Cargando…

Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis

BACKGROUND: Formal thought disorder is a cardinal feature of psychosis. However, the extent to which formal thought disorder is evident in ultra-high-risk individuals and whether it is linked to the progression to psychosis remains unclear. AIMS: Examine the severity of formal thought disorder in ul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demjaha, Arsime, Weinstein, Sara, Stahl, Daniel, Day, Fern, Valmaggia, Lucia, Rutigliano, Grazia, De Micheli, Andrea, Fusar-Poli, Paolo, McGuire, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5509964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.004408
_version_ 1783250103158439936
author Demjaha, Arsime
Weinstein, Sara
Stahl, Daniel
Day, Fern
Valmaggia, Lucia
Rutigliano, Grazia
De Micheli, Andrea
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
McGuire, Philip
author_facet Demjaha, Arsime
Weinstein, Sara
Stahl, Daniel
Day, Fern
Valmaggia, Lucia
Rutigliano, Grazia
De Micheli, Andrea
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
McGuire, Philip
author_sort Demjaha, Arsime
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Formal thought disorder is a cardinal feature of psychosis. However, the extent to which formal thought disorder is evident in ultra-high-risk individuals and whether it is linked to the progression to psychosis remains unclear. AIMS: Examine the severity of formal thought disorder in ultra-high-risk participants and its association with future psychosis. METHOD: The Thought and Language Index (TLI) was used to assess 24 ultra-high-risk participants, 16 people with first-episode psychosis and 13 healthy controls. Ultra-high-risk individuals were followed up for a mean duration of 7 years (s.d.=1.5) to determine the relationship between formal thought disorder at baseline and transition to psychosis. RESULTS: TLI scores were significantly greater in the ultra-high-risk group compared with the healthy control group (effect size (ES)=1.2), but lower than in people with first-episode psychosis (ES=0.8). Total and negative TLI scores were higher in ultra-high-risk individuals who developed psychosis, but this was not significant. Combining negative TLI scores with attenuated psychotic symptoms and basic symptoms predicted transition to psychosis (P=0.04; ES=1.04). CONCLUSIONS: TLI is beneficial in evaluating formal thought disorder in ultra-high-risk participants, and complements existing instruments for the evaluation of psychopathology in this group. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5509964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal College of Psychiatrists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55099642017-07-14 Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis Demjaha, Arsime Weinstein, Sara Stahl, Daniel Day, Fern Valmaggia, Lucia Rutigliano, Grazia De Micheli, Andrea Fusar-Poli, Paolo McGuire, Philip BJPsych Open Paper BACKGROUND: Formal thought disorder is a cardinal feature of psychosis. However, the extent to which formal thought disorder is evident in ultra-high-risk individuals and whether it is linked to the progression to psychosis remains unclear. AIMS: Examine the severity of formal thought disorder in ultra-high-risk participants and its association with future psychosis. METHOD: The Thought and Language Index (TLI) was used to assess 24 ultra-high-risk participants, 16 people with first-episode psychosis and 13 healthy controls. Ultra-high-risk individuals were followed up for a mean duration of 7 years (s.d.=1.5) to determine the relationship between formal thought disorder at baseline and transition to psychosis. RESULTS: TLI scores were significantly greater in the ultra-high-risk group compared with the healthy control group (effect size (ES)=1.2), but lower than in people with first-episode psychosis (ES=0.8). Total and negative TLI scores were higher in ultra-high-risk individuals who developed psychosis, but this was not significant. Combining negative TLI scores with attenuated psychotic symptoms and basic symptoms predicted transition to psychosis (P=0.04; ES=1.04). CONCLUSIONS: TLI is beneficial in evaluating formal thought disorder in ultra-high-risk participants, and complements existing instruments for the evaluation of psychopathology in this group. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license. The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5509964/ /pubmed/28713586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.004408 Text en © 2017 The Royal College of Psychiatrists http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Paper
Demjaha, Arsime
Weinstein, Sara
Stahl, Daniel
Day, Fern
Valmaggia, Lucia
Rutigliano, Grazia
De Micheli, Andrea
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
McGuire, Philip
Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis
title Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis
title_full Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis
title_fullStr Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis
title_full_unstemmed Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis
title_short Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis
title_sort formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5509964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.004408
work_keys_str_mv AT demjahaarsime formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis
AT weinsteinsara formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis
AT stahldaniel formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis
AT dayfern formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis
AT valmaggialucia formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis
AT rutiglianograzia formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis
AT demicheliandrea formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis
AT fusarpolipaolo formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis
AT mcguirephilip formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis