Cargando…
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy in urology: A randomized study
INTRODUCTION: Conventional two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy systems have the drawback of poor depth perception and spatial orientation. Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic systems have stereoscopic vision in which depth perception is achieved by different unique images received by each eye. We evalu...
Autores principales: | Patankar, Suresh B., Padasalagi, Gururaj R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717274 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_418_16 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
por: Wang, Zheng, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
por: Koppatz, Hanna, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy in surgical efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Cheng, Ji, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study
por: Koppatz, Hanna E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Three-dimensional laparoscopy: Principles and practice
por: Sinha, Rakesh Y., et al.
Publicado: (2017)