Cargando…
Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK’s national research assessment exercise
PURPOSE: There is a general inquisition regarding the monetary value of a research output, as a substantial amount of funding in modern academia is essentially awarded to good research presented in the form of journal articles, conferences papers, performances, compositions, exhibitions, books and b...
Autores principales: | Koya, Kushwanth, Chowdhury, Gobinda |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5507403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179722 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK’s national research assessment exercise
por: Koya, Kushwanth, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Measuring the Impact of Research: Lessons from the UK’s Research Excellence Framework 2014
por: Chowdhury, Gobinda, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Working with young peer researchers in sexuality studies: benefits, challenges and lessons learnt
por: Page, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Assessing European national health information systems in peer review format: lessons learnt
por: Bogaert, Petronille, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Lessons learnt from the International Peer Review Week 2022 with the theme – ”Research Integrity: Creating and supporting trust in research”
por: Sengupta, Sabyasachi
Publicado: (2022)