Cargando…

Axillary lymph node dissection on the run?

The standard approach of performing a completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after a positive sentinel node for breast cancer patients is no longer generally accepted. This study applied the criterion of a 27% risk of having residual positive lymph nodes calculated by the MD Anderson nomo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maeseele, N, Faes, J, Van de Putte, T, Vlasselaer, J, de Jonge, E, Schobbens, JC, Deraedt, K, Debrock, G, Van de Putte, G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28721184
_version_ 1783249627670118400
author Maeseele, N
Faes, J
Van de Putte, T
Vlasselaer, J
de Jonge, E
Schobbens, JC
Deraedt, K
Debrock, G
Van de Putte, G
author_facet Maeseele, N
Faes, J
Van de Putte, T
Vlasselaer, J
de Jonge, E
Schobbens, JC
Deraedt, K
Debrock, G
Van de Putte, G
author_sort Maeseele, N
collection PubMed
description The standard approach of performing a completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after a positive sentinel node for breast cancer patients is no longer generally accepted. This study applied the criterion of a 27% risk of having residual positive lymph nodes calculated by the MD Anderson nomogram to perform a cALND. This 27% cut-off is based on the number of positive non-sentinels in the Z0011 trial. A cohort of 166 cN0, sentinel positive breast cancer patients was used to validate the MD Anderson nomogram. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis shows an AUC (Area Under the Curve) of 0.76 and an optimal cut-off at 34% risk of positive non- SLNs (sensitivity 86%, specificity 57%). The 27% cut-off has a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 41% to detect positive non-sentinels. In a second cohort (N= 114) the 27% cut-off criterion was prospectively applied and appeared to be practice changing. Although we take minimal risk to leave disease behind (2/166 patients >3 positive nodes), 30.7 % in the first cohort and 54.4 % of the patients in the second cohort could be spared a cALND. The Z0011 criteria would have had more impact, omitting 90% of the cALND, but leaves more disease behind. The impact of leaving disease behind on survival remains unanswered but is awaited by long term follow up of large prospective cohort studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5506769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55067692017-07-18 Axillary lymph node dissection on the run? Maeseele, N Faes, J Van de Putte, T Vlasselaer, J de Jonge, E Schobbens, JC Deraedt, K Debrock, G Van de Putte, G Facts Views Vis Obgyn Viewpoint The standard approach of performing a completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after a positive sentinel node for breast cancer patients is no longer generally accepted. This study applied the criterion of a 27% risk of having residual positive lymph nodes calculated by the MD Anderson nomogram to perform a cALND. This 27% cut-off is based on the number of positive non-sentinels in the Z0011 trial. A cohort of 166 cN0, sentinel positive breast cancer patients was used to validate the MD Anderson nomogram. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis shows an AUC (Area Under the Curve) of 0.76 and an optimal cut-off at 34% risk of positive non- SLNs (sensitivity 86%, specificity 57%). The 27% cut-off has a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 41% to detect positive non-sentinels. In a second cohort (N= 114) the 27% cut-off criterion was prospectively applied and appeared to be practice changing. Although we take minimal risk to leave disease behind (2/166 patients >3 positive nodes), 30.7 % in the first cohort and 54.4 % of the patients in the second cohort could be spared a cALND. The Z0011 criteria would have had more impact, omitting 90% of the cALND, but leaves more disease behind. The impact of leaving disease behind on survival remains unanswered but is awaited by long term follow up of large prospective cohort studies. Universa Press 2017-03 2017-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5506769/ /pubmed/28721184 Text en Copyright © 2017 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Maeseele, N
Faes, J
Van de Putte, T
Vlasselaer, J
de Jonge, E
Schobbens, JC
Deraedt, K
Debrock, G
Van de Putte, G
Axillary lymph node dissection on the run?
title Axillary lymph node dissection on the run?
title_full Axillary lymph node dissection on the run?
title_fullStr Axillary lymph node dissection on the run?
title_full_unstemmed Axillary lymph node dissection on the run?
title_short Axillary lymph node dissection on the run?
title_sort axillary lymph node dissection on the run?
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28721184
work_keys_str_mv AT maeseelen axillarylymphnodedissectionontherun
AT faesj axillarylymphnodedissectionontherun
AT vandeputtet axillarylymphnodedissectionontherun
AT vlasselaerj axillarylymphnodedissectionontherun
AT dejongee axillarylymphnodedissectionontherun
AT schobbensjc axillarylymphnodedissectionontherun
AT deraedtk axillarylymphnodedissectionontherun
AT debrockg axillarylymphnodedissectionontherun
AT vandeputteg axillarylymphnodedissectionontherun