Cargando…
World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)
In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. RF radiation was classified as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. Further e...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046 |
_version_ | 1783249390337523712 |
---|---|
author | Hardell, Lennart |
author_facet | Hardell, Lennart |
author_sort | Hardell, Lennart |
collection | PubMed |
description | In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. RF radiation was classified as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. Further epidemiological, animal and mechanistic studies have strengthened the association. In spite of this, in most countries little or nothing has been done to reduce exposure and educate people on health hazards from RF radiation. On the contrary ambient levels have increased. In 2014 the WHO launched a draft of a Monograph on RF fields and health for public comments. It turned out that five of the six members of the Core Group in charge of the draft are affiliated with International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), an industry loyal NGO, and thus have a serious conflict of interest. Just as by ICNIRP, evaluation of non-thermal biological effects from RF radiation are dismissed as scientific evidence of adverse health effects in the Monograph. This has provoked many comments sent to the WHO. However, at a meeting on March 3, 2017 at the WHO Geneva office it was stated that the WHO has no intention to change the Core Group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5504984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55049842017-07-12 World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) Hardell, Lennart Int J Oncol Articles In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. RF radiation was classified as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. Further epidemiological, animal and mechanistic studies have strengthened the association. In spite of this, in most countries little or nothing has been done to reduce exposure and educate people on health hazards from RF radiation. On the contrary ambient levels have increased. In 2014 the WHO launched a draft of a Monograph on RF fields and health for public comments. It turned out that five of the six members of the Core Group in charge of the draft are affiliated with International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), an industry loyal NGO, and thus have a serious conflict of interest. Just as by ICNIRP, evaluation of non-thermal biological effects from RF radiation are dismissed as scientific evidence of adverse health effects in the Monograph. This has provoked many comments sent to the WHO. However, at a meeting on March 3, 2017 at the WHO Geneva office it was stated that the WHO has no intention to change the Core Group. D.A. Spandidos 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5504984/ /pubmed/28656257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046 Text en Copyright: © Hardell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Hardell, Lennart World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) |
title | World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) |
title_full | World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) |
title_fullStr | World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) |
title_full_unstemmed | World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) |
title_short | World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) |
title_sort | world health organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (review) |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hardelllennart worldhealthorganizationradiofrequencyradiationandhealthahardnuttocrackreview |