Cargando…
Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging
Prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications have a high incidence in elderly men. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic capabilities of susceptibility-weighted imaging in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications. A total number of 156 men, including 34 with prostate cancer and 122 wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5507089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.177840 |
_version_ | 1783249685520056320 |
---|---|
author | Dou, Shewei Bai, Yan Shandil, Ankit Ding, Degang Shi, Dapeng Haacke, E Mark Wang, Meiyun |
author_facet | Dou, Shewei Bai, Yan Shandil, Ankit Ding, Degang Shi, Dapeng Haacke, E Mark Wang, Meiyun |
author_sort | Dou, Shewei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications have a high incidence in elderly men. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic capabilities of susceptibility-weighted imaging in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications. A total number of 156 men, including 34 with prostate cancer and 122 with benign prostate were enrolled in this study. Computed tomography, conventional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and susceptibility-weighted imaging were performed on all the patients. One hundred and twelve prostatic calcifications were detected in 87 patients. The sensitivities and specificities of the conventional magnetic resonance imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, and susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications were calculated. McNemar's Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in sensitivities and specificities between the techniques. The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostatic cancer were greater than that of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (P < 0.05). In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostatic calcifications were comparable to that of computed tomography and greater than that of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (P < 0.05). Given the high incidence of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) abnormality in prostate cancer, we conclude that susceptibility-weighted imaging is more sensitive and specific than conventional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and computed tomography in detecting prostate cancer. Furthermore, susceptibility-weighted imaging can identify prostatic calcifications similar to computed tomography, and it is much better than conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5507089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55070892017-07-17 Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging Dou, Shewei Bai, Yan Shandil, Ankit Ding, Degang Shi, Dapeng Haacke, E Mark Wang, Meiyun Asian J Androl Original Article Prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications have a high incidence in elderly men. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic capabilities of susceptibility-weighted imaging in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications. A total number of 156 men, including 34 with prostate cancer and 122 with benign prostate were enrolled in this study. Computed tomography, conventional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and susceptibility-weighted imaging were performed on all the patients. One hundred and twelve prostatic calcifications were detected in 87 patients. The sensitivities and specificities of the conventional magnetic resonance imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, and susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications were calculated. McNemar's Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in sensitivities and specificities between the techniques. The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostatic cancer were greater than that of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (P < 0.05). In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostatic calcifications were comparable to that of computed tomography and greater than that of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (P < 0.05). Given the high incidence of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) abnormality in prostate cancer, we conclude that susceptibility-weighted imaging is more sensitive and specific than conventional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and computed tomography in detecting prostate cancer. Furthermore, susceptibility-weighted imaging can identify prostatic calcifications similar to computed tomography, and it is much better than conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5507089/ /pubmed/27004542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.177840 Text en Copyright: © The Author(s)(2017) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dou, Shewei Bai, Yan Shandil, Ankit Ding, Degang Shi, Dapeng Haacke, E Mark Wang, Meiyun Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5507089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.177840 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doushewei detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging AT baiyan detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging AT shandilankit detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging AT dingdegang detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging AT shidapeng detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging AT haackeemark detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging AT wangmeiyun detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging |