucoma using high-dynamic-range concept versus color optic disc photography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8209270
work_keys_str_mv AT ittaratmantapond capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography
AT itthipanichpongrath capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography
AT manassakornanita capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography
AT tantisevivisanee capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography
AT chansangpetchsunee capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography
AT rojanapongpunprin capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography