Cargando…

Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements

OBJECTIVE: To compare three different body fats estimation equations using skin fold measurements with bioelectrical impedance analysis. METHODS: A total of 130 subjects were included from Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Services Hospital, Lahore from 1(st) April 2016 to 30(th) Sep. 2016...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naz, Hafeeza, Mushtaq, Kinza, Butt, Bilal Azeem, Khawaja, Khadija Irfan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811785
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.333.12806
_version_ 1783250123105501184
author Naz, Hafeeza
Mushtaq, Kinza
Butt, Bilal Azeem
Khawaja, Khadija Irfan
author_facet Naz, Hafeeza
Mushtaq, Kinza
Butt, Bilal Azeem
Khawaja, Khadija Irfan
author_sort Naz, Hafeeza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare three different body fats estimation equations using skin fold measurements with bioelectrical impedance analysis. METHODS: A total of 130 subjects were included from Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Services Hospital, Lahore from 1(st) April 2016 to 30(th) Sep. 2016. The triceps, biceps, subscapular, chest, thigh, abdominal, suprailiac skinfold thickness of the subjects was measured with skin-fold calipers (Harpenden) on non-dominant side. The percentage fat mass (%FM) predicted by using each skin-fold-thickness equations namely Durnin & Womersley, Jackson & Pollock and Sloan was compared with %FM measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA). RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 48.75±10.7 years, mean BMI was 29.08±6.09 kg/m(2). The mean %FM calculated by Durnin & Womersley (32.408±0.584), Jackson & Pollock (24.658±0.527), Sloan (20.40±0.545). The %FM by BIA was 38.182±0.529. All three equations showed positive correlation but underestimated %FM as compared to BIA. CONCLUSION: All three BF estimation equations underestimate body fat percentage compared to BIA. Among the three, Durnin & Womersley equation shows best positive correlation and hence it can be used for estimation of percentage fat mass as an alternate to BIA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5510117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55101172017-08-15 Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements Naz, Hafeeza Mushtaq, Kinza Butt, Bilal Azeem Khawaja, Khadija Irfan Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare three different body fats estimation equations using skin fold measurements with bioelectrical impedance analysis. METHODS: A total of 130 subjects were included from Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Services Hospital, Lahore from 1(st) April 2016 to 30(th) Sep. 2016. The triceps, biceps, subscapular, chest, thigh, abdominal, suprailiac skinfold thickness of the subjects was measured with skin-fold calipers (Harpenden) on non-dominant side. The percentage fat mass (%FM) predicted by using each skin-fold-thickness equations namely Durnin & Womersley, Jackson & Pollock and Sloan was compared with %FM measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA). RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 48.75±10.7 years, mean BMI was 29.08±6.09 kg/m(2). The mean %FM calculated by Durnin & Womersley (32.408±0.584), Jackson & Pollock (24.658±0.527), Sloan (20.40±0.545). The %FM by BIA was 38.182±0.529. All three equations showed positive correlation but underestimated %FM as compared to BIA. CONCLUSION: All three BF estimation equations underestimate body fat percentage compared to BIA. Among the three, Durnin & Womersley equation shows best positive correlation and hence it can be used for estimation of percentage fat mass as an alternate to BIA. Professional Medical Publications 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5510117/ /pubmed/28811785 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.333.12806 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Naz, Hafeeza
Mushtaq, Kinza
Butt, Bilal Azeem
Khawaja, Khadija Irfan
Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements
title Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements
title_full Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements
title_fullStr Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements
title_short Estimation of body fat in Pakistani adult: A comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements
title_sort estimation of body fat in pakistani adult: a comparison of equations based upon skinfold thickness measurements
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811785
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.333.12806
work_keys_str_mv AT nazhafeeza estimationofbodyfatinpakistaniadultacomparisonofequationsbaseduponskinfoldthicknessmeasurements
AT mushtaqkinza estimationofbodyfatinpakistaniadultacomparisonofequationsbaseduponskinfoldthicknessmeasurements
AT buttbilalazeem estimationofbodyfatinpakistaniadultacomparisonofequationsbaseduponskinfoldthicknessmeasurements
AT khawajakhadijairfan estimationofbodyfatinpakistaniadultacomparisonofequationsbaseduponskinfoldthicknessmeasurements