Cargando…
Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of visual feedback on rate of chest compressions, secondarily relating the forces used. DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Fifty trained hospital staff. INTERVENTIONS: A thin sensor-mat placed over the manikin's...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27831907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310691 |
_version_ | 1783249428173291520 |
---|---|
author | Gregson, Rachael Kathleen Cole, Tim James Skellett, Sophie Bagkeris, Emmanouil Welsby, Denise Peters, Mark John |
author_facet | Gregson, Rachael Kathleen Cole, Tim James Skellett, Sophie Bagkeris, Emmanouil Welsby, Denise Peters, Mark John |
author_sort | Gregson, Rachael Kathleen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of visual feedback on rate of chest compressions, secondarily relating the forces used. DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Fifty trained hospital staff. INTERVENTIONS: A thin sensor-mat placed over the manikin's chest measured rate and force. Rescuers applied compressions to the same paediatric manikin for two sessions. During one session they received visual feedback comparing their real-time rate with published guidelines. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: compression rate. Secondary: compression and residual forces. RESULTS: Rate of chest compressions (compressions per minute (compressions per minute; cpm)) varied widely (mean (SD) 111 (13), range 89–168), with a fourfold difference in variation during session 1 between those receiving and not receiving feedback (108 (5) vs 120 (20)). The interaction of session by feedback order was highly significant, indicating that this difference in mean rate between sessions was 14 cpm less (95% CI −22 to −5, p=0.002) in those given feedback first compared with those given it second. Compression force (N) varied widely (mean (SD) 306 (94); range 142–769). Those receiving feedback second (as opposed to first) used significantly lower force (adjusted mean difference −80 (95% CI −128 to −32), p=0.002). Mean residual force (18 N, SD 12, range 0–49) was unaffected by the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: While visual feedback restricted excessive compression rates to within the prescribed range, applied force remained widely variable. The forces required may differ with growth, but such variation treating one manikin is alarming. Feedback technologies additionally measuring force (effort) could help to standardise and define effective treatments throughout childhood. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5505152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55051522017-07-14 Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation Gregson, Rachael Kathleen Cole, Tim James Skellett, Sophie Bagkeris, Emmanouil Welsby, Denise Peters, Mark John Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of visual feedback on rate of chest compressions, secondarily relating the forces used. DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Fifty trained hospital staff. INTERVENTIONS: A thin sensor-mat placed over the manikin's chest measured rate and force. Rescuers applied compressions to the same paediatric manikin for two sessions. During one session they received visual feedback comparing their real-time rate with published guidelines. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: compression rate. Secondary: compression and residual forces. RESULTS: Rate of chest compressions (compressions per minute (compressions per minute; cpm)) varied widely (mean (SD) 111 (13), range 89–168), with a fourfold difference in variation during session 1 between those receiving and not receiving feedback (108 (5) vs 120 (20)). The interaction of session by feedback order was highly significant, indicating that this difference in mean rate between sessions was 14 cpm less (95% CI −22 to −5, p=0.002) in those given feedback first compared with those given it second. Compression force (N) varied widely (mean (SD) 306 (94); range 142–769). Those receiving feedback second (as opposed to first) used significantly lower force (adjusted mean difference −80 (95% CI −128 to −32), p=0.002). Mean residual force (18 N, SD 12, range 0–49) was unaffected by the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: While visual feedback restricted excessive compression rates to within the prescribed range, applied force remained widely variable. The forces required may differ with growth, but such variation treating one manikin is alarming. Feedback technologies additionally measuring force (effort) could help to standardise and define effective treatments throughout childhood. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-05 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5505152/ /pubmed/27831907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310691 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gregson, Rachael Kathleen Cole, Tim James Skellett, Sophie Bagkeris, Emmanouil Welsby, Denise Peters, Mark John Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title | Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_full | Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_fullStr | Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_short | Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_sort | randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27831907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310691 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gregsonrachaelkathleen randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT coletimjames randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT skellettsophie randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT bagkerisemmanouil randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT welsbydenise randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT petersmarkjohn randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation |