Vibrational Excitation of H(2) Scattering from Cu(111): Effects of Surface Temperature and of Allowing Energy Exchange with the Surface

[Image: see text] In scattering of H(2) from Cu(111), vibrational excitation has so far defied an accurate theoretical description. To expose the causes of the large discrepancies with experiment, we investigate how the feature due to vibrational excitation (the “gain peak”) in the simulated time-of-flight spectrum of (v = 1, j = 3) H(2) scattering from Cu(111) depends on the surface temperature (T(s)) and the possibility of energy exchange with surface phonons and electron–hole pairs (ehp’s). Quasi-classical dynamics calculations are performed on the basis of accurate semiempirical density functionals for the interaction with H(2) + Cu(111). The methods used include the quasi-classical trajectory method within the Born–Oppenheimer static surface model, the generalized Langevin oscillator (GLO) method incorporating energy transfer to surface phonons, the GLO + friction (GLO+F) method also incorporating energy exchange with ehp’s, and ab initio molecular dynamics with electronic friction (AIMDEF). Of the quasi-classical methods tested, comparison with AIMDEF suggests that the GLO+F method is accurate enough to describe vibrational excitation as measured in the experiments. The GLO+F calculations also suggest that the promoting effect of raising T(s) on the measured vibrational excitation is due to an electronically nonadiabatic mechanism. However, by itself, enabling energy exchange with the surface by modeling surface phonons and ehp’s leads to reduced vibrational excitation, further decreasing the agreement with experiment. The simulated gain peak is quite sensitive to energy shifts in calculated vibrational excitation probabilities and to shifts in a specific experimental parameter (the chopper opening time). While the GLO+F calculations allow important qualitative conclusions, comparison to quantum dynamics results suggests that, with the quasi-classical way of describing nuclear motion and the present box quantization method for assigning the final vibrational state, the gain peak is not yet described with quantitative accuracy. Ways in which this problem might be resolved in the future are discussed.