Cargando…
Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography
BACKGROUND: Assessment of color disc photograph (C-DP) is affected by image quality, which decreases the ability to detect glaucoma. High-dynamic-range (HDR) imaging provides a greater range of luminosity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of ophthalmology residen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8209270 |
_version_ | 1783249382469009408 |
---|---|
author | Ittarat, Mantapond Itthipanichpong, Rath Manassakorn, Anita Tantisevi, Visanee Chansangpetch, Sunee Rojanapongpun, Prin |
author_facet | Ittarat, Mantapond Itthipanichpong, Rath Manassakorn, Anita Tantisevi, Visanee Chansangpetch, Sunee Rojanapongpun, Prin |
author_sort | Ittarat, Mantapond |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessment of color disc photograph (C-DP) is affected by image quality, which decreases the ability to detect glaucoma. High-dynamic-range (HDR) imaging provides a greater range of luminosity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of ophthalmology residents to detect glaucoma using HDR-concept disc photography (HDR-DP) compared to C-DP. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Twenty subjects were classified by 3 glaucoma specialists as either glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or control. All C-DPs were converted to HDR-DPs and randomly presented and assessed by 10 first-year ophthalmology residents. Sensitivity and specificity of glaucoma detection were compared. RESULTS: The mean ± SD of averaged retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was 74.0 ± 6.1 μm, 100.2 ± 9.6 μm, and 105.8 ± 17.2 μm for glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and controls, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of HDR-DP was higher than that of C-DP (87% versus 68%, mean difference: 19.0, 95% CI: 4.91 to 33.1; p = 0.014). Regarding diagnostic specificity, HDR-DP and C-DP yielded 46% and 75% (mean difference: 29.0, 95% CI: 13.4 to 44.6; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: HDR-DP statistically increased diagnostic sensitivity but not specificity. HDR-DP may be a screening tool for nonexpert ophthalmologists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5504951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55049512017-07-24 Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography Ittarat, Mantapond Itthipanichpong, Rath Manassakorn, Anita Tantisevi, Visanee Chansangpetch, Sunee Rojanapongpun, Prin J Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of color disc photograph (C-DP) is affected by image quality, which decreases the ability to detect glaucoma. High-dynamic-range (HDR) imaging provides a greater range of luminosity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of ophthalmology residents to detect glaucoma using HDR-concept disc photography (HDR-DP) compared to C-DP. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Twenty subjects were classified by 3 glaucoma specialists as either glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or control. All C-DPs were converted to HDR-DPs and randomly presented and assessed by 10 first-year ophthalmology residents. Sensitivity and specificity of glaucoma detection were compared. RESULTS: The mean ± SD of averaged retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was 74.0 ± 6.1 μm, 100.2 ± 9.6 μm, and 105.8 ± 17.2 μm for glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and controls, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of HDR-DP was higher than that of C-DP (87% versus 68%, mean difference: 19.0, 95% CI: 4.91 to 33.1; p = 0.014). Regarding diagnostic specificity, HDR-DP and C-DP yielded 46% and 75% (mean difference: 29.0, 95% CI: 13.4 to 44.6; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: HDR-DP statistically increased diagnostic sensitivity but not specificity. HDR-DP may be a screening tool for nonexpert ophthalmologists. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5504951/ /pubmed/28740736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8209270 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mantapond Ittarat et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ittarat, Mantapond Itthipanichpong, Rath Manassakorn, Anita Tantisevi, Visanee Chansangpetch, Sunee Rojanapongpun, Prin Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography |
title | Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography |
title_full | Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography |
title_fullStr | Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography |
title_full_unstemmed | Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography |
title_short | Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography |
title_sort | capability of ophthalmology residents to detect glaucoma using high-dynamic-range concept versus color optic disc photography |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8209270 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ittaratmantapond capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography AT itthipanichpongrath capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography AT manassakornanita capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography AT tantisevivisanee capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography AT chansangpetchsunee capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography AT rojanapongpunprin capabilityofophthalmologyresidentstodetectglaucomausinghighdynamicrangeconceptversuscoloropticdiscphotography |