Cargando…
Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant for local anesthetics in regional anesthesia, but the optimal route of administration is controversial. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of perineural versus intravenous dexamet...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740419 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S138212 |
_version_ | 1783249430631153664 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Wen-Ling Ou, Xiao-Feng Liu, Jin Zhang, Wen-Sheng |
author_facet | Zhao, Wen-Ling Ou, Xiao-Feng Liu, Jin Zhang, Wen-Sheng |
author_sort | Zhao, Wen-Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant for local anesthetics in regional anesthesia, but the optimal route of administration is controversial. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone on local anesthetic regional nerve-blockade outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline (through PubMed), Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Biosis Previews databases were systematically searched (published from inception of each database to January 1, 2017) to identify randomized controlled trials. The data of the selected trials were statistically analyzed to find any significant differences between the two modalities. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included duration of motor block, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative analgesic dose at 24 hours. We conducted a planned subgroup analysis to compare the effects between adding epinephrine or not. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria of our analysis, with a total of 749 patients. Without the addition of epinephrine, the effects of perineural and intravenous dexamethasone were equivalent concerning the duration of analgesia (mean difference 0.03 hours, 95% CI –0.17 to 0.24). However, with the addition of epinephrine, the analgesic duration of perineural dexamethasone versus intravenous dexamethasone was prolonged (mean difference 3.96 hours, 95% CI 2.66–5.27). Likewise, the impact of epinephrine was the same on the duration of motor block. The two routes of administration did not show any significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nor on postoperative analgesic consumption at 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Our results show that perineural dexamethasone can prolong the effects of analgesic duration when compared to the intravenous route, only when epinephrine is coadministered. Without epinephrine, the two modalities show equivalent effect as adjuvants on regional anesthesia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5505162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55051622017-07-24 Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhao, Wen-Ling Ou, Xiao-Feng Liu, Jin Zhang, Wen-Sheng J Pain Res Review BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant for local anesthetics in regional anesthesia, but the optimal route of administration is controversial. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone on local anesthetic regional nerve-blockade outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline (through PubMed), Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Biosis Previews databases were systematically searched (published from inception of each database to January 1, 2017) to identify randomized controlled trials. The data of the selected trials were statistically analyzed to find any significant differences between the two modalities. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included duration of motor block, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative analgesic dose at 24 hours. We conducted a planned subgroup analysis to compare the effects between adding epinephrine or not. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria of our analysis, with a total of 749 patients. Without the addition of epinephrine, the effects of perineural and intravenous dexamethasone were equivalent concerning the duration of analgesia (mean difference 0.03 hours, 95% CI –0.17 to 0.24). However, with the addition of epinephrine, the analgesic duration of perineural dexamethasone versus intravenous dexamethasone was prolonged (mean difference 3.96 hours, 95% CI 2.66–5.27). Likewise, the impact of epinephrine was the same on the duration of motor block. The two routes of administration did not show any significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nor on postoperative analgesic consumption at 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Our results show that perineural dexamethasone can prolong the effects of analgesic duration when compared to the intravenous route, only when epinephrine is coadministered. Without epinephrine, the two modalities show equivalent effect as adjuvants on regional anesthesia. Dove Medical Press 2017-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5505162/ /pubmed/28740419 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S138212 Text en © 2017 Zhao et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Zhao, Wen-Ling Ou, Xiao-Feng Liu, Jin Zhang, Wen-Sheng Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740419 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S138212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaowenling perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ouxiaofeng perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liujin perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangwensheng perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |