Cargando…

Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of visual feedback on rate of chest compressions, secondarily relating the forces used. DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Fifty trained hospital staff. INTERVENTIONS: A thin sensor-mat placed over the manikin's...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregson, Rachael Kathleen, Cole, Tim James, Skellett, Sophie, Bagkeris, Emmanouil, Welsby, Denise, Peters, Mark John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27831907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310691
_version_ 1783249428173291520
author Gregson, Rachael Kathleen
Cole, Tim James
Skellett, Sophie
Bagkeris, Emmanouil
Welsby, Denise
Peters, Mark John
author_facet Gregson, Rachael Kathleen
Cole, Tim James
Skellett, Sophie
Bagkeris, Emmanouil
Welsby, Denise
Peters, Mark John
author_sort Gregson, Rachael Kathleen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of visual feedback on rate of chest compressions, secondarily relating the forces used. DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Fifty trained hospital staff. INTERVENTIONS: A thin sensor-mat placed over the manikin's chest measured rate and force. Rescuers applied compressions to the same paediatric manikin for two sessions. During one session they received visual feedback comparing their real-time rate with published guidelines. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: compression rate. Secondary: compression and residual forces. RESULTS: Rate of chest compressions (compressions per minute (compressions per minute; cpm)) varied widely (mean (SD) 111 (13), range 89–168), with a fourfold difference in variation during session 1 between those receiving and not receiving feedback (108 (5) vs 120 (20)). The interaction of session by feedback order was highly significant, indicating that this difference in mean rate between sessions was 14 cpm less (95% CI −22 to −5, p=0.002) in those given feedback first compared with those given it second. Compression force (N) varied widely (mean (SD) 306 (94); range 142–769). Those receiving feedback second (as opposed to first) used significantly lower force (adjusted mean difference −80 (95% CI −128 to −32), p=0.002). Mean residual force (18 N, SD 12, range 0–49) was unaffected by the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: While visual feedback restricted excessive compression rates to within the prescribed range, applied force remained widely variable. The forces required may differ with growth, but such variation treating one manikin is alarming. Feedback technologies additionally measuring force (effort) could help to standardise and define effective treatments throughout childhood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5505152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55051522017-07-14 Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation Gregson, Rachael Kathleen Cole, Tim James Skellett, Sophie Bagkeris, Emmanouil Welsby, Denise Peters, Mark John Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of visual feedback on rate of chest compressions, secondarily relating the forces used. DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Fifty trained hospital staff. INTERVENTIONS: A thin sensor-mat placed over the manikin's chest measured rate and force. Rescuers applied compressions to the same paediatric manikin for two sessions. During one session they received visual feedback comparing their real-time rate with published guidelines. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: compression rate. Secondary: compression and residual forces. RESULTS: Rate of chest compressions (compressions per minute (compressions per minute; cpm)) varied widely (mean (SD) 111 (13), range 89–168), with a fourfold difference in variation during session 1 between those receiving and not receiving feedback (108 (5) vs 120 (20)). The interaction of session by feedback order was highly significant, indicating that this difference in mean rate between sessions was 14 cpm less (95% CI −22 to −5, p=0.002) in those given feedback first compared with those given it second. Compression force (N) varied widely (mean (SD) 306 (94); range 142–769). Those receiving feedback second (as opposed to first) used significantly lower force (adjusted mean difference −80 (95% CI −128 to −32), p=0.002). Mean residual force (18 N, SD 12, range 0–49) was unaffected by the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: While visual feedback restricted excessive compression rates to within the prescribed range, applied force remained widely variable. The forces required may differ with growth, but such variation treating one manikin is alarming. Feedback technologies additionally measuring force (effort) could help to standardise and define effective treatments throughout childhood. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-05 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5505152/ /pubmed/27831907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310691 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Gregson, Rachael Kathleen
Cole, Tim James
Skellett, Sophie
Bagkeris, Emmanouil
Welsby, Denise
Peters, Mark John
Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_full Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_fullStr Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_full_unstemmed Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_short Randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_sort randomised crossover trial of rate feedback and force during chest compressions for paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27831907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310691
work_keys_str_mv AT gregsonrachaelkathleen randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT coletimjames randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT skellettsophie randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT bagkerisemmanouil randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT welsbydenise randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT petersmarkjohn randomisedcrossovertrialofratefeedbackandforceduringchestcompressionsforpaediatriccardiopulmonaryresuscitation