Cargando…
The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations
BACKGROUND: Trust within organizations is important for ensuring members’ acceptance of the organization’s activities and to expand their scope of action. Remarkably, Patient Organizations (POs) that often both function as a forum for self-help and represent patients on the health-political level, h...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28697729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2368-z |
_version_ | 1783249423442116608 |
---|---|
author | Gerhards, Helene Jongsma, Karin Schicktanz, Silke |
author_facet | Gerhards, Helene Jongsma, Karin Schicktanz, Silke |
author_sort | Gerhards, Helene |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trust within organizations is important for ensuring members’ acceptance of the organization’s activities and to expand their scope of action. Remarkably, Patient Organizations (POs) that often both function as a forum for self-help and represent patients on the health-political level, have been understudied in this respect. This paper analyzes the relation between trust and representation in POs. We distinguish between two models of representation originating from political theory: the trustee and delegate model and between two types of trust: horizontal and vertical trust. METHODS: Our theoretical approach is illustrated with an analysis of 13 interviews with representatives of German POs. RESULTS: We have found that the delegate model requires horizontal trust and the trustee model vertical trust. Both models: horizontal/delegate and vertical/trustee exist within single POs. CONCLUSIONS: The representation process within POs demands a balancing act between inclusion of affected persons and strategically aggregating a clear-cut political claim. Trust plays in that process of coming from individual wishes to collective and political standpoints a major role both in terms of horizontal as well as vertical trust. Horizontal trust serves the communication between affected members, and vertical trust allows representatives to be decisive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5505133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55051332017-07-12 The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations Gerhards, Helene Jongsma, Karin Schicktanz, Silke BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Trust within organizations is important for ensuring members’ acceptance of the organization’s activities and to expand their scope of action. Remarkably, Patient Organizations (POs) that often both function as a forum for self-help and represent patients on the health-political level, have been understudied in this respect. This paper analyzes the relation between trust and representation in POs. We distinguish between two models of representation originating from political theory: the trustee and delegate model and between two types of trust: horizontal and vertical trust. METHODS: Our theoretical approach is illustrated with an analysis of 13 interviews with representatives of German POs. RESULTS: We have found that the delegate model requires horizontal trust and the trustee model vertical trust. Both models: horizontal/delegate and vertical/trustee exist within single POs. CONCLUSIONS: The representation process within POs demands a balancing act between inclusion of affected persons and strategically aggregating a clear-cut political claim. Trust plays in that process of coming from individual wishes to collective and political standpoints a major role both in terms of horizontal as well as vertical trust. Horizontal trust serves the communication between affected members, and vertical trust allows representatives to be decisive. BioMed Central 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5505133/ /pubmed/28697729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2368-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gerhards, Helene Jongsma, Karin Schicktanz, Silke The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations |
title | The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations |
title_full | The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations |
title_fullStr | The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations |
title_short | The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations |
title_sort | relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28697729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2368-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerhardshelene therelevanceofdifferenttrustmodelsforrepresentationinpatientorganizationsconceptualconsiderations AT jongsmakarin therelevanceofdifferenttrustmodelsforrepresentationinpatientorganizationsconceptualconsiderations AT schicktanzsilke therelevanceofdifferenttrustmodelsforrepresentationinpatientorganizationsconceptualconsiderations AT gerhardshelene relevanceofdifferenttrustmodelsforrepresentationinpatientorganizationsconceptualconsiderations AT jongsmakarin relevanceofdifferenttrustmodelsforrepresentationinpatientorganizationsconceptualconsiderations AT schicktanzsilke relevanceofdifferenttrustmodelsforrepresentationinpatientorganizationsconceptualconsiderations |