Cargando…
An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary
PURPOSE: To summarize the results of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)’s analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for endometrial cancer using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, outline areas of convergence and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28799571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2015.10.001 |
_version_ | 1783249617016586240 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Ellen Beriwal, Sushil Beyer, David Chino, Junzo Jhingran, Anuja Lee, Larissa Michalski, Jeff Mundt, Arno J. Patton, Caroline Petersen, Ivy Portelance, Lorraine Schwarz, Julie K. McCloskey, Susan |
author_facet | Jones, Ellen Beriwal, Sushil Beyer, David Chino, Junzo Jhingran, Anuja Lee, Larissa Michalski, Jeff Mundt, Arno J. Patton, Caroline Petersen, Ivy Portelance, Lorraine Schwarz, Julie K. McCloskey, Susan |
author_sort | Jones, Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To summarize the results of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)’s analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for endometrial cancer using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, outline areas of convergence and divergence with the 2014 ASTRO endometrial Guideline, and highlight where this analysis provides new information or perspective. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to combine available evidence with expert opinion. A comprehensive literature review was conducted and a multidisciplinary panel rated the appropriateness of RT options for different clinical scenarios. Treatments were categorized by the median rating as Appropriate, Uncertain, or Inappropriate. RESULTS: The ASTRO endometrial Guideline and this analysis using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method did not recommend adjuvant RT for early-stage, low-risk endometrioid cancers and largely agree regarding use of vaginal brachytherapy for low-intermediate and high-intermediate risk patients. For more advanced endometrioid cancer, chemotherapy with RT is supported by both documents. The Guideline and the RAND/UCLA analysis diverged regarding use of pelvic radiation. For stages II and III, this analysis rated external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy Appropriate, whereas the Guideline preferred external beam alone. In addition, this analysis offers insight on the role of histology, extent of nodal dissection, and para-aortic nodal irradiation; the use of intensity modulated RT; and management of stage IVA. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis based on the RAND/UCLA Method shows significant agreement with the 2014 endometrial Guideline. Areas of divergence, often in scenarios with low-level evidence, included use of external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy in stages II and III and external beam RT alone in early-stage patients. Furthermore, the analysis explores other important questions regarding management of this disease site. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5506720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55067202017-07-24 An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary Jones, Ellen Beriwal, Sushil Beyer, David Chino, Junzo Jhingran, Anuja Lee, Larissa Michalski, Jeff Mundt, Arno J. Patton, Caroline Petersen, Ivy Portelance, Lorraine Schwarz, Julie K. McCloskey, Susan Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: To summarize the results of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)’s analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for endometrial cancer using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, outline areas of convergence and divergence with the 2014 ASTRO endometrial Guideline, and highlight where this analysis provides new information or perspective. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to combine available evidence with expert opinion. A comprehensive literature review was conducted and a multidisciplinary panel rated the appropriateness of RT options for different clinical scenarios. Treatments were categorized by the median rating as Appropriate, Uncertain, or Inappropriate. RESULTS: The ASTRO endometrial Guideline and this analysis using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method did not recommend adjuvant RT for early-stage, low-risk endometrioid cancers and largely agree regarding use of vaginal brachytherapy for low-intermediate and high-intermediate risk patients. For more advanced endometrioid cancer, chemotherapy with RT is supported by both documents. The Guideline and the RAND/UCLA analysis diverged regarding use of pelvic radiation. For stages II and III, this analysis rated external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy Appropriate, whereas the Guideline preferred external beam alone. In addition, this analysis offers insight on the role of histology, extent of nodal dissection, and para-aortic nodal irradiation; the use of intensity modulated RT; and management of stage IVA. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis based on the RAND/UCLA Method shows significant agreement with the 2014 endometrial Guideline. Areas of divergence, often in scenarios with low-level evidence, included use of external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy in stages II and III and external beam RT alone in early-stage patients. Furthermore, the analysis explores other important questions regarding management of this disease site. Elsevier 2015-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5506720/ /pubmed/28799571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2015.10.001 Text en © 2016 The Authors on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Jones, Ellen Beriwal, Sushil Beyer, David Chino, Junzo Jhingran, Anuja Lee, Larissa Michalski, Jeff Mundt, Arno J. Patton, Caroline Petersen, Ivy Portelance, Lorraine Schwarz, Julie K. McCloskey, Susan An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary |
title | An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary |
title_full | An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary |
title_fullStr | An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary |
title_short | An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary |
title_sort | analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the rand/ucla appropriateness method: executive summary |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28799571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2015.10.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesellen ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT beriwalsushil ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT beyerdavid ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT chinojunzo ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT jhingrananuja ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT leelarissa ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT michalskijeff ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT mundtarnoj ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT pattoncaroline ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT petersenivy ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT portelancelorraine ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT schwarzjuliek ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT mccloskeysusan ananalysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT jonesellen analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT beriwalsushil analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT beyerdavid analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT chinojunzo analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT jhingrananuja analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT leelarissa analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT michalskijeff analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT mundtarnoj analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT pattoncaroline analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT petersenivy analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT portelancelorraine analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT schwarzjuliek analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary AT mccloskeysusan analysisofappropriatedeliveryofpostoperativeradiationtherapyforendometrialcancerusingtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodexecutivesummary |