Cargando…
The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus
BACKGROUND: The previously reported prevalence of gastric heterotopia in the cervical esophagus, also termed inlet patch (IP), varies substantially, ranging from 0.18 to 14%. Regarding cases with adenocarcinoma within IP, some experts recommend to routinely obtain biopsies from IP for histopathology...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3 |
_version_ | 1783249923084386304 |
---|---|
author | Peitz, Ulrich Vieth, Michael Evert, Matthias Arand, Jovana Roessner, Albert Malfertheiner, Peter |
author_facet | Peitz, Ulrich Vieth, Michael Evert, Matthias Arand, Jovana Roessner, Albert Malfertheiner, Peter |
author_sort | Peitz, Ulrich |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The previously reported prevalence of gastric heterotopia in the cervical esophagus, also termed inlet patch (IP), varies substantially, ranging from 0.18 to 14%. Regarding cases with adenocarcinoma within IP, some experts recommend to routinely obtain biopsies from IP for histopathology. Another concern is the reported relation to Barrett’s esophagus. The objectives of the study were to prospectively determine the prevalence of IP and of preneoplasia within IP, and to investigate the association between IP and Barrett’s esophagus. METHODS: 372 consecutive patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy were carefully searched for the presence of IP. Biopsies for histopathology were targeted to the IP, columnar metaplasia of the lower esophagus, gastric corpus and antrum. Different definitions of Barrett’s esophagus were tested for an association with IP. RESULTS: At least one IP was endoscopically identified in 53 patients (14.5%). Histopathology, performed in 46 patients, confirmed columnar epithelium in 87% of cases, which essentially presented corpus and/or cardia-type mucosa. Intestinal metaplasia was detected in two cases, but no neoplasia. A previously reported association of IP with Barrett’s esophagus was weak, statistically significant only when short segments of cardia-type mucosa of the lower esophagus were included in the definition of Barrett’s esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IP seems to be underestimated, but preneoplasia within IP is rare, which does not support the recommendation to regularly obtain biopsies for histopathology. Biopsies should be targeted to any irregularities within the heterotopic mucosa. The correlation of IP with Barrett’s esophagus hints to a partly common pathogenesis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5508702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55087022017-07-17 The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus Peitz, Ulrich Vieth, Michael Evert, Matthias Arand, Jovana Roessner, Albert Malfertheiner, Peter BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: The previously reported prevalence of gastric heterotopia in the cervical esophagus, also termed inlet patch (IP), varies substantially, ranging from 0.18 to 14%. Regarding cases with adenocarcinoma within IP, some experts recommend to routinely obtain biopsies from IP for histopathology. Another concern is the reported relation to Barrett’s esophagus. The objectives of the study were to prospectively determine the prevalence of IP and of preneoplasia within IP, and to investigate the association between IP and Barrett’s esophagus. METHODS: 372 consecutive patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy were carefully searched for the presence of IP. Biopsies for histopathology were targeted to the IP, columnar metaplasia of the lower esophagus, gastric corpus and antrum. Different definitions of Barrett’s esophagus were tested for an association with IP. RESULTS: At least one IP was endoscopically identified in 53 patients (14.5%). Histopathology, performed in 46 patients, confirmed columnar epithelium in 87% of cases, which essentially presented corpus and/or cardia-type mucosa. Intestinal metaplasia was detected in two cases, but no neoplasia. A previously reported association of IP with Barrett’s esophagus was weak, statistically significant only when short segments of cardia-type mucosa of the lower esophagus were included in the definition of Barrett’s esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IP seems to be underestimated, but preneoplasia within IP is rare, which does not support the recommendation to regularly obtain biopsies for histopathology. Biopsies should be targeted to any irregularities within the heterotopic mucosa. The correlation of IP with Barrett’s esophagus hints to a partly common pathogenesis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5508702/ /pubmed/28701149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peitz, Ulrich Vieth, Michael Evert, Matthias Arand, Jovana Roessner, Albert Malfertheiner, Peter The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus |
title | The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus |
title_full | The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus |
title_short | The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus |
title_sort | prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with barrett’s esophagus |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0644-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peitzulrich theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT viethmichael theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT evertmatthias theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT arandjovana theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT roessneralbert theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT malfertheinerpeter theprevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT peitzulrich prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT viethmichael prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT evertmatthias prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT arandjovana prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT roessneralbert prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus AT malfertheinerpeter prevalenceofgastricheterotopiaoftheproximalesophagusisunderestimatedbutpreneoplasiaisrarecorrelationwithbarrettsesophagus |