Cargando…

Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey

BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a common skin cancer that poses a risk of metastasis. Clinical investigations into SCC treatment are common, but the outcomes reported are highly variable, omitted, or clinically irrelevant. The outcome heterogeneity and reporting bias of these studies le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlessinger, Daniel I., Iyengar, Sanjana, Yanes, Arianna F., Chiren, Sarah G., Godinez-Puig, Victoria, Chen, Brian R., Kurta, Anastasia O., Schmitt, Jochen, Deckert, Stefanie, Furlan, Karina C., Poon, Emily, Cartee, Todd V., Maher, Ian A., Alam, Murad, Sobanko, Joseph F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2069-2
_version_ 1783249595694841856
author Schlessinger, Daniel I.
Iyengar, Sanjana
Yanes, Arianna F.
Chiren, Sarah G.
Godinez-Puig, Victoria
Chen, Brian R.
Kurta, Anastasia O.
Schmitt, Jochen
Deckert, Stefanie
Furlan, Karina C.
Poon, Emily
Cartee, Todd V.
Maher, Ian A.
Alam, Murad
Sobanko, Joseph F.
author_facet Schlessinger, Daniel I.
Iyengar, Sanjana
Yanes, Arianna F.
Chiren, Sarah G.
Godinez-Puig, Victoria
Chen, Brian R.
Kurta, Anastasia O.
Schmitt, Jochen
Deckert, Stefanie
Furlan, Karina C.
Poon, Emily
Cartee, Todd V.
Maher, Ian A.
Alam, Murad
Sobanko, Joseph F.
author_sort Schlessinger, Daniel I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a common skin cancer that poses a risk of metastasis. Clinical investigations into SCC treatment are common, but the outcomes reported are highly variable, omitted, or clinically irrelevant. The outcome heterogeneity and reporting bias of these studies leave clinicians unable to accurately compare studies. Core outcome sets (COSs) are an agreed minimum set of outcomes recommended to be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a given condition or disease. Although COSs are under development for several dermatologic conditions, work has yet to be done to identify core outcomes specific for SCC. METHODS/DESIGN: Outcome extraction for COS generation will occur via four methods: (1) systematic literature review; (2) patient interviews; (3) other published sources; and (4) input from stakeholders in medicine, pharmacy, and other relevant industries. The list of outcomes will be revaluated by the Measuring PRiority Outcome Variables via Excellence in Dermatologic surgery (IMPROVED) Steering Committee. Delphi processes will be performed separately by expert clinicians and patients to condense the list of outcomes generated. A consensus meeting with relevant stakeholders will be conducted after the Delphi exercise to further select outcomes, taking into account participant scores. At the end of the meeting, members will vote and decide on a final recommended set of core outcomes. The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) organization and the Cochrane Skin Group - Core Outcome Set Initiative (CSG-COUSIN) will serve as advisers throughout the COS generation process. DISCUSSION: Comparison of clinical trials via systematic reviews and meta-analyses is facilitated when investigators study outcomes that are relevant and similar. The aim of this project is to develop a COS to guide use for future clinical trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2069-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5506611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55066112017-07-12 Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey Schlessinger, Daniel I. Iyengar, Sanjana Yanes, Arianna F. Chiren, Sarah G. Godinez-Puig, Victoria Chen, Brian R. Kurta, Anastasia O. Schmitt, Jochen Deckert, Stefanie Furlan, Karina C. Poon, Emily Cartee, Todd V. Maher, Ian A. Alam, Murad Sobanko, Joseph F. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a common skin cancer that poses a risk of metastasis. Clinical investigations into SCC treatment are common, but the outcomes reported are highly variable, omitted, or clinically irrelevant. The outcome heterogeneity and reporting bias of these studies leave clinicians unable to accurately compare studies. Core outcome sets (COSs) are an agreed minimum set of outcomes recommended to be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a given condition or disease. Although COSs are under development for several dermatologic conditions, work has yet to be done to identify core outcomes specific for SCC. METHODS/DESIGN: Outcome extraction for COS generation will occur via four methods: (1) systematic literature review; (2) patient interviews; (3) other published sources; and (4) input from stakeholders in medicine, pharmacy, and other relevant industries. The list of outcomes will be revaluated by the Measuring PRiority Outcome Variables via Excellence in Dermatologic surgery (IMPROVED) Steering Committee. Delphi processes will be performed separately by expert clinicians and patients to condense the list of outcomes generated. A consensus meeting with relevant stakeholders will be conducted after the Delphi exercise to further select outcomes, taking into account participant scores. At the end of the meeting, members will vote and decide on a final recommended set of core outcomes. The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) organization and the Cochrane Skin Group - Core Outcome Set Initiative (CSG-COUSIN) will serve as advisers throughout the COS generation process. DISCUSSION: Comparison of clinical trials via systematic reviews and meta-analyses is facilitated when investigators study outcomes that are relevant and similar. The aim of this project is to develop a COS to guide use for future clinical trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2069-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5506611/ /pubmed/28701207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2069-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Schlessinger, Daniel I.
Iyengar, Sanjana
Yanes, Arianna F.
Chiren, Sarah G.
Godinez-Puig, Victoria
Chen, Brian R.
Kurta, Anastasia O.
Schmitt, Jochen
Deckert, Stefanie
Furlan, Karina C.
Poon, Emily
Cartee, Todd V.
Maher, Ian A.
Alam, Murad
Sobanko, Joseph F.
Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
title Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
title_full Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
title_fullStr Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
title_full_unstemmed Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
title_short Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
title_sort development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a delphi survey
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2069-2
work_keys_str_mv AT schlessingerdanieli developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT iyengarsanjana developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT yanesariannaf developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT chirensarahg developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT godinezpuigvictoria developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT chenbrianr developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT kurtaanastasiao developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT schmittjochen developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT deckertstefanie developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT furlankarinac developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT poonemily developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT carteetoddv developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT maheriana developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT alammurad developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey
AT sobankojosephf developmentofacoreoutcomesetforclinicaltrialsinsquamouscellcarcinomastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandidentificationofacoreoutcomesetusingadelphisurvey