Cargando…

Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review

The involvement of the right and left hemispheres in mediating language functions has been measured in a variety of ways over the centuries since the relative dominance of the left hemisphere was first known. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) presents a useful non-invasive method of asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradshaw, Abigail R., Bishop, Dorothy V.M., Woodhead, Zoe V.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713656
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3557
_version_ 1783249938585485312
author Bradshaw, Abigail R.
Bishop, Dorothy V.M.
Woodhead, Zoe V.J.
author_facet Bradshaw, Abigail R.
Bishop, Dorothy V.M.
Woodhead, Zoe V.J.
author_sort Bradshaw, Abigail R.
collection PubMed
description The involvement of the right and left hemispheres in mediating language functions has been measured in a variety of ways over the centuries since the relative dominance of the left hemisphere was first known. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) presents a useful non-invasive method of assessing lateralisation that is being increasingly used in clinical practice and research. However, the methods used in the fMRI laterality literature currently are highly variable, making systematic comparisons across studies difficult. Here we consider the different methods of quantifying and classifying laterality that have been used in fMRI studies since 2000, with the aim of determining which give the most robust and reliable measurement. Recommendations are made with a view to informing future research to increase standardisation in fMRI laterality protocols. In particular, the findings reinforce the importance of threshold-independent methods for calculating laterality indices, and the benefits of assessing heterogeneity of language laterality across multiple regions of interest and tasks. This systematic review was registered as a protocol on Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/hyvc4/.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5508809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55088092017-07-14 Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review Bradshaw, Abigail R. Bishop, Dorothy V.M. Woodhead, Zoe V.J. PeerJ Neuroscience The involvement of the right and left hemispheres in mediating language functions has been measured in a variety of ways over the centuries since the relative dominance of the left hemisphere was first known. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) presents a useful non-invasive method of assessing lateralisation that is being increasingly used in clinical practice and research. However, the methods used in the fMRI laterality literature currently are highly variable, making systematic comparisons across studies difficult. Here we consider the different methods of quantifying and classifying laterality that have been used in fMRI studies since 2000, with the aim of determining which give the most robust and reliable measurement. Recommendations are made with a view to informing future research to increase standardisation in fMRI laterality protocols. In particular, the findings reinforce the importance of threshold-independent methods for calculating laterality indices, and the benefits of assessing heterogeneity of language laterality across multiple regions of interest and tasks. This systematic review was registered as a protocol on Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/hyvc4/. PeerJ Inc. 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5508809/ /pubmed/28713656 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3557 Text en ©2017 Bradshaw et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bradshaw, Abigail R.
Bishop, Dorothy V.M.
Woodhead, Zoe V.J.
Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review
title Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review
title_full Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review
title_fullStr Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review
title_short Methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fMRI: a systematic review
title_sort methodological considerations in assessment of language lateralisation with fmri: a systematic review
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713656
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3557
work_keys_str_mv AT bradshawabigailr methodologicalconsiderationsinassessmentoflanguagelateralisationwithfmriasystematicreview
AT bishopdorothyvm methodologicalconsiderationsinassessmentoflanguagelateralisationwithfmriasystematicreview
AT woodheadzoevj methodologicalconsiderationsinassessmentoflanguagelateralisationwithfmriasystematicreview