Cargando…

The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus

BACKGROUND: The previously reported prevalence of gastric heterotopia in the cervical esophagus, also termed inlet patch (IP), varies substantially, ranging from 0.18 to 14%. Regarding cases with adenocarcinoma within IP, some experts recommend to routinely obtain biopsies from IP for histopathology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peitz, Ulrich, Vieth, Michael, Evert, Matthias, Arand, Jovana, Roessner, Albert, Malfertheiner, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3
_version_ 1783249923084386304
author Peitz, Ulrich
Vieth, Michael
Evert, Matthias
Arand, Jovana
Roessner, Albert
Malfertheiner, Peter
author_facet Peitz, Ulrich
Vieth, Michael
Evert, Matthias
Arand, Jovana
Roessner, Albert
Malfertheiner, Peter
author_sort Peitz, Ulrich
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The previously reported prevalence of gastric heterotopia in the cervical esophagus, also termed inlet patch (IP), varies substantially, ranging from 0.18 to 14%. Regarding cases with adenocarcinoma within IP, some experts recommend to routinely obtain biopsies from IP for histopathology. Another concern is the reported relation to Barrett’s esophagus. The objectives of the study were to prospectively determine the prevalence of IP and of preneoplasia within IP, and to investigate the association between IP and Barrett’s esophagus. METHODS: 372 consecutive patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy were carefully searched for the presence of IP. Biopsies for histopathology were targeted to the IP, columnar metaplasia of the lower esophagus, gastric corpus and antrum. Different definitions of Barrett’s esophagus were tested for an association with IP. RESULTS: At least one IP was endoscopically identified in 53 patients (14.5%). Histopathology, performed in 46 patients, confirmed columnar epithelium in 87% of cases, which essentially presented corpus and/or cardia-type mucosa. Intestinal metaplasia was detected in two cases, but no neoplasia. A previously reported association of IP with Barrett’s esophagus was weak, statistically significant only when short segments of cardia-type mucosa of the lower esophagus were included in the definition of Barrett’s esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IP seems to be underestimated, but preneoplasia within IP is rare, which does not support the recommendation to regularly obtain biopsies for histopathology. Biopsies should be targeted to any irregularities within the heterotopic mucosa. The correlation of IP with Barrett’s esophagus hints to a partly common pathogenesis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5508702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55087022017-07-17 The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus Peitz, Ulrich Vieth, Michael Evert, Matthias Arand, Jovana Roessner, Albert Malfertheiner, Peter BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: The previously reported prevalence of gastric heterotopia in the cervical esophagus, also termed inlet patch (IP), varies substantially, ranging from 0.18 to 14%. Regarding cases with adenocarcinoma within IP, some experts recommend to routinely obtain biopsies from IP for histopathology. Another concern is the reported relation to Barrett’s esophagus. The objectives of the study were to prospectively determine the prevalence of IP and of preneoplasia within IP, and to investigate the association between IP and Barrett’s esophagus. METHODS: 372 consecutive patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy were carefully searched for the presence of IP. Biopsies for histopathology were targeted to the IP, columnar metaplasia of the lower esophagus, gastric corpus and antrum. Different definitions of Barrett’s esophagus were tested for an association with IP. RESULTS: At least one IP was endoscopically identified in 53 patients (14.5%). Histopathology, performed in 46 patients, confirmed columnar epithelium in 87% of cases, which essentially presented corpus and/or cardia-type mucosa. Intestinal metaplasia was detected in two cases, but no neoplasia. A previously reported association of IP with Barrett’s esophagus was weak, statistically significant only when short segments of cardia-type mucosa of the lower esophagus were included in the definition of Barrett’s esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IP seems to be underestimated, but preneoplasia within IP is rare, which does not support the recommendation to regularly obtain biopsies for histopathology. Biopsies should be targeted to any irregularities within the heterotopic mucosa. The correlation of IP with Barrett’s esophagus hints to a partly common pathogenesis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5508702/ /pubmed/28701149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peitz, Ulrich
Vieth, Michael
Evert, Matthias
Arand, Jovana
Roessner, Albert
Malfertheiner, Peter
The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus
title The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus
title_full The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus
title_fullStr The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus
title_short The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus
title_sort prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with barrett’s esophagus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3
work_keys_str_mv AT peitzulrich theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT viethmichael theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT evertmatthias theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT arandjovana theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT roessneralbert theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT malfertheinerpeter theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT peitzulrich prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT viethmichael prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT evertmatthias prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT arandjovana prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT roessneralbert prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus
AT malfertheinerpeter prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus