Cargando…

Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging

Prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications have a high incidence in elderly men. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic capabilities of susceptibility-weighted imaging in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications. A total number of 156 men, including 34 with prostate cancer and 122 wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dou, Shewei, Bai, Yan, Shandil, Ankit, Ding, Degang, Shi, Dapeng, Haacke, E Mark, Wang, Meiyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5507089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004542
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.177840
_version_ 1783249685520056320
author Dou, Shewei
Bai, Yan
Shandil, Ankit
Ding, Degang
Shi, Dapeng
Haacke, E Mark
Wang, Meiyun
author_facet Dou, Shewei
Bai, Yan
Shandil, Ankit
Ding, Degang
Shi, Dapeng
Haacke, E Mark
Wang, Meiyun
author_sort Dou, Shewei
collection PubMed
description Prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications have a high incidence in elderly men. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic capabilities of susceptibility-weighted imaging in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications. A total number of 156 men, including 34 with prostate cancer and 122 with benign prostate were enrolled in this study. Computed tomography, conventional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and susceptibility-weighted imaging were performed on all the patients. One hundred and twelve prostatic calcifications were detected in 87 patients. The sensitivities and specificities of the conventional magnetic resonance imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, and susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications were calculated. McNemar's Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in sensitivities and specificities between the techniques. The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostatic cancer were greater than that of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (P < 0.05). In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostatic calcifications were comparable to that of computed tomography and greater than that of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (P < 0.05). Given the high incidence of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) abnormality in prostate cancer, we conclude that susceptibility-weighted imaging is more sensitive and specific than conventional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and computed tomography in detecting prostate cancer. Furthermore, susceptibility-weighted imaging can identify prostatic calcifications similar to computed tomography, and it is much better than conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5507089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55070892017-07-17 Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging Dou, Shewei Bai, Yan Shandil, Ankit Ding, Degang Shi, Dapeng Haacke, E Mark Wang, Meiyun Asian J Androl Original Article Prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications have a high incidence in elderly men. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic capabilities of susceptibility-weighted imaging in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications. A total number of 156 men, including 34 with prostate cancer and 122 with benign prostate were enrolled in this study. Computed tomography, conventional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and susceptibility-weighted imaging were performed on all the patients. One hundred and twelve prostatic calcifications were detected in 87 patients. The sensitivities and specificities of the conventional magnetic resonance imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, and susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications were calculated. McNemar's Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in sensitivities and specificities between the techniques. The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostatic cancer were greater than that of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (P < 0.05). In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of susceptibility-filtered phase images in detecting prostatic calcifications were comparable to that of computed tomography and greater than that of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (P < 0.05). Given the high incidence of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) abnormality in prostate cancer, we conclude that susceptibility-weighted imaging is more sensitive and specific than conventional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and computed tomography in detecting prostate cancer. Furthermore, susceptibility-weighted imaging can identify prostatic calcifications similar to computed tomography, and it is much better than conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5507089/ /pubmed/27004542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.177840 Text en Copyright: © The Author(s)(2017) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dou, Shewei
Bai, Yan
Shandil, Ankit
Ding, Degang
Shi, Dapeng
Haacke, E Mark
Wang, Meiyun
Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging
title Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort detecting prostate cancer and prostatic calcifications using advanced magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5507089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004542
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.177840
work_keys_str_mv AT doushewei detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT baiyan detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT shandilankit detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT dingdegang detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT shidapeng detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT haackeemark detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging
AT wangmeiyun detectingprostatecancerandprostaticcalcificationsusingadvancedmagneticresonanceimaging