Cargando…
Adipose-derived stem cells: Comparison between two methods of isolation for clinical applications
BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stem cells are recognized as being an effective mesenchymal stem cell population with enormous potential in different fields of regenerative medicine and stem cell therapy. Although there is unanimous agreement on the harvesting procedure for adipose tissue, there are var...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28736612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.018 |
_version_ | 1783249892658905088 |
---|---|
author | Raposio, Edoardo Simonacci, Francesco Perrotta, Rosario E. |
author_facet | Raposio, Edoardo Simonacci, Francesco Perrotta, Rosario E. |
author_sort | Raposio, Edoardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stem cells are recognized as being an effective mesenchymal stem cell population with enormous potential in different fields of regenerative medicine and stem cell therapy. Although there is unanimous agreement on the harvesting procedure for adipose tissue, there are various protocols for adipose-derived stem cell isolation. The aim of this study was compare two methods of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) isolation, one based on a mechanical + enzymatic (ME) procedure and the other one exclusively mechanical (MC), in order to determine which one was superior to the other in accordance with current European and US legislation. METHODS: We reported step by step the two different methods ASCs isolation by comparing them. The ME procedure included the use of a centrifuge, an incubator and collagenase digestion solution (Collagenase NB 6 GMP Grade 17458; Serva GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). The MC procedure was performed by vibrating shaker and centrifuge, both placed in a laminar airflow bench. RESULTS: With the ME procedure, a mean of 9.06 × 10(5) ASCs (range, 8.4 to 9.72 × 10(5); SD ± 6.6 × 10(5)) was collected, corresponding to 25.9% of the total number of harvested cells. With the MC procedure, a mean of 5 × 10(5) ASCs (range: 4.0 to 6.0 × 10(5); SD, ±1 × 10(5)) was collected, corresponding to 5% of the total number of harvested cells. CONCLUSION: Based on data collected, from the same amount of lipoaspirate the ME procedure allowed to isolate a greater number of ASCs (25,9%) compared to the MC one (5%). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5508488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55084882017-07-21 Adipose-derived stem cells: Comparison between two methods of isolation for clinical applications Raposio, Edoardo Simonacci, Francesco Perrotta, Rosario E. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stem cells are recognized as being an effective mesenchymal stem cell population with enormous potential in different fields of regenerative medicine and stem cell therapy. Although there is unanimous agreement on the harvesting procedure for adipose tissue, there are various protocols for adipose-derived stem cell isolation. The aim of this study was compare two methods of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) isolation, one based on a mechanical + enzymatic (ME) procedure and the other one exclusively mechanical (MC), in order to determine which one was superior to the other in accordance with current European and US legislation. METHODS: We reported step by step the two different methods ASCs isolation by comparing them. The ME procedure included the use of a centrifuge, an incubator and collagenase digestion solution (Collagenase NB 6 GMP Grade 17458; Serva GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). The MC procedure was performed by vibrating shaker and centrifuge, both placed in a laminar airflow bench. RESULTS: With the ME procedure, a mean of 9.06 × 10(5) ASCs (range, 8.4 to 9.72 × 10(5); SD ± 6.6 × 10(5)) was collected, corresponding to 25.9% of the total number of harvested cells. With the MC procedure, a mean of 5 × 10(5) ASCs (range: 4.0 to 6.0 × 10(5); SD, ±1 × 10(5)) was collected, corresponding to 5% of the total number of harvested cells. CONCLUSION: Based on data collected, from the same amount of lipoaspirate the ME procedure allowed to isolate a greater number of ASCs (25,9%) compared to the MC one (5%). Elsevier 2017-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5508488/ /pubmed/28736612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.018 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Raposio, Edoardo Simonacci, Francesco Perrotta, Rosario E. Adipose-derived stem cells: Comparison between two methods of isolation for clinical applications |
title | Adipose-derived stem cells: Comparison between two methods of isolation for clinical applications |
title_full | Adipose-derived stem cells: Comparison between two methods of isolation for clinical applications |
title_fullStr | Adipose-derived stem cells: Comparison between two methods of isolation for clinical applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Adipose-derived stem cells: Comparison between two methods of isolation for clinical applications |
title_short | Adipose-derived stem cells: Comparison between two methods of isolation for clinical applications |
title_sort | adipose-derived stem cells: comparison between two methods of isolation for clinical applications |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28736612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raposioedoardo adiposederivedstemcellscomparisonbetweentwomethodsofisolationforclinicalapplications AT simonaccifrancesco adiposederivedstemcellscomparisonbetweentwomethodsofisolationforclinicalapplications AT perrottarosarioe adiposederivedstemcellscomparisonbetweentwomethodsofisolationforclinicalapplications |