Cargando…

Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Clavicular shortening due to non-anatomical healing of displaced clavicular fractures is believed to have a negative effect on shoulder function after recovery. The evidence for this, however, is equivocal. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the available literature to determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woltz, Sarah, Sengab, Alysia, Krijnen, Pieta, Schipper, Inger B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28639075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2734-7
_version_ 1783250315826429952
author Woltz, Sarah
Sengab, Alysia
Krijnen, Pieta
Schipper, Inger B.
author_facet Woltz, Sarah
Sengab, Alysia
Krijnen, Pieta
Schipper, Inger B.
author_sort Woltz, Sarah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clavicular shortening due to non-anatomical healing of displaced clavicular fractures is believed to have a negative effect on shoulder function after recovery. The evidence for this, however, is equivocal. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the available literature to determine whether the current beliefs about clavicular shortening can be substantiated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Clinical Trial Registry were searched to identify all studies published in English that evaluated the association between clavicular shortening and shoulder function in patients aged ≥16 years with a nonoperatively treated, displaced midshaft clavicular fracture. Relevant data from the selected studies was extracted and summarized. Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the MINORS instrument. RESULTS: Six studies, of which five were retrospective, were included in this review analyzing a total of 379 patients. Due to heterogeneity in methods and reporting across studies, a pooled analysis of the results was not feasible. No clear associations were found between shortening and shoulder function scores (DASH and Constant score) or arm strength in each of the included studies. CONCLUSION: The existing evidence to date does not allow for a valid conclusion regarding the influence of shortening on shoulder function after union of nonoperatively treated midshaft clavicular fractures. Shortening alone is currently not an evidence-based indication to operate for the goal of functional improvement. Well-powered prospective comparative studies are needed to draw firm conclusions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00402-017-2734-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5511301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55113012017-07-31 Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review Woltz, Sarah Sengab, Alysia Krijnen, Pieta Schipper, Inger B. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery INTRODUCTION: Clavicular shortening due to non-anatomical healing of displaced clavicular fractures is believed to have a negative effect on shoulder function after recovery. The evidence for this, however, is equivocal. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the available literature to determine whether the current beliefs about clavicular shortening can be substantiated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Clinical Trial Registry were searched to identify all studies published in English that evaluated the association between clavicular shortening and shoulder function in patients aged ≥16 years with a nonoperatively treated, displaced midshaft clavicular fracture. Relevant data from the selected studies was extracted and summarized. Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the MINORS instrument. RESULTS: Six studies, of which five were retrospective, were included in this review analyzing a total of 379 patients. Due to heterogeneity in methods and reporting across studies, a pooled analysis of the results was not feasible. No clear associations were found between shortening and shoulder function scores (DASH and Constant score) or arm strength in each of the included studies. CONCLUSION: The existing evidence to date does not allow for a valid conclusion regarding the influence of shortening on shoulder function after union of nonoperatively treated midshaft clavicular fractures. Shortening alone is currently not an evidence-based indication to operate for the goal of functional improvement. Well-powered prospective comparative studies are needed to draw firm conclusions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00402-017-2734-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-06-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5511301/ /pubmed/28639075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2734-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Orthopaedic Surgery
Woltz, Sarah
Sengab, Alysia
Krijnen, Pieta
Schipper, Inger B.
Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review
title Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review
title_full Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review
title_fullStr Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review
title_short Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review
title_sort does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? a systematic review
topic Orthopaedic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28639075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2734-7
work_keys_str_mv AT woltzsarah doesclavicularshorteningafternonoperativetreatmentofmidshaftfracturesaffectshoulderfunctionasystematicreview
AT sengabalysia doesclavicularshorteningafternonoperativetreatmentofmidshaftfracturesaffectshoulderfunctionasystematicreview
AT krijnenpieta doesclavicularshorteningafternonoperativetreatmentofmidshaftfracturesaffectshoulderfunctionasystematicreview
AT schipperingerb doesclavicularshorteningafternonoperativetreatmentofmidshaftfracturesaffectshoulderfunctionasystematicreview