Cargando…

Acoustic ranging in poison frogs—it is not about signal amplitude alone

ABSTRACT: Acoustic ranging allows identifying the distance of a sound source and mediates inter-individual spacing and aggression in territorial species. Birds and mammals are known to use more complex cues than only sound pressure level (SPL), which can be influenced by the signaller and signal tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ringler, Max, Szipl, Georgine, Hödl, Walter, Khil, Leander, Kofler, Barbara, Lonauer, Michael, Provin, Christina, Ringler, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2340-2
_version_ 1783249575768752128
author Ringler, Max
Szipl, Georgine
Hödl, Walter
Khil, Leander
Kofler, Barbara
Lonauer, Michael
Provin, Christina
Ringler, Eva
author_facet Ringler, Max
Szipl, Georgine
Hödl, Walter
Khil, Leander
Kofler, Barbara
Lonauer, Michael
Provin, Christina
Ringler, Eva
author_sort Ringler, Max
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Acoustic ranging allows identifying the distance of a sound source and mediates inter-individual spacing and aggression in territorial species. Birds and mammals are known to use more complex cues than only sound pressure level (SPL), which can be influenced by the signaller and signal transmission in non-predictable ways and thus is not reliable by itself. For frogs, only SPL is currently known to mediate inter-individual distances, but we hypothesise that the strong territoriality of Dendrobatids could make the use of complex cues for ranging highly beneficial for this family. Therefore, we tested the ranging abilities of territorial males of Allobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Aromobatinae) in playback trials, using amplitude-normalized signals that were naturally degraded over distance, and synthetic signals that were masked with different levels of noise. Frogs responded significantly less to signals recorded from larger distances, regardless of SPL and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), but showed no differential response to natural minimum and maximum SNRs across the typical communication range in wild populations. This indicates that frogs used signal amplitude and SNR only as ancillary cues when assessing the distance of sound sources and relied instead mainly on more complex cues, such as spectral degradation or reverberation. We suggest that this ability mediates territorial spacing and mate choice in A. femoralis. Good ranging abilities might also play a role in the remarkable orientation performance of this species, probably by enabling the establishment of a mental acoustic map of the habitat. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Acoustic ranging allows the distance of vocalizing competitors and mates to be identified. While birds and mammals are known to use complex cues such as temporal degradation, frequency-dependent attenuation and reverberation for ranging, previous research indicated that frogs rely only on signal amplitude (sound pressure level) to assess the distance of other callers. The present study shows for the first time that also poison frogs can make use of more complex cues, an ability which is likely to be highly beneficial in their territorial social organization and probably can also be used for orientation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00265-017-2340-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5506510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55065102017-07-28 Acoustic ranging in poison frogs—it is not about signal amplitude alone Ringler, Max Szipl, Georgine Hödl, Walter Khil, Leander Kofler, Barbara Lonauer, Michael Provin, Christina Ringler, Eva Behav Ecol Sociobiol Original Article ABSTRACT: Acoustic ranging allows identifying the distance of a sound source and mediates inter-individual spacing and aggression in territorial species. Birds and mammals are known to use more complex cues than only sound pressure level (SPL), which can be influenced by the signaller and signal transmission in non-predictable ways and thus is not reliable by itself. For frogs, only SPL is currently known to mediate inter-individual distances, but we hypothesise that the strong territoriality of Dendrobatids could make the use of complex cues for ranging highly beneficial for this family. Therefore, we tested the ranging abilities of territorial males of Allobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Aromobatinae) in playback trials, using amplitude-normalized signals that were naturally degraded over distance, and synthetic signals that were masked with different levels of noise. Frogs responded significantly less to signals recorded from larger distances, regardless of SPL and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), but showed no differential response to natural minimum and maximum SNRs across the typical communication range in wild populations. This indicates that frogs used signal amplitude and SNR only as ancillary cues when assessing the distance of sound sources and relied instead mainly on more complex cues, such as spectral degradation or reverberation. We suggest that this ability mediates territorial spacing and mate choice in A. femoralis. Good ranging abilities might also play a role in the remarkable orientation performance of this species, probably by enabling the establishment of a mental acoustic map of the habitat. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Acoustic ranging allows the distance of vocalizing competitors and mates to be identified. While birds and mammals are known to use complex cues such as temporal degradation, frequency-dependent attenuation and reverberation for ranging, previous research indicated that frogs rely only on signal amplitude (sound pressure level) to assess the distance of other callers. The present study shows for the first time that also poison frogs can make use of more complex cues, an ability which is likely to be highly beneficial in their territorial social organization and probably can also be used for orientation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00265-017-2340-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-07-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5506510/ /pubmed/28757679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2340-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ringler, Max
Szipl, Georgine
Hödl, Walter
Khil, Leander
Kofler, Barbara
Lonauer, Michael
Provin, Christina
Ringler, Eva
Acoustic ranging in poison frogs—it is not about signal amplitude alone
title Acoustic ranging in poison frogs—it is not about signal amplitude alone
title_full Acoustic ranging in poison frogs—it is not about signal amplitude alone
title_fullStr Acoustic ranging in poison frogs—it is not about signal amplitude alone
title_full_unstemmed Acoustic ranging in poison frogs—it is not about signal amplitude alone
title_short Acoustic ranging in poison frogs—it is not about signal amplitude alone
title_sort acoustic ranging in poison frogs—it is not about signal amplitude alone
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2340-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ringlermax acousticranginginpoisonfrogsitisnotaboutsignalamplitudealone
AT sziplgeorgine acousticranginginpoisonfrogsitisnotaboutsignalamplitudealone
AT hodlwalter acousticranginginpoisonfrogsitisnotaboutsignalamplitudealone
AT khilleander acousticranginginpoisonfrogsitisnotaboutsignalamplitudealone
AT koflerbarbara acousticranginginpoisonfrogsitisnotaboutsignalamplitudealone
AT lonauermichael acousticranginginpoisonfrogsitisnotaboutsignalamplitudealone
AT provinchristina acousticranginginpoisonfrogsitisnotaboutsignalamplitudealone
AT ringlereva acousticranginginpoisonfrogsitisnotaboutsignalamplitudealone