Cargando…
Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration
The purpose of this study was to compare bone regeneration and space maintaining ability of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone grafts with conventional biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). After mixing polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10040421 |
_version_ | 1783249650363400192 |
---|---|
author | Hwang, Kyoung-Sub Choi, Jae-Won Kim, Jae-Hun Chung, Ho Yun Jin, Songwan Shim, Jin-Hyung Yun, Won-Soo Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo |
author_facet | Hwang, Kyoung-Sub Choi, Jae-Won Kim, Jae-Hun Chung, Ho Yun Jin, Songwan Shim, Jin-Hyung Yun, Won-Soo Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo |
author_sort | Hwang, Kyoung-Sub |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to compare bone regeneration and space maintaining ability of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone grafts with conventional biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). After mixing polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in a 4:4:2 ratio, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP particulate bone grafts were fabricated using 3D printing technology. Fabricated particulate bone grafts were mixed with atelocollagen to produce collagen-based PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts. After formation of calvarial defects 8 mm in diameter, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and BCP were implanted into bone defects of 32 rats. Although PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts were not superior in bone regeneration ability compared to BCP, the results showed relatively similar performance. Furthermore, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts showed better ability to maintain bone defects and to support barrier membranes than BCP. Therefore, within the limitations of this study, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts could be considered as an alternative to synthetic bone grafts available for clinical use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5506921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55069212017-07-28 Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration Hwang, Kyoung-Sub Choi, Jae-Won Kim, Jae-Hun Chung, Ho Yun Jin, Songwan Shim, Jin-Hyung Yun, Won-Soo Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo Materials (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to compare bone regeneration and space maintaining ability of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone grafts with conventional biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). After mixing polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in a 4:4:2 ratio, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP particulate bone grafts were fabricated using 3D printing technology. Fabricated particulate bone grafts were mixed with atelocollagen to produce collagen-based PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts. After formation of calvarial defects 8 mm in diameter, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and BCP were implanted into bone defects of 32 rats. Although PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts were not superior in bone regeneration ability compared to BCP, the results showed relatively similar performance. Furthermore, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts showed better ability to maintain bone defects and to support barrier membranes than BCP. Therefore, within the limitations of this study, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts could be considered as an alternative to synthetic bone grafts available for clinical use. MDPI 2017-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5506921/ /pubmed/28772780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10040421 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hwang, Kyoung-Sub Choi, Jae-Won Kim, Jae-Hun Chung, Ho Yun Jin, Songwan Shim, Jin-Hyung Yun, Won-Soo Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration |
title | Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration |
title_full | Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration |
title_fullStr | Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration |
title_short | Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration |
title_sort | comparative efficacies of collagen-based 3d printed pcl/plga/β-tcp composite block bone grafts and biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitute for bone regeneration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10040421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hwangkyoungsub comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration AT choijaewon comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration AT kimjaehun comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration AT chunghoyun comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration AT jinsongwan comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration AT shimjinhyung comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration AT yunwonsoo comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration AT jeongchangmo comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration AT huhjungbo comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration |