Cargando…

Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant for local anesthetics in regional anesthesia, but the optimal route of administration is controversial. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of perineural versus intravenous dexamet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Wen-Ling, Ou, Xiao-Feng, Liu, Jin, Zhang, Wen-Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740419
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S138212
_version_ 1783249430631153664
author Zhao, Wen-Ling
Ou, Xiao-Feng
Liu, Jin
Zhang, Wen-Sheng
author_facet Zhao, Wen-Ling
Ou, Xiao-Feng
Liu, Jin
Zhang, Wen-Sheng
author_sort Zhao, Wen-Ling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant for local anesthetics in regional anesthesia, but the optimal route of administration is controversial. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone on local anesthetic regional nerve-blockade outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline (through PubMed), Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Biosis Previews databases were systematically searched (published from inception of each database to January 1, 2017) to identify randomized controlled trials. The data of the selected trials were statistically analyzed to find any significant differences between the two modalities. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included duration of motor block, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative analgesic dose at 24 hours. We conducted a planned subgroup analysis to compare the effects between adding epinephrine or not. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria of our analysis, with a total of 749 patients. Without the addition of epinephrine, the effects of perineural and intravenous dexamethasone were equivalent concerning the duration of analgesia (mean difference 0.03 hours, 95% CI –0.17 to 0.24). However, with the addition of epinephrine, the analgesic duration of perineural dexamethasone versus intravenous dexamethasone was prolonged (mean difference 3.96 hours, 95% CI 2.66–5.27). Likewise, the impact of epinephrine was the same on the duration of motor block. The two routes of administration did not show any significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nor on postoperative analgesic consumption at 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Our results show that perineural dexamethasone can prolong the effects of analgesic duration when compared to the intravenous route, only when epinephrine is coadministered. Without epinephrine, the two modalities show equivalent effect as adjuvants on regional anesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5505162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55051622017-07-24 Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhao, Wen-Ling Ou, Xiao-Feng Liu, Jin Zhang, Wen-Sheng J Pain Res Review BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant for local anesthetics in regional anesthesia, but the optimal route of administration is controversial. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone on local anesthetic regional nerve-blockade outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline (through PubMed), Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Biosis Previews databases were systematically searched (published from inception of each database to January 1, 2017) to identify randomized controlled trials. The data of the selected trials were statistically analyzed to find any significant differences between the two modalities. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included duration of motor block, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative analgesic dose at 24 hours. We conducted a planned subgroup analysis to compare the effects between adding epinephrine or not. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria of our analysis, with a total of 749 patients. Without the addition of epinephrine, the effects of perineural and intravenous dexamethasone were equivalent concerning the duration of analgesia (mean difference 0.03 hours, 95% CI –0.17 to 0.24). However, with the addition of epinephrine, the analgesic duration of perineural dexamethasone versus intravenous dexamethasone was prolonged (mean difference 3.96 hours, 95% CI 2.66–5.27). Likewise, the impact of epinephrine was the same on the duration of motor block. The two routes of administration did not show any significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nor on postoperative analgesic consumption at 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Our results show that perineural dexamethasone can prolong the effects of analgesic duration when compared to the intravenous route, only when epinephrine is coadministered. Without epinephrine, the two modalities show equivalent effect as adjuvants on regional anesthesia. Dove Medical Press 2017-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5505162/ /pubmed/28740419 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S138212 Text en © 2017 Zhao et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Zhao, Wen-Ling
Ou, Xiao-Feng
Liu, Jin
Zhang, Wen-Sheng
Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740419
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S138212
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaowenling perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ouxiaofeng perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujin perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangwensheng perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis