Cargando…
E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors
BACKGROUND: E-learning—the use of Internet technologies to enhance knowledge and performance—has become a widely accepted instructional approach. Little is known about the current use of e-learning in postgraduate medical education. To determine utilization of e-learning by United States internal me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28697744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0953-9 |
_version_ | 1783249391064186880 |
---|---|
author | Wittich, Christopher M. Agrawal, Anoop Cook, David A. Halvorsen, Andrew J. Mandrekar, Jayawant N. Chaudhry, Saima Dupras, Denise M. Oxentenko, Amy S. Beckman, Thomas J. |
author_facet | Wittich, Christopher M. Agrawal, Anoop Cook, David A. Halvorsen, Andrew J. Mandrekar, Jayawant N. Chaudhry, Saima Dupras, Denise M. Oxentenko, Amy S. Beckman, Thomas J. |
author_sort | Wittich, Christopher M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: E-learning—the use of Internet technologies to enhance knowledge and performance—has become a widely accepted instructional approach. Little is known about the current use of e-learning in postgraduate medical education. To determine utilization of e-learning by United States internal medicine residency programs, program director (PD) perceptions of e-learning, and associations between e-learning use and residency program characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a national survey in collaboration with the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine of all United States internal medicine residency programs. RESULTS: Of the 368 PDs, 214 (58.2%) completed the e-learning survey. Use of synchronous e-learning at least sometimes, somewhat often, or very often was reported by 85 (39.7%); 153 programs (71.5%) use asynchronous e-learning at least sometimes, somewhat often, or very often. Most programs (168; 79%) do not have a budget to integrate e-learning. Mean (SD) scores for the PD perceptions of e-learning ranged from 3.01 (0.94) to 3.86 (0.72) on a 5-point scale. The odds of synchronous e-learning use were higher in programs with a budget for its implementation (odds ratio, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.04–8.7]; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Residency programs could be better resourced to integrate e-learning technologies. Asynchronous e-learning was used more than synchronous, which may be to accommodate busy resident schedules and duty-hour restrictions. PD perceptions of e-learning are relatively moderate and future research should determine whether PD reluctance to adopt e-learning is based on unawareness of the evidence, perceptions that e-learning is expensive, or judgments about value versus effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0953-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5504987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55049872017-07-12 E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors Wittich, Christopher M. Agrawal, Anoop Cook, David A. Halvorsen, Andrew J. Mandrekar, Jayawant N. Chaudhry, Saima Dupras, Denise M. Oxentenko, Amy S. Beckman, Thomas J. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: E-learning—the use of Internet technologies to enhance knowledge and performance—has become a widely accepted instructional approach. Little is known about the current use of e-learning in postgraduate medical education. To determine utilization of e-learning by United States internal medicine residency programs, program director (PD) perceptions of e-learning, and associations between e-learning use and residency program characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a national survey in collaboration with the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine of all United States internal medicine residency programs. RESULTS: Of the 368 PDs, 214 (58.2%) completed the e-learning survey. Use of synchronous e-learning at least sometimes, somewhat often, or very often was reported by 85 (39.7%); 153 programs (71.5%) use asynchronous e-learning at least sometimes, somewhat often, or very often. Most programs (168; 79%) do not have a budget to integrate e-learning. Mean (SD) scores for the PD perceptions of e-learning ranged from 3.01 (0.94) to 3.86 (0.72) on a 5-point scale. The odds of synchronous e-learning use were higher in programs with a budget for its implementation (odds ratio, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.04–8.7]; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Residency programs could be better resourced to integrate e-learning technologies. Asynchronous e-learning was used more than synchronous, which may be to accommodate busy resident schedules and duty-hour restrictions. PD perceptions of e-learning are relatively moderate and future research should determine whether PD reluctance to adopt e-learning is based on unawareness of the evidence, perceptions that e-learning is expensive, or judgments about value versus effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0953-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5504987/ /pubmed/28697744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0953-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wittich, Christopher M. Agrawal, Anoop Cook, David A. Halvorsen, Andrew J. Mandrekar, Jayawant N. Chaudhry, Saima Dupras, Denise M. Oxentenko, Amy S. Beckman, Thomas J. E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors |
title | E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors |
title_full | E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors |
title_fullStr | E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors |
title_full_unstemmed | E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors |
title_short | E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors |
title_sort | e-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28697744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0953-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wittichchristopherm elearningingraduatemedicaleducationsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT agrawalanoop elearningingraduatemedicaleducationsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT cookdavida elearningingraduatemedicaleducationsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT halvorsenandrewj elearningingraduatemedicaleducationsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT mandrekarjayawantn elearningingraduatemedicaleducationsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT chaudhrysaima elearningingraduatemedicaleducationsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT duprasdenisem elearningingraduatemedicaleducationsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT oxentenkoamys elearningingraduatemedicaleducationsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT beckmanthomasj elearningingraduatemedicaleducationsurveyofresidencyprogramdirectors |