Cargando…
Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background Postcesarean wound morbidity is a costly complication of cesarean delivery for which preventative strategies remain understudied. Objective We compared surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in cesarean patients receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) or standard-of-care (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603956 |
_version_ | 1783250270161993728 |
---|---|
author | Gunatilake, Ravindu P. Swamy, Geeta K. Brancazio, Leo R. Smrtka, Michael P. Thompson, Jennifer L. Gilner, Jennifer B. Gray, Beverly A. Heine, Robert Phillips |
author_facet | Gunatilake, Ravindu P. Swamy, Geeta K. Brancazio, Leo R. Smrtka, Michael P. Thompson, Jennifer L. Gilner, Jennifer B. Gray, Beverly A. Heine, Robert Phillips |
author_sort | Gunatilake, Ravindu P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Postcesarean wound morbidity is a costly complication of cesarean delivery for which preventative strategies remain understudied. Objective We compared surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in cesarean patients receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) or standard-of-care (SOC) dressing. Study Design A single-center randomized controlled trial compared ciNPT (5–7 days) to SOC dressing (1–2 days) in obese women (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35), undergoing cesarean delivery between 2012 and 2014. Participants were randomized 1:1 and monitored 42 ± 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome SSOs included unanticipated local inflammation, wound infection, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence, and need for surgical or antibiotic intervention. Results Of the 92 randomized patients, 82 completed the study. ciNPT and SOC groups had similar baseline characteristics. Mean BMI was 46.5 ± 6.5 and no treatment-related serious adverse events. Compared with SOC, the ciNPT group had fewer SSOs (7/43 [16.3%] vs. 2/39 [5.1%], respectively; p = 0.16); significantly fewer participants with less incisional pain both at rest (39/46 [84.8%] vs. 20/46 [43.5%]; p < 0.001) and with incisional pressure (42/46 [91.3%] vs. 25/46 [54.3%]; p < 0.001); and a 30% decrease in total opioid use (79.1 vs. 55.9 mg morphine equivalents, p = 0.036). Conclusion A trend in SSO reduction and a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain and narcotic use was observed in women using ciNPT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5511052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55110522017-07-17 Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Gunatilake, Ravindu P. Swamy, Geeta K. Brancazio, Leo R. Smrtka, Michael P. Thompson, Jennifer L. Gilner, Jennifer B. Gray, Beverly A. Heine, Robert Phillips AJP Rep Background Postcesarean wound morbidity is a costly complication of cesarean delivery for which preventative strategies remain understudied. Objective We compared surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in cesarean patients receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) or standard-of-care (SOC) dressing. Study Design A single-center randomized controlled trial compared ciNPT (5–7 days) to SOC dressing (1–2 days) in obese women (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35), undergoing cesarean delivery between 2012 and 2014. Participants were randomized 1:1 and monitored 42 ± 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome SSOs included unanticipated local inflammation, wound infection, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence, and need for surgical or antibiotic intervention. Results Of the 92 randomized patients, 82 completed the study. ciNPT and SOC groups had similar baseline characteristics. Mean BMI was 46.5 ± 6.5 and no treatment-related serious adverse events. Compared with SOC, the ciNPT group had fewer SSOs (7/43 [16.3%] vs. 2/39 [5.1%], respectively; p = 0.16); significantly fewer participants with less incisional pain both at rest (39/46 [84.8%] vs. 20/46 [43.5%]; p < 0.001) and with incisional pressure (42/46 [91.3%] vs. 25/46 [54.3%]; p < 0.001); and a 30% decrease in total opioid use (79.1 vs. 55.9 mg morphine equivalents, p = 0.036). Conclusion A trend in SSO reduction and a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain and narcotic use was observed in women using ciNPT. Thieme Medical Publishers 2017-07 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5511052/ /pubmed/28717587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603956 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Gunatilake, Ravindu P. Swamy, Geeta K. Brancazio, Leo R. Smrtka, Michael P. Thompson, Jennifer L. Gilner, Jennifer B. Gray, Beverly A. Heine, Robert Phillips Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | closed-incision negative-pressure therapy in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunatilakeravindup closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT swamygeetak closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brancazioleor closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT smrtkamichaelp closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thompsonjenniferl closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gilnerjenniferb closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT graybeverlya closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT heinerobertphillips closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial |