Cargando…
Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis
BACKGROUND: To assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of anterior chamber tap for the diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis on a population with high prevalence. METHODS: Retrospective, single centre, case series study. We reviewed all medical r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-017-0083-9 |
_version_ | 1783249611805163520 |
---|---|
author | Sjoholm-Gomez de Liano, Carl Soberon-Ventura, Vidal F. Salcedo-Villanueva, Guillermo Santos-Palacios, Abril Guerrero-Naranjo, Jose Luis Fromow-Guerra, Jans García-Aguirre, Gerardo Morales-Canton, Virgilio Velez-Montoya, Raul |
author_facet | Sjoholm-Gomez de Liano, Carl Soberon-Ventura, Vidal F. Salcedo-Villanueva, Guillermo Santos-Palacios, Abril Guerrero-Naranjo, Jose Luis Fromow-Guerra, Jans García-Aguirre, Gerardo Morales-Canton, Virgilio Velez-Montoya, Raul |
author_sort | Sjoholm-Gomez de Liano, Carl |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of anterior chamber tap for the diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis on a population with high prevalence. METHODS: Retrospective, single centre, case series study. We reviewed all medical records with clinical diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis in our hospital from January 1st, 2000 to December 31st 2014. From each record, we documented general demographic data, best corrected visual acuity and vitreous and aqueous tap microbiological results. All cases were further divided according to the endophthalmitis aetiology to perform individual calculations of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and prevalence. We used the results of the vitreous tap as the gold standard for diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis. We excluded those records in which the aqueous and vitreous samples were not taken simultaneously or had an incomplete microbiological report. Significance were assessed with chi squared statistics, with an alpha value of 0.05 for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 190 cases fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Positive culture rate from vitreous samples was 64.74%. Positive culture rate from aqueous sample was 32.11%. Bacteria isolated from aqueous samples matched those isolated from vitreous samples 78.68% of the time. The overall sensitivity was 38.21%, specificity: 75.51%, positive predictive value: 79.66%, negative predictive value: 32.74% (p = 0.08). Subgroup analysis showed that anterior chamber taps in cases of post-surgical endophthalmitis had a moderate to low sensitivity (37.73%), high specificity (93%) and high positive predictive value (95%) (p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of anterior chamber tap are low and should not be used for critical therapeutic decisions in patients with suspected bacterial endophthalmitis. In cases of post-surgical endophthalmitis, the result of an anterior chamber tap could be used for therapeutic guidance, but only in conjunction with clinical presentation and in the absence of a better method for diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5506679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55066792017-07-13 Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis Sjoholm-Gomez de Liano, Carl Soberon-Ventura, Vidal F. Salcedo-Villanueva, Guillermo Santos-Palacios, Abril Guerrero-Naranjo, Jose Luis Fromow-Guerra, Jans García-Aguirre, Gerardo Morales-Canton, Virgilio Velez-Montoya, Raul Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: To assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of anterior chamber tap for the diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis on a population with high prevalence. METHODS: Retrospective, single centre, case series study. We reviewed all medical records with clinical diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis in our hospital from January 1st, 2000 to December 31st 2014. From each record, we documented general demographic data, best corrected visual acuity and vitreous and aqueous tap microbiological results. All cases were further divided according to the endophthalmitis aetiology to perform individual calculations of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and prevalence. We used the results of the vitreous tap as the gold standard for diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis. We excluded those records in which the aqueous and vitreous samples were not taken simultaneously or had an incomplete microbiological report. Significance were assessed with chi squared statistics, with an alpha value of 0.05 for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 190 cases fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Positive culture rate from vitreous samples was 64.74%. Positive culture rate from aqueous sample was 32.11%. Bacteria isolated from aqueous samples matched those isolated from vitreous samples 78.68% of the time. The overall sensitivity was 38.21%, specificity: 75.51%, positive predictive value: 79.66%, negative predictive value: 32.74% (p = 0.08). Subgroup analysis showed that anterior chamber taps in cases of post-surgical endophthalmitis had a moderate to low sensitivity (37.73%), high specificity (93%) and high positive predictive value (95%) (p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of anterior chamber tap are low and should not be used for critical therapeutic decisions in patients with suspected bacterial endophthalmitis. In cases of post-surgical endophthalmitis, the result of an anterior chamber tap could be used for therapeutic guidance, but only in conjunction with clinical presentation and in the absence of a better method for diagnosis. BioMed Central 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5506679/ /pubmed/28706959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-017-0083-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Sjoholm-Gomez de Liano, Carl Soberon-Ventura, Vidal F. Salcedo-Villanueva, Guillermo Santos-Palacios, Abril Guerrero-Naranjo, Jose Luis Fromow-Guerra, Jans García-Aguirre, Gerardo Morales-Canton, Virgilio Velez-Montoya, Raul Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis |
title | Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis |
title_full | Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis |
title_short | Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis |
title_sort | sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of anterior chamber tap in cases of bacterial endophthalmitis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-017-0083-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sjoholmgomezdelianocarl sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofanteriorchambertapincasesofbacterialendophthalmitis AT soberonventuravidalf sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofanteriorchambertapincasesofbacterialendophthalmitis AT salcedovillanuevaguillermo sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofanteriorchambertapincasesofbacterialendophthalmitis AT santospalaciosabril sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofanteriorchambertapincasesofbacterialendophthalmitis AT guerreronaranjojoseluis sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofanteriorchambertapincasesofbacterialendophthalmitis AT fromowguerrajans sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofanteriorchambertapincasesofbacterialendophthalmitis AT garciaaguirregerardo sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofanteriorchambertapincasesofbacterialendophthalmitis AT moralescantonvirgilio sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofanteriorchambertapincasesofbacterialendophthalmitis AT velezmontoyaraul sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofanteriorchambertapincasesofbacterialendophthalmitis |