Cargando…

Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews

OBJECTIVES: While there is strong evidence that regular participation in physical activity (PA) brings numerous health benefits to older adults, and interventions to effectively promote PA are being developed and tested, the characteristics and components of the most effective interventions remain u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zubala, Ania, MacGillivray, Stephen, Frost, Helen, Kroll, Thilo, Skelton, Dawn A., Gavine, Anna, Gray, Nicola M., Toma, Madalina, Morris, Jacqui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5507305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180902
_version_ 1783249714020352000
author Zubala, Ania
MacGillivray, Stephen
Frost, Helen
Kroll, Thilo
Skelton, Dawn A.
Gavine, Anna
Gray, Nicola M.
Toma, Madalina
Morris, Jacqui
author_facet Zubala, Ania
MacGillivray, Stephen
Frost, Helen
Kroll, Thilo
Skelton, Dawn A.
Gavine, Anna
Gray, Nicola M.
Toma, Madalina
Morris, Jacqui
author_sort Zubala, Ania
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: While there is strong evidence that regular participation in physical activity (PA) brings numerous health benefits to older adults, and interventions to effectively promote PA are being developed and tested, the characteristics and components of the most effective interventions remain unclear. This systematically conducted review of systematic reviews evaluated the effects and characteristics of PA promotion interventions aimed at community dwelling people over 50 years old. METHODS: Major databases were searched for reviews from January 1990 to May 2015. TIDieR guidelines aided data extraction and the ROBIS tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Primary outcomes were objective and self-reported levels of PA. Indicators of psychological wellbeing and participation rates were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1284 records identified, 19 reviews met inclusion criteria and eight included meta-analyses. Interventions typically incorporated behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and were delivered as face-to-face, remote, group, individual or as combined interventions. Despite their heterogeneity, interventions often resulted in sustained improvements in PA over the study period, typically at 12 months, and led to improvements in general wellbeing. However, ways to ensure effective maintenance beyond one year are unclear. Certain intervention components were more clearly associated with positive effects (e.g. tailoring promotion strategy with combination of cognitive and behavioural elements, low to moderate intensity activity recommended). We found no evidence that certain other intervention characteristics were superior in achieving positive outcomes (e.g. mode of delivery, setting, professional background of the intervention provider, type of PA recommended). CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that interventions to promote PA among older adults are generally effective but there is uncertainty around the most beneficial intervention components. There are indications that purely cognitive strategies and BCTs might be less suitable for older adults than motivators more meaningful to them, including social and environmental support, and enjoyment coming from being physically active. A whole system-oriented approach is required that is tailored to meet the needs of older adults and aligned with social, individual and environmental factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5507305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55073052017-07-25 Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews Zubala, Ania MacGillivray, Stephen Frost, Helen Kroll, Thilo Skelton, Dawn A. Gavine, Anna Gray, Nicola M. Toma, Madalina Morris, Jacqui PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: While there is strong evidence that regular participation in physical activity (PA) brings numerous health benefits to older adults, and interventions to effectively promote PA are being developed and tested, the characteristics and components of the most effective interventions remain unclear. This systematically conducted review of systematic reviews evaluated the effects and characteristics of PA promotion interventions aimed at community dwelling people over 50 years old. METHODS: Major databases were searched for reviews from January 1990 to May 2015. TIDieR guidelines aided data extraction and the ROBIS tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Primary outcomes were objective and self-reported levels of PA. Indicators of psychological wellbeing and participation rates were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1284 records identified, 19 reviews met inclusion criteria and eight included meta-analyses. Interventions typically incorporated behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and were delivered as face-to-face, remote, group, individual or as combined interventions. Despite their heterogeneity, interventions often resulted in sustained improvements in PA over the study period, typically at 12 months, and led to improvements in general wellbeing. However, ways to ensure effective maintenance beyond one year are unclear. Certain intervention components were more clearly associated with positive effects (e.g. tailoring promotion strategy with combination of cognitive and behavioural elements, low to moderate intensity activity recommended). We found no evidence that certain other intervention characteristics were superior in achieving positive outcomes (e.g. mode of delivery, setting, professional background of the intervention provider, type of PA recommended). CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that interventions to promote PA among older adults are generally effective but there is uncertainty around the most beneficial intervention components. There are indications that purely cognitive strategies and BCTs might be less suitable for older adults than motivators more meaningful to them, including social and environmental support, and enjoyment coming from being physically active. A whole system-oriented approach is required that is tailored to meet the needs of older adults and aligned with social, individual and environmental factors. Public Library of Science 2017-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5507305/ /pubmed/28700754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180902 Text en © 2017 Zubala et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zubala, Ania
MacGillivray, Stephen
Frost, Helen
Kroll, Thilo
Skelton, Dawn A.
Gavine, Anna
Gray, Nicola M.
Toma, Madalina
Morris, Jacqui
Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews
title Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews
title_full Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews
title_fullStr Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews
title_full_unstemmed Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews
title_short Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews
title_sort promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: a systematic review of reviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5507305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180902
work_keys_str_mv AT zubalaania promotionofphysicalactivityinterventionsforcommunitydwellingolderadultsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT macgillivraystephen promotionofphysicalactivityinterventionsforcommunitydwellingolderadultsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT frosthelen promotionofphysicalactivityinterventionsforcommunitydwellingolderadultsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT krollthilo promotionofphysicalactivityinterventionsforcommunitydwellingolderadultsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT skeltondawna promotionofphysicalactivityinterventionsforcommunitydwellingolderadultsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT gavineanna promotionofphysicalactivityinterventionsforcommunitydwellingolderadultsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT graynicolam promotionofphysicalactivityinterventionsforcommunitydwellingolderadultsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT tomamadalina promotionofphysicalactivityinterventionsforcommunitydwellingolderadultsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT morrisjacqui promotionofphysicalactivityinterventionsforcommunitydwellingolderadultsasystematicreviewofreviews