Cargando…

Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background  Postcesarean wound morbidity is a costly complication of cesarean delivery for which preventative strategies remain understudied. Objective  We compared surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in cesarean patients receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) or standard-of-care (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunatilake, Ravindu P., Swamy, Geeta K., Brancazio, Leo R., Smrtka, Michael P., Thompson, Jennifer L., Gilner, Jennifer B., Gray, Beverly A., Heine, Robert Phillips
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603956
_version_ 1783250270161993728
author Gunatilake, Ravindu P.
Swamy, Geeta K.
Brancazio, Leo R.
Smrtka, Michael P.
Thompson, Jennifer L.
Gilner, Jennifer B.
Gray, Beverly A.
Heine, Robert Phillips
author_facet Gunatilake, Ravindu P.
Swamy, Geeta K.
Brancazio, Leo R.
Smrtka, Michael P.
Thompson, Jennifer L.
Gilner, Jennifer B.
Gray, Beverly A.
Heine, Robert Phillips
author_sort Gunatilake, Ravindu P.
collection PubMed
description Background  Postcesarean wound morbidity is a costly complication of cesarean delivery for which preventative strategies remain understudied. Objective  We compared surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in cesarean patients receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) or standard-of-care (SOC) dressing. Study Design  A single-center randomized controlled trial compared ciNPT (5–7 days) to SOC dressing (1–2 days) in obese women (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35), undergoing cesarean delivery between 2012 and 2014. Participants were randomized 1:1 and monitored 42 ± 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome SSOs included unanticipated local inflammation, wound infection, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence, and need for surgical or antibiotic intervention. Results  Of the 92 randomized patients, 82 completed the study. ciNPT and SOC groups had similar baseline characteristics. Mean BMI was 46.5 ± 6.5 and no treatment-related serious adverse events. Compared with SOC, the ciNPT group had fewer SSOs (7/43 [16.3%] vs. 2/39 [5.1%], respectively; p  = 0.16); significantly fewer participants with less incisional pain both at rest (39/46 [84.8%] vs. 20/46 [43.5%]; p  < 0.001) and with incisional pressure (42/46 [91.3%] vs. 25/46 [54.3%]; p  < 0.001); and a 30% decrease in total opioid use (79.1 vs. 55.9 mg morphine equivalents, p  = 0.036). Conclusion  A trend in SSO reduction and a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain and narcotic use was observed in women using ciNPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5511052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55110522017-07-17 Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Gunatilake, Ravindu P. Swamy, Geeta K. Brancazio, Leo R. Smrtka, Michael P. Thompson, Jennifer L. Gilner, Jennifer B. Gray, Beverly A. Heine, Robert Phillips AJP Rep Background  Postcesarean wound morbidity is a costly complication of cesarean delivery for which preventative strategies remain understudied. Objective  We compared surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in cesarean patients receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) or standard-of-care (SOC) dressing. Study Design  A single-center randomized controlled trial compared ciNPT (5–7 days) to SOC dressing (1–2 days) in obese women (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35), undergoing cesarean delivery between 2012 and 2014. Participants were randomized 1:1 and monitored 42 ± 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome SSOs included unanticipated local inflammation, wound infection, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence, and need for surgical or antibiotic intervention. Results  Of the 92 randomized patients, 82 completed the study. ciNPT and SOC groups had similar baseline characteristics. Mean BMI was 46.5 ± 6.5 and no treatment-related serious adverse events. Compared with SOC, the ciNPT group had fewer SSOs (7/43 [16.3%] vs. 2/39 [5.1%], respectively; p  = 0.16); significantly fewer participants with less incisional pain both at rest (39/46 [84.8%] vs. 20/46 [43.5%]; p  < 0.001) and with incisional pressure (42/46 [91.3%] vs. 25/46 [54.3%]; p  < 0.001); and a 30% decrease in total opioid use (79.1 vs. 55.9 mg morphine equivalents, p  = 0.036). Conclusion  A trend in SSO reduction and a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain and narcotic use was observed in women using ciNPT. Thieme Medical Publishers 2017-07 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5511052/ /pubmed/28717587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603956 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Gunatilake, Ravindu P.
Swamy, Geeta K.
Brancazio, Leo R.
Smrtka, Michael P.
Thompson, Jennifer L.
Gilner, Jennifer B.
Gray, Beverly A.
Heine, Robert Phillips
Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort closed-incision negative-pressure therapy in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28717587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603956
work_keys_str_mv AT gunatilakeravindup closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT swamygeetak closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brancazioleor closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT smrtkamichaelp closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thompsonjenniferl closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gilnerjenniferb closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT graybeverlya closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heinerobertphillips closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinobesepatientsundergoingcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial