Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy

BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between switching to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination eye drops (PG/timolol FCs) and adding brimonidine to PG analogue monotherapy. METHODS: Eyes of 53 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were receiving PG analogu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inoue, Kenji, Masumoto, Mieko, Ishida, Kyoko, Tomita, Goji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761569
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101711010156
_version_ 1783250205067444224
author Inoue, Kenji
Masumoto, Mieko
Ishida, Kyoko
Tomita, Goji
author_facet Inoue, Kenji
Masumoto, Mieko
Ishida, Kyoko
Tomita, Goji
author_sort Inoue, Kenji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between switching to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination eye drops (PG/timolol FCs) and adding brimonidine to PG analogue monotherapy. METHODS: Eyes of 53 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were receiving PG analogue monotherapy were included. Participants were randomly divided into two treatment groups: one was prescribed PG/timolol FCs (switched group), and for the other, 0.1% brimonidine was added to the PG analogue (added group). Intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, and pulse rate were measured after 1 and 3 months and compared to baseline values. Participants were also surveyed to determine if they had experienced systemic or topical adverse events at each study visit. IOP changes at 1 and 3 months were compared between groups. RESULTS: Three months after changing medication, mean IOP was 14.6 ± 2.4 mmHg in the switched group and 13.7 ± 1.8 mmHg in the added group; both were significantly lower than the baseline values (switched group, 16.5 ± 2.7 mmHg; added group, 15.8 ± 2.3 mmHg; both P < 0.001). Neither the mean nor the percentage reductions in IOP were significantly different between groups at 1 and 3 months. In the added group, diastolic blood pressure was lower than that at 1 and 3 months, systolic blood was lower than that at 3 months (P < 0.01). The patients who had experienced systemic or topical adverse events were 53.8% in the added group and 40.7% in the the changed group, which was equivalent between groups (P =0.4142). Three patients (11.5%) in the added group, but none from the switched group, were excluded from analyses because of adverse events (not significant, P = 0.217). CONCLUSION: Switching from a PG analogue to PG/timolol FCs or to PG with brimonidine was equally safe (systemically and topically) and effective in reducing IOP. Thus, PG with brimonidine might be appropriate medication in patients who cannot use PG/timolol FCs due to repiratory or circulatory disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5510563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55105632017-07-31 Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy Inoue, Kenji Masumoto, Mieko Ishida, Kyoko Tomita, Goji Open Ophthalmol J Article BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between switching to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination eye drops (PG/timolol FCs) and adding brimonidine to PG analogue monotherapy. METHODS: Eyes of 53 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were receiving PG analogue monotherapy were included. Participants were randomly divided into two treatment groups: one was prescribed PG/timolol FCs (switched group), and for the other, 0.1% brimonidine was added to the PG analogue (added group). Intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, and pulse rate were measured after 1 and 3 months and compared to baseline values. Participants were also surveyed to determine if they had experienced systemic or topical adverse events at each study visit. IOP changes at 1 and 3 months were compared between groups. RESULTS: Three months after changing medication, mean IOP was 14.6 ± 2.4 mmHg in the switched group and 13.7 ± 1.8 mmHg in the added group; both were significantly lower than the baseline values (switched group, 16.5 ± 2.7 mmHg; added group, 15.8 ± 2.3 mmHg; both P < 0.001). Neither the mean nor the percentage reductions in IOP were significantly different between groups at 1 and 3 months. In the added group, diastolic blood pressure was lower than that at 1 and 3 months, systolic blood was lower than that at 3 months (P < 0.01). The patients who had experienced systemic or topical adverse events were 53.8% in the added group and 40.7% in the the changed group, which was equivalent between groups (P =0.4142). Three patients (11.5%) in the added group, but none from the switched group, were excluded from analyses because of adverse events (not significant, P = 0.217). CONCLUSION: Switching from a PG analogue to PG/timolol FCs or to PG with brimonidine was equally safe (systemically and topically) and effective in reducing IOP. Thus, PG with brimonidine might be appropriate medication in patients who cannot use PG/timolol FCs due to repiratory or circulatory disease. Bentham Open 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5510563/ /pubmed/28761569 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101711010156 Text en © 2017 Inoue et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Inoue, Kenji
Masumoto, Mieko
Ishida, Kyoko
Tomita, Goji
Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy
title Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Prostaglandin Analog Therapy to Prostaglandin / Timolol Fixed Combination or Prostaglandin / Brimonidine Therapy
title_sort efficacy and safety of switching from prostaglandin analog therapy to prostaglandin / timolol fixed combination or prostaglandin / brimonidine therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761569
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101711010156
work_keys_str_mv AT inouekenji efficacyandsafetyofswitchingfromprostaglandinanalogtherapytoprostaglandintimololfixedcombinationorprostaglandinbrimonidinetherapy
AT masumotomieko efficacyandsafetyofswitchingfromprostaglandinanalogtherapytoprostaglandintimololfixedcombinationorprostaglandinbrimonidinetherapy
AT ishidakyoko efficacyandsafetyofswitchingfromprostaglandinanalogtherapytoprostaglandintimololfixedcombinationorprostaglandinbrimonidinetherapy
AT tomitagoji efficacyandsafetyofswitchingfromprostaglandinanalogtherapytoprostaglandintimololfixedcombinationorprostaglandinbrimonidinetherapy