Cargando…

Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration

The purpose of this study was to compare bone regeneration and space maintaining ability of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone grafts with conventional biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). After mixing polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Kyoung-Sub, Choi, Jae-Won, Kim, Jae-Hun, Chung, Ho Yun, Jin, Songwan, Shim, Jin-Hyung, Yun, Won-Soo, Jeong, Chang-Mo, Huh, Jung-Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10040421
_version_ 1783249650363400192
author Hwang, Kyoung-Sub
Choi, Jae-Won
Kim, Jae-Hun
Chung, Ho Yun
Jin, Songwan
Shim, Jin-Hyung
Yun, Won-Soo
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Huh, Jung-Bo
author_facet Hwang, Kyoung-Sub
Choi, Jae-Won
Kim, Jae-Hun
Chung, Ho Yun
Jin, Songwan
Shim, Jin-Hyung
Yun, Won-Soo
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Huh, Jung-Bo
author_sort Hwang, Kyoung-Sub
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare bone regeneration and space maintaining ability of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone grafts with conventional biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). After mixing polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in a 4:4:2 ratio, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP particulate bone grafts were fabricated using 3D printing technology. Fabricated particulate bone grafts were mixed with atelocollagen to produce collagen-based PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts. After formation of calvarial defects 8 mm in diameter, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and BCP were implanted into bone defects of 32 rats. Although PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts were not superior in bone regeneration ability compared to BCP, the results showed relatively similar performance. Furthermore, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts showed better ability to maintain bone defects and to support barrier membranes than BCP. Therefore, within the limitations of this study, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts could be considered as an alternative to synthetic bone grafts available for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5506921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55069212017-07-28 Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration Hwang, Kyoung-Sub Choi, Jae-Won Kim, Jae-Hun Chung, Ho Yun Jin, Songwan Shim, Jin-Hyung Yun, Won-Soo Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo Materials (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to compare bone regeneration and space maintaining ability of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone grafts with conventional biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). After mixing polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in a 4:4:2 ratio, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP particulate bone grafts were fabricated using 3D printing technology. Fabricated particulate bone grafts were mixed with atelocollagen to produce collagen-based PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts. After formation of calvarial defects 8 mm in diameter, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and BCP were implanted into bone defects of 32 rats. Although PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts were not superior in bone regeneration ability compared to BCP, the results showed relatively similar performance. Furthermore, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts showed better ability to maintain bone defects and to support barrier membranes than BCP. Therefore, within the limitations of this study, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts could be considered as an alternative to synthetic bone grafts available for clinical use. MDPI 2017-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5506921/ /pubmed/28772780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10040421 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hwang, Kyoung-Sub
Choi, Jae-Won
Kim, Jae-Hun
Chung, Ho Yun
Jin, Songwan
Shim, Jin-Hyung
Yun, Won-Soo
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Huh, Jung-Bo
Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration
title Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration
title_full Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration
title_short Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration
title_sort comparative efficacies of collagen-based 3d printed pcl/plga/β-tcp composite block bone grafts and biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitute for bone regeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10040421
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangkyoungsub comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration
AT choijaewon comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration
AT kimjaehun comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration
AT chunghoyun comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration
AT jinsongwan comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration
AT shimjinhyung comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration
AT yunwonsoo comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration
AT jeongchangmo comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration
AT huhjungbo comparativeefficaciesofcollagenbased3dprintedpclplgabtcpcompositeblockbonegraftsandbiphasiccalciumphosphatebonesubstituteforboneregeneration