Cargando…

An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary

PURPOSE: To summarize the results of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)’s analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for endometrial cancer using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, outline areas of convergence and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Ellen, Beriwal, Sushil, Beyer, David, Chino, Junzo, Jhingran, Anuja, Lee, Larissa, Michalski, Jeff, Mundt, Arno J., Patton, Caroline, Petersen, Ivy, Portelance, Lorraine, Schwarz, Julie K., McCloskey, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28799571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2015.10.001
_version_ 1783249617016586240
author Jones, Ellen
Beriwal, Sushil
Beyer, David
Chino, Junzo
Jhingran, Anuja
Lee, Larissa
Michalski, Jeff
Mundt, Arno J.
Patton, Caroline
Petersen, Ivy
Portelance, Lorraine
Schwarz, Julie K.
McCloskey, Susan
author_facet Jones, Ellen
Beriwal, Sushil
Beyer, David
Chino, Junzo
Jhingran, Anuja
Lee, Larissa
Michalski, Jeff
Mundt, Arno J.
Patton, Caroline
Petersen, Ivy
Portelance, Lorraine
Schwarz, Julie K.
McCloskey, Susan
author_sort Jones, Ellen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To summarize the results of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)’s analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for endometrial cancer using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, outline areas of convergence and divergence with the 2014 ASTRO endometrial Guideline, and highlight where this analysis provides new information or perspective. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to combine available evidence with expert opinion. A comprehensive literature review was conducted and a multidisciplinary panel rated the appropriateness of RT options for different clinical scenarios. Treatments were categorized by the median rating as Appropriate, Uncertain, or Inappropriate. RESULTS: The ASTRO endometrial Guideline and this analysis using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method did not recommend adjuvant RT for early-stage, low-risk endometrioid cancers and largely agree regarding use of vaginal brachytherapy for low-intermediate and high-intermediate risk patients. For more advanced endometrioid cancer, chemotherapy with RT is supported by both documents. The Guideline and the RAND/UCLA analysis diverged regarding use of pelvic radiation. For stages II and III, this analysis rated external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy Appropriate, whereas the Guideline preferred external beam alone. In addition, this analysis offers insight on the role of histology, extent of nodal dissection, and para-aortic nodal irradiation; the use of intensity modulated RT; and management of stage IVA. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis based on the RAND/UCLA Method shows significant agreement with the 2014 endometrial Guideline. Areas of divergence, often in scenarios with low-level evidence, included use of external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy in stages II and III and external beam RT alone in early-stage patients. Furthermore, the analysis explores other important questions regarding management of this disease site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5506720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55067202017-07-24 An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary Jones, Ellen Beriwal, Sushil Beyer, David Chino, Junzo Jhingran, Anuja Lee, Larissa Michalski, Jeff Mundt, Arno J. Patton, Caroline Petersen, Ivy Portelance, Lorraine Schwarz, Julie K. McCloskey, Susan Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: To summarize the results of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)’s analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for endometrial cancer using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, outline areas of convergence and divergence with the 2014 ASTRO endometrial Guideline, and highlight where this analysis provides new information or perspective. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to combine available evidence with expert opinion. A comprehensive literature review was conducted and a multidisciplinary panel rated the appropriateness of RT options for different clinical scenarios. Treatments were categorized by the median rating as Appropriate, Uncertain, or Inappropriate. RESULTS: The ASTRO endometrial Guideline and this analysis using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method did not recommend adjuvant RT for early-stage, low-risk endometrioid cancers and largely agree regarding use of vaginal brachytherapy for low-intermediate and high-intermediate risk patients. For more advanced endometrioid cancer, chemotherapy with RT is supported by both documents. The Guideline and the RAND/UCLA analysis diverged regarding use of pelvic radiation. For stages II and III, this analysis rated external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy Appropriate, whereas the Guideline preferred external beam alone. In addition, this analysis offers insight on the role of histology, extent of nodal dissection, and para-aortic nodal irradiation; the use of intensity modulated RT; and management of stage IVA. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis based on the RAND/UCLA Method shows significant agreement with the 2014 endometrial Guideline. Areas of divergence, often in scenarios with low-level evidence, included use of external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy in stages II and III and external beam RT alone in early-stage patients. Furthermore, the analysis explores other important questions regarding management of this disease site. Elsevier 2015-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5506720/ /pubmed/28799571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2015.10.001 Text en © 2016 The Authors on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Jones, Ellen
Beriwal, Sushil
Beyer, David
Chino, Junzo
Jhingran, Anuja
Lee, Larissa
Michalski, Jeff
Mundt, Arno J.
Patton, Caroline
Petersen, Ivy
Portelance, Lorraine
Schwarz, Julie K.
McCloskey, Susan
An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary
title An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary
title_full An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary
title_fullStr An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary
title_short An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary
title_sort analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the rand/ucla appropriateness method: executive summary
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28799571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2015.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesellen ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT beriwalsushil ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT beyerdavid ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT chinojunzo ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT jhingrananuja ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT leelarissa ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT michalskijeff ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT mundtarnoj ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT pattoncaroline ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT petersenivy ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT portelancelorraine ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT schwarzjuliek ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT mccloskeysusan ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT jonesellen analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT beriwalsushil analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT beyerdavid analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT chinojunzo analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT jhingrananuja analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT leelarissa analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT michalskijeff analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT mundtarnoj analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT pattoncaroline analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT petersenivy analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT portelancelorraine analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT schwarzjuliek analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary
AT mccloskeysusan analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary