Cargando…
Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Xen Gel Stent and provide a macro- and microscopic analyses of bleb morphology. METHODS: A prospective 12-month study on patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Patients underwent implantation of the XEN Gel Stent (Allergan INC, Dublin, Irelan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9364910 |
_version_ | 1783250376596652032 |
---|---|
author | Fea, Antonio Maria Spinetta, Roberta Cannizzo, Paola Maria Loredana Consolandi, Giulia Lavia, Carlo Aragno, Vittoria Germinetti, Francesco Rolle, Teresa |
author_facet | Fea, Antonio Maria Spinetta, Roberta Cannizzo, Paola Maria Loredana Consolandi, Giulia Lavia, Carlo Aragno, Vittoria Germinetti, Francesco Rolle, Teresa |
author_sort | Fea, Antonio Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Xen Gel Stent and provide a macro- and microscopic analyses of bleb morphology. METHODS: A prospective 12-month study on patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Patients underwent implantation of the XEN Gel Stent (Allergan INC, Dublin, Ireland) either alone or combined with a cataract surgery. Biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were used to assess bleb morphology. Safety parameters were adverse events, best corrected visual acuity, visual field, and corneal endothelial cell loss. A postoperative IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without or on medications was respectively defined as complete and qualified success while an IOP ≥ 18 mmHg was defined as failure. RESULTS: Twelve eyes of 11 patients were evaluated. At one year, 5 out of 10 patients available achieved a complete success while five were qualified success. AS-OCT showed that bleb wall reflectivity was significantly higher in the failure group; IVCM revealed that stromal density was significantly lower in the success group. No safety issues were recorded. CONCLUSION: Implantation of the XEN Gel Stent appears to be a safe and effective procedure. AS-OCT and IVCM may be helpful in bleb assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5511657 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55116572017-07-27 Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent Fea, Antonio Maria Spinetta, Roberta Cannizzo, Paola Maria Loredana Consolandi, Giulia Lavia, Carlo Aragno, Vittoria Germinetti, Francesco Rolle, Teresa J Ophthalmol Clinical Study OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Xen Gel Stent and provide a macro- and microscopic analyses of bleb morphology. METHODS: A prospective 12-month study on patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Patients underwent implantation of the XEN Gel Stent (Allergan INC, Dublin, Ireland) either alone or combined with a cataract surgery. Biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were used to assess bleb morphology. Safety parameters were adverse events, best corrected visual acuity, visual field, and corneal endothelial cell loss. A postoperative IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without or on medications was respectively defined as complete and qualified success while an IOP ≥ 18 mmHg was defined as failure. RESULTS: Twelve eyes of 11 patients were evaluated. At one year, 5 out of 10 patients available achieved a complete success while five were qualified success. AS-OCT showed that bleb wall reflectivity was significantly higher in the failure group; IVCM revealed that stromal density was significantly lower in the success group. No safety issues were recorded. CONCLUSION: Implantation of the XEN Gel Stent appears to be a safe and effective procedure. AS-OCT and IVCM may be helpful in bleb assessment. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5511657/ /pubmed/28751986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9364910 Text en Copyright © 2017 Antonio Maria Fea et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Fea, Antonio Maria Spinetta, Roberta Cannizzo, Paola Maria Loredana Consolandi, Giulia Lavia, Carlo Aragno, Vittoria Germinetti, Francesco Rolle, Teresa Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent |
title | Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent |
title_full | Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent |
title_short | Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent |
title_sort | evaluation of bleb morphology and reduction in iop and glaucoma medication following implantation of a novel gel stent |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9364910 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feaantoniomaria evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent AT spinettaroberta evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent AT cannizzopaolamarialoredana evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent AT consolandigiulia evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent AT laviacarlo evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent AT aragnovittoria evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent AT germinettifrancesco evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent AT rolleteresa evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent |