Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy
BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between switching to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination eye drops (PG/timolol FCs) and adding brimonidine to PG analogue monotherapy. METHODS: Eyes of 53 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were receiving PG analogu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761569 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101711010156 |
_version_ | 1783250205067444224 |
---|---|
author | Inoue, Kenji Masumoto, Mieko Ishida, Kyoko Tomita, Goji |
author_facet | Inoue, Kenji Masumoto, Mieko Ishida, Kyoko Tomita, Goji |
author_sort | Inoue, Kenji |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between switching to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination eye drops (PG/timolol FCs) and adding brimonidine to PG analogue monotherapy. METHODS: Eyes of 53 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were receiving PG analogue monotherapy were included. Participants were randomly divided into two treatment groups: one was prescribed PG/timolol FCs (switched group), and for the other, 0.1% brimonidine was added to the PG analogue (added group). Intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, and pulse rate were measured after 1 and 3 months and compared to baseline values. Participants were also surveyed to determine if they had experienced systemic or topical adverse events at each study visit. IOP changes at 1 and 3 months were compared between groups. RESULTS: Three months after changing medication, mean IOP was 14.6 ± 2.4 mmHg in the switched group and 13.7 ± 1.8 mmHg in the added group; both were significantly lower than the baseline values (switched group, 16.5 ± 2.7 mmHg; added group, 15.8 ± 2.3 mmHg; both P < 0.001). Neither the mean nor the percentage reductions in IOP were significantly different between groups at 1 and 3 months. In the added group, diastolic blood pressure was lower than that at 1 and 3 months, systolic blood was lower than that at 3 months (P < 0.01). The patients who had experienced systemic or topical adverse events were 53.8% in the added group and 40.7% in the the changed group, which was equivalent between groups (P =0.4142). Three patients (11.5%) in the added group, but none from the switched group, were excluded from analyses because of adverse events (not significant, P = 0.217). CONCLUSION: Switching from a PG analogue to PG/timolol FCs or to PG with brimonidine was equally safe (systemically and topically) and effective in reducing IOP. Thus, PG with brimonidine might be appropriate medication in patients who cannot use PG/timolol FCs due to repiratory or circulatory disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5510563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55105632017-07-31 Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy Inoue, Kenji Masumoto, Mieko Ishida, Kyoko Tomita, Goji Open Ophthalmol J Article BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between switching to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination eye drops (PG/timolol FCs) and adding brimonidine to PG analogue monotherapy. METHODS: Eyes of 53 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were receiving PG analogue monotherapy were included. Participants were randomly divided into two treatment groups: one was prescribed PG/timolol FCs (switched group), and for the other, 0.1% brimonidine was added to the PG analogue (added group). Intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, and pulse rate were measured after 1 and 3 months and compared to baseline values. Participants were also surveyed to determine if they had experienced systemic or topical adverse events at each study visit. IOP changes at 1 and 3 months were compared between groups. RESULTS: Three months after changing medication, mean IOP was 14.6 ± 2.4 mmHg in the switched group and 13.7 ± 1.8 mmHg in the added group; both were significantly lower than the baseline values (switched group, 16.5 ± 2.7 mmHg; added group, 15.8 ± 2.3 mmHg; both P < 0.001). Neither the mean nor the percentage reductions in IOP were significantly different between groups at 1 and 3 months. In the added group, diastolic blood pressure was lower than that at 1 and 3 months, systolic blood was lower than that at 3 months (P < 0.01). The patients who had experienced systemic or topical adverse events were 53.8% in the added group and 40.7% in the the changed group, which was equivalent between groups (P =0.4142). Three patients (11.5%) in the added group, but none from the switched group, were excluded from analyses because of adverse events (not significant, P = 0.217). CONCLUSION: Switching from a PG analogue to PG/timolol FCs or to PG with brimonidine was equally safe (systemically and topically) and effective in reducing IOP. Thus, PG with brimonidine might be appropriate medication in patients who cannot use PG/timolol FCs due to repiratory or circulatory disease. Bentham Open 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5510563/ /pubmed/28761569 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101711010156 Text en © 2017 Inoue et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Inoue, Kenji Masumoto, Mieko Ishida, Kyoko Tomita, Goji Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of switching from prostaglandin analog therapy to prostaglandin / timolol fixed combination or prostaglandin / brimonidine therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761569 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101711010156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inouekenji efficacyandsafetyofswitchingfromprostaglandinanalogtherapytoprostaglandintimololfixedcombinationorprostaglandinbrimonidinetherapy AT masumotomieko efficacyandsafetyofswitchingfromprostaglandinanalogtherapytoprostaglandintimololfixedcombinationorprostaglandinbrimonidinetherapy AT ishidakyoko efficacyandsafetyofswitchingfromprostaglandinanalogtherapytoprostaglandintimololfixedcombinationorprostaglandinbrimonidinetherapy AT tomitagoji efficacyandsafetyofswitchingfromprostaglandinanalogtherapytoprostaglandintimololfixedcombinationorprostaglandinbrimonidinetherapy |