Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin as monotherapy for LUTS in BPH – a double-blind randomized trial
INTRODUCTION: Currently alpha1-adrenoceptor blockers (AB) are widely used as first-line therapy to improve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We compared the efficacy and safety profile of tamsulosin, alfuzosin and silodosin in LUTS due to BPH. MA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28721281 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2017.924 |
_version_ | 1783250164449804288 |
---|---|
author | Manohar, Chikka Moga Siddaiah Nagabhushana, Mahadevappa Karthikeyan, Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Sanjay, Ramachandra Pudakalkatti Kamath, Ananth Janardhan Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah |
author_facet | Manohar, Chikka Moga Siddaiah Nagabhushana, Mahadevappa Karthikeyan, Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Sanjay, Ramachandra Pudakalkatti Kamath, Ananth Janardhan Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah |
author_sort | Manohar, Chikka Moga Siddaiah |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Currently alpha1-adrenoceptor blockers (AB) are widely used as first-line therapy to improve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We compared the efficacy and safety profile of tamsulosin, alfuzosin and silodosin in LUTS due to BPH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive consenting male patients (N = 269) undergoing medical management of BPH with AB from February 2012 to October 2015 were enrolled. Patients were randomized to a 0.4 mg tamsulosin (group T), 10 mg alfuzosin (group A) or a 8 mg silodosin (group S) by double-blind randomization. All patients were assessed for improvements and post-void residual urine (PVR) and for adverse drug events (ADE). RESULTS: IPSS showed significant improvement in Group S at the first week (11.7 ±4.18, p = 0.027) and at 3 months (7.97 ±3.84, p = 0.020). QOL showed significant improvement at 1 (2.2 ±0.76, p = 0.020), 4 (1.47 ±0.63, p <0.001) and 12 (1.2 ±0.66, p <0.001) weeks in Group S. The mean Qmax improvement was the maximum (13.76 ±2.44, p = 0.028) in Group S at 1 week. Reduction in PVR was the maximum in Group S, but it was not statistically significant. Adverse drug events (ADE) were observed in 20.07% (54/269) patients and distribution was similar in the three groups with decreasing incidence with progression of time. CONCLUSIONS: Silodosin is the most efficacious AB with rapid onset of action. Silodosin also improves the quality of life in patients with LUTS due to BPH and objectively improves maximum flow rate. However, silodosin has more adverse events when compared to tamsulosin and alfuzosin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5510335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55103352017-07-18 Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin as monotherapy for LUTS in BPH – a double-blind randomized trial Manohar, Chikka Moga Siddaiah Nagabhushana, Mahadevappa Karthikeyan, Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Sanjay, Ramachandra Pudakalkatti Kamath, Ananth Janardhan Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Currently alpha1-adrenoceptor blockers (AB) are widely used as first-line therapy to improve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We compared the efficacy and safety profile of tamsulosin, alfuzosin and silodosin in LUTS due to BPH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive consenting male patients (N = 269) undergoing medical management of BPH with AB from February 2012 to October 2015 were enrolled. Patients were randomized to a 0.4 mg tamsulosin (group T), 10 mg alfuzosin (group A) or a 8 mg silodosin (group S) by double-blind randomization. All patients were assessed for improvements and post-void residual urine (PVR) and for adverse drug events (ADE). RESULTS: IPSS showed significant improvement in Group S at the first week (11.7 ±4.18, p = 0.027) and at 3 months (7.97 ±3.84, p = 0.020). QOL showed significant improvement at 1 (2.2 ±0.76, p = 0.020), 4 (1.47 ±0.63, p <0.001) and 12 (1.2 ±0.66, p <0.001) weeks in Group S. The mean Qmax improvement was the maximum (13.76 ±2.44, p = 0.028) in Group S at 1 week. Reduction in PVR was the maximum in Group S, but it was not statistically significant. Adverse drug events (ADE) were observed in 20.07% (54/269) patients and distribution was similar in the three groups with decreasing incidence with progression of time. CONCLUSIONS: Silodosin is the most efficacious AB with rapid onset of action. Silodosin also improves the quality of life in patients with LUTS due to BPH and objectively improves maximum flow rate. However, silodosin has more adverse events when compared to tamsulosin and alfuzosin. Polish Urological Association 2017-06-07 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5510335/ /pubmed/28721281 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2017.924 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Manohar, Chikka Moga Siddaiah Nagabhushana, Mahadevappa Karthikeyan, Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Sanjay, Ramachandra Pudakalkatti Kamath, Ananth Janardhan Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin as monotherapy for LUTS in BPH – a double-blind randomized trial |
title | Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin as monotherapy for LUTS in BPH – a double-blind randomized trial |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin as monotherapy for LUTS in BPH – a double-blind randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin as monotherapy for LUTS in BPH – a double-blind randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin as monotherapy for LUTS in BPH – a double-blind randomized trial |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin as monotherapy for LUTS in BPH – a double-blind randomized trial |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin as monotherapy for luts in bph – a double-blind randomized trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28721281 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2017.924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manoharchikkamogasiddaiah safetyandefficacyoftamsulosinalfuzosinorsilodosinasmonotherapyforlutsinbphadoubleblindrandomizedtrial AT nagabhushanamahadevappa safetyandefficacyoftamsulosinalfuzosinorsilodosinasmonotherapyforlutsinbphadoubleblindrandomizedtrial AT karthikeyanvilvapathysenguttuvan safetyandefficacyoftamsulosinalfuzosinorsilodosinasmonotherapyforlutsinbphadoubleblindrandomizedtrial AT sanjayramachandrapudakalkatti safetyandefficacyoftamsulosinalfuzosinorsilodosinasmonotherapyforlutsinbphadoubleblindrandomizedtrial AT kamathananthjanardhan safetyandefficacyoftamsulosinalfuzosinorsilodosinasmonotherapyforlutsinbphadoubleblindrandomizedtrial AT keshavamurthyramaiah safetyandefficacyoftamsulosinalfuzosinorsilodosinasmonotherapyforlutsinbphadoubleblindrandomizedtrial |