Cargando…
Missing in action: Species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modelling
The central role of species competition in shaping community structure in ecosystems is well appreciated amongst ecologists. However species competition is a consistently missing variable in Species Distribution Modelling (SDM). This study presents results of our attempt to incorporate species compe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28708854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181088 |
_version_ | 1783250238831591424 |
---|---|
author | Mpakairi, Kudzai Shaun Ndaimani, Henry Tagwireyi, Paradzayi Gara, Tawanda Winmore Zvidzai, Mark Madhlamoto, Daphine |
author_facet | Mpakairi, Kudzai Shaun Ndaimani, Henry Tagwireyi, Paradzayi Gara, Tawanda Winmore Zvidzai, Mark Madhlamoto, Daphine |
author_sort | Mpakairi, Kudzai Shaun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The central role of species competition in shaping community structure in ecosystems is well appreciated amongst ecologists. However species competition is a consistently missing variable in Species Distribution Modelling (SDM). This study presents results of our attempt to incorporate species competition in SDMs. We used a suit of predictor variables including Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), as well as distance from roads, settlements and water, fire frequency and distance from the nearest herbivore sighting (of selected herbivores) to model individual habitat preferences of five grazer species (buffalo, warthog, waterbuck, wildebeest and zebra) with the Ensemble SDM algorithm for Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe. Our results showed that distance from the nearest animal sighting (a proxy for competition among grazers) was the best predictor of the potential distribution of buffalo, wildebeest and zebra but the second best predictor for warthog and waterbuck. Our findings provide evidence to that competition is an important predictor of grazer species’ potential distribution. These findings suggest that species distribution modelling that neglects species competition may be inadequate in explaining the potential distribution of species. Therefore our findings encourage the inclusion of competition in SDM as well as potentially igniting discussions that may lead to improving the predictive power of future SDM efforts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5510852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55108522017-08-07 Missing in action: Species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modelling Mpakairi, Kudzai Shaun Ndaimani, Henry Tagwireyi, Paradzayi Gara, Tawanda Winmore Zvidzai, Mark Madhlamoto, Daphine PLoS One Research Article The central role of species competition in shaping community structure in ecosystems is well appreciated amongst ecologists. However species competition is a consistently missing variable in Species Distribution Modelling (SDM). This study presents results of our attempt to incorporate species competition in SDMs. We used a suit of predictor variables including Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), as well as distance from roads, settlements and water, fire frequency and distance from the nearest herbivore sighting (of selected herbivores) to model individual habitat preferences of five grazer species (buffalo, warthog, waterbuck, wildebeest and zebra) with the Ensemble SDM algorithm for Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe. Our results showed that distance from the nearest animal sighting (a proxy for competition among grazers) was the best predictor of the potential distribution of buffalo, wildebeest and zebra but the second best predictor for warthog and waterbuck. Our findings provide evidence to that competition is an important predictor of grazer species’ potential distribution. These findings suggest that species distribution modelling that neglects species competition may be inadequate in explaining the potential distribution of species. Therefore our findings encourage the inclusion of competition in SDM as well as potentially igniting discussions that may lead to improving the predictive power of future SDM efforts. Public Library of Science 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5510852/ /pubmed/28708854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181088 Text en © 2017 Mpakairi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mpakairi, Kudzai Shaun Ndaimani, Henry Tagwireyi, Paradzayi Gara, Tawanda Winmore Zvidzai, Mark Madhlamoto, Daphine Missing in action: Species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modelling |
title | Missing in action: Species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modelling |
title_full | Missing in action: Species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modelling |
title_fullStr | Missing in action: Species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modelling |
title_full_unstemmed | Missing in action: Species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modelling |
title_short | Missing in action: Species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modelling |
title_sort | missing in action: species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modelling |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28708854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mpakairikudzaishaun missinginactionspeciescompetitionisaneglectedpredictorvariableinspeciesdistributionmodelling AT ndaimanihenry missinginactionspeciescompetitionisaneglectedpredictorvariableinspeciesdistributionmodelling AT tagwireyiparadzayi missinginactionspeciescompetitionisaneglectedpredictorvariableinspeciesdistributionmodelling AT garatawandawinmore missinginactionspeciescompetitionisaneglectedpredictorvariableinspeciesdistributionmodelling AT zvidzaimark missinginactionspeciescompetitionisaneglectedpredictorvariableinspeciesdistributionmodelling AT madhlamotodaphine missinginactionspeciescompetitionisaneglectedpredictorvariableinspeciesdistributionmodelling |