Cargando…

World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)

In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. RF radiation was classified as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. Further e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hardell, Lennart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046
_version_ 1783249390337523712
author Hardell, Lennart
author_facet Hardell, Lennart
author_sort Hardell, Lennart
collection PubMed
description In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. RF radiation was classified as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. Further epidemiological, animal and mechanistic studies have strengthened the association. In spite of this, in most countries little or nothing has been done to reduce exposure and educate people on health hazards from RF radiation. On the contrary ambient levels have increased. In 2014 the WHO launched a draft of a Monograph on RF fields and health for public comments. It turned out that five of the six members of the Core Group in charge of the draft are affiliated with International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), an industry loyal NGO, and thus have a serious conflict of interest. Just as by ICNIRP, evaluation of non-thermal biological effects from RF radiation are dismissed as scientific evidence of adverse health effects in the Monograph. This has provoked many comments sent to the WHO. However, at a meeting on March 3, 2017 at the WHO Geneva office it was stated that the WHO has no intention to change the Core Group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5504984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55049842017-07-12 World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) Hardell, Lennart Int J Oncol Articles In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. RF radiation was classified as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. Further epidemiological, animal and mechanistic studies have strengthened the association. In spite of this, in most countries little or nothing has been done to reduce exposure and educate people on health hazards from RF radiation. On the contrary ambient levels have increased. In 2014 the WHO launched a draft of a Monograph on RF fields and health for public comments. It turned out that five of the six members of the Core Group in charge of the draft are affiliated with International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), an industry loyal NGO, and thus have a serious conflict of interest. Just as by ICNIRP, evaluation of non-thermal biological effects from RF radiation are dismissed as scientific evidence of adverse health effects in the Monograph. This has provoked many comments sent to the WHO. However, at a meeting on March 3, 2017 at the WHO Geneva office it was stated that the WHO has no intention to change the Core Group. D.A. Spandidos 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5504984/ /pubmed/28656257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046 Text en Copyright: © Hardell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Hardell, Lennart
World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)
title World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)
title_full World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)
title_fullStr World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)
title_full_unstemmed World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)
title_short World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)
title_sort world health organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (review)
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046
work_keys_str_mv AT hardelllennart worldhealthorganizationradiofrequencyradiationandhealthahardnuttocrackreview