Cargando…

A phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): We sought to assess the utility of docetaxel administered concurrently with salvage radiation therapy (SRT) following postprostatectomy biochemical failure (BF). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with postprostatectomy BF were accrued on a single-arm phase 2 clinical trial. SRT doses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, William C., Feng, Felix Y., Daignault, Stephanie, Hussain, Maha, Smith, David, Cooney, Kathleen, Pienta, Kenneth, Jolly, Shruti, Hollenbeck, Brent, Olson, Karin B., Sandler, Howard M., Ray, Michael E., Hamstra, Daniel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28799570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2015.11.001
_version_ 1783249623248273408
author Jackson, William C.
Feng, Felix Y.
Daignault, Stephanie
Hussain, Maha
Smith, David
Cooney, Kathleen
Pienta, Kenneth
Jolly, Shruti
Hollenbeck, Brent
Olson, Karin B.
Sandler, Howard M.
Ray, Michael E.
Hamstra, Daniel A.
author_facet Jackson, William C.
Feng, Felix Y.
Daignault, Stephanie
Hussain, Maha
Smith, David
Cooney, Kathleen
Pienta, Kenneth
Jolly, Shruti
Hollenbeck, Brent
Olson, Karin B.
Sandler, Howard M.
Ray, Michael E.
Hamstra, Daniel A.
author_sort Jackson, William C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): We sought to assess the utility of docetaxel administered concurrently with salvage radiation therapy (SRT) following postprostatectomy biochemical failure (BF). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with postprostatectomy BF were accrued on a single-arm phase 2 clinical trial. SRT doses ranged from 64.8 to 70.2 Gy and were delivered in 1.8-Gy fractions to the prostate bed alone as the clinical target volume with a +1-cm uniform planning target volume expansion. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 4 years compared with the Stephenson nomogram estimate. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess late toxicity, BF, and distant metastases. An unplanned matched-pair analysis was performed with 19 patients treated with SRT alone. RESULTS: Nineteen men were accrued and treated. Median follow-up was 4.8 years. Median pre-RT prostate-specific antigen level was 0.7 ng/mL (interquartile range, 0.4-1.3 ng/mL). All 8 cycles of docetaxel were completed in 17 (89%) patients. Acute grade 1-4 toxicities were observed in 79%, 50%, 58%, and 11%, respectively. A total of 68% of acute grade 1 toxicities were related to fatigue, urinary, or bowel symptoms. For grade 2 toxicities, 76% were related to neutropenia, fatigue, or urinary symptoms. Acute grade 3 and 4 toxicities were most commonly neutropenia (84% and 100%, respectively). All late toxicities were grade 1 to 2 with 89% related to bowel or urinary function. Predicted 4-year progression-free survival was 39% and observed was 42% (90% confidence interval [CI], 24-60). Matched-pair analysis demonstrated no significant improvement in BF (P = .96, hazard ratio, 0.98; 90% CI, 0.4-2.3) or distant metastases (P = .09; hazard ratio, 0.3; 90% CI, 0.07-1.2), and no difference between late bowel (P = .60) or urinary toxicity (P = .41). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel can safely be administered concurrently with SRT without significantly impacting posttreatment toxicity. Neutropenia was the most significant acute toxicity. Given the small sample size, no clear clinical benefit was observed. Larger studies are needed to determine the efficacy of concurrent docetaxel in this setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5506748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55067482017-07-24 A phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy Jackson, William C. Feng, Felix Y. Daignault, Stephanie Hussain, Maha Smith, David Cooney, Kathleen Pienta, Kenneth Jolly, Shruti Hollenbeck, Brent Olson, Karin B. Sandler, Howard M. Ray, Michael E. Hamstra, Daniel A. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): We sought to assess the utility of docetaxel administered concurrently with salvage radiation therapy (SRT) following postprostatectomy biochemical failure (BF). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with postprostatectomy BF were accrued on a single-arm phase 2 clinical trial. SRT doses ranged from 64.8 to 70.2 Gy and were delivered in 1.8-Gy fractions to the prostate bed alone as the clinical target volume with a +1-cm uniform planning target volume expansion. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 4 years compared with the Stephenson nomogram estimate. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess late toxicity, BF, and distant metastases. An unplanned matched-pair analysis was performed with 19 patients treated with SRT alone. RESULTS: Nineteen men were accrued and treated. Median follow-up was 4.8 years. Median pre-RT prostate-specific antigen level was 0.7 ng/mL (interquartile range, 0.4-1.3 ng/mL). All 8 cycles of docetaxel were completed in 17 (89%) patients. Acute grade 1-4 toxicities were observed in 79%, 50%, 58%, and 11%, respectively. A total of 68% of acute grade 1 toxicities were related to fatigue, urinary, or bowel symptoms. For grade 2 toxicities, 76% were related to neutropenia, fatigue, or urinary symptoms. Acute grade 3 and 4 toxicities were most commonly neutropenia (84% and 100%, respectively). All late toxicities were grade 1 to 2 with 89% related to bowel or urinary function. Predicted 4-year progression-free survival was 39% and observed was 42% (90% confidence interval [CI], 24-60). Matched-pair analysis demonstrated no significant improvement in BF (P = .96, hazard ratio, 0.98; 90% CI, 0.4-2.3) or distant metastases (P = .09; hazard ratio, 0.3; 90% CI, 0.07-1.2), and no difference between late bowel (P = .60) or urinary toxicity (P = .41). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel can safely be administered concurrently with SRT without significantly impacting posttreatment toxicity. Neutropenia was the most significant acute toxicity. Given the small sample size, no clear clinical benefit was observed. Larger studies are needed to determine the efficacy of concurrent docetaxel in this setting. Elsevier 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5506748/ /pubmed/28799570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2015.11.001 Text en © 2016 The Authors on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Jackson, William C.
Feng, Felix Y.
Daignault, Stephanie
Hussain, Maha
Smith, David
Cooney, Kathleen
Pienta, Kenneth
Jolly, Shruti
Hollenbeck, Brent
Olson, Karin B.
Sandler, Howard M.
Ray, Michael E.
Hamstra, Daniel A.
A phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy
title A phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy
title_full A phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr A phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed A phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy
title_short A phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy
title_sort phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28799570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2015.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT jacksonwilliamc aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT fengfelixy aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT daignaultstephanie aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT hussainmaha aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT smithdavid aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT cooneykathleen aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT pientakenneth aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT jollyshruti aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT hollenbeckbrent aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT olsonkarinb aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT sandlerhowardm aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT raymichaele aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT hamstradaniela aphase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT jacksonwilliamc phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT fengfelixy phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT daignaultstephanie phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT hussainmaha phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT smithdavid phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT cooneykathleen phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT pientakenneth phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT jollyshruti phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT hollenbeckbrent phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT olsonkarinb phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT sandlerhowardm phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT raymichaele phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy
AT hamstradaniela phase2trialofsalvageradiationandconcurrentweeklydocetaxelafterarisingprostatespecificantigenlevelafterradicalprostatectomy