Cargando…
Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis
BACKGROUND: Formal thought disorder is a cardinal feature of psychosis. However, the extent to which formal thought disorder is evident in ultra-high-risk individuals and whether it is linked to the progression to psychosis remains unclear. AIMS: Examine the severity of formal thought disorder in ul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal College of Psychiatrists
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5509964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.004408 |
_version_ | 1783250103158439936 |
---|---|
author | Demjaha, Arsime Weinstein, Sara Stahl, Daniel Day, Fern Valmaggia, Lucia Rutigliano, Grazia De Micheli, Andrea Fusar-Poli, Paolo McGuire, Philip |
author_facet | Demjaha, Arsime Weinstein, Sara Stahl, Daniel Day, Fern Valmaggia, Lucia Rutigliano, Grazia De Micheli, Andrea Fusar-Poli, Paolo McGuire, Philip |
author_sort | Demjaha, Arsime |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Formal thought disorder is a cardinal feature of psychosis. However, the extent to which formal thought disorder is evident in ultra-high-risk individuals and whether it is linked to the progression to psychosis remains unclear. AIMS: Examine the severity of formal thought disorder in ultra-high-risk participants and its association with future psychosis. METHOD: The Thought and Language Index (TLI) was used to assess 24 ultra-high-risk participants, 16 people with first-episode psychosis and 13 healthy controls. Ultra-high-risk individuals were followed up for a mean duration of 7 years (s.d.=1.5) to determine the relationship between formal thought disorder at baseline and transition to psychosis. RESULTS: TLI scores were significantly greater in the ultra-high-risk group compared with the healthy control group (effect size (ES)=1.2), but lower than in people with first-episode psychosis (ES=0.8). Total and negative TLI scores were higher in ultra-high-risk individuals who developed psychosis, but this was not significant. Combining negative TLI scores with attenuated psychotic symptoms and basic symptoms predicted transition to psychosis (P=0.04; ES=1.04). CONCLUSIONS: TLI is beneficial in evaluating formal thought disorder in ultra-high-risk participants, and complements existing instruments for the evaluation of psychopathology in this group. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5509964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Royal College of Psychiatrists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55099642017-07-14 Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis Demjaha, Arsime Weinstein, Sara Stahl, Daniel Day, Fern Valmaggia, Lucia Rutigliano, Grazia De Micheli, Andrea Fusar-Poli, Paolo McGuire, Philip BJPsych Open Paper BACKGROUND: Formal thought disorder is a cardinal feature of psychosis. However, the extent to which formal thought disorder is evident in ultra-high-risk individuals and whether it is linked to the progression to psychosis remains unclear. AIMS: Examine the severity of formal thought disorder in ultra-high-risk participants and its association with future psychosis. METHOD: The Thought and Language Index (TLI) was used to assess 24 ultra-high-risk participants, 16 people with first-episode psychosis and 13 healthy controls. Ultra-high-risk individuals were followed up for a mean duration of 7 years (s.d.=1.5) to determine the relationship between formal thought disorder at baseline and transition to psychosis. RESULTS: TLI scores were significantly greater in the ultra-high-risk group compared with the healthy control group (effect size (ES)=1.2), but lower than in people with first-episode psychosis (ES=0.8). Total and negative TLI scores were higher in ultra-high-risk individuals who developed psychosis, but this was not significant. Combining negative TLI scores with attenuated psychotic symptoms and basic symptoms predicted transition to psychosis (P=0.04; ES=1.04). CONCLUSIONS: TLI is beneficial in evaluating formal thought disorder in ultra-high-risk participants, and complements existing instruments for the evaluation of psychopathology in this group. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license. The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5509964/ /pubmed/28713586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.004408 Text en © 2017 The Royal College of Psychiatrists http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Paper Demjaha, Arsime Weinstein, Sara Stahl, Daniel Day, Fern Valmaggia, Lucia Rutigliano, Grazia De Micheli, Andrea Fusar-Poli, Paolo McGuire, Philip Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis |
title | Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis |
title_full | Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis |
title_fullStr | Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis |
title_short | Formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis |
title_sort | formal thought disorder in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis |
topic | Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5509964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.004408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demjahaarsime formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis AT weinsteinsara formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis AT stahldaniel formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis AT dayfern formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis AT valmaggialucia formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis AT rutiglianograzia formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis AT demicheliandrea formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis AT fusarpolipaolo formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis AT mcguirephilip formalthoughtdisorderinpeopleatultrahighriskofpsychosis |