Cargando…

Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Xen Gel Stent and provide a macro- and microscopic analyses of bleb morphology. METHODS: A prospective 12-month study on patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Patients underwent implantation of the XEN Gel Stent (Allergan INC, Dublin, Irelan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fea, Antonio Maria, Spinetta, Roberta, Cannizzo, Paola Maria Loredana, Consolandi, Giulia, Lavia, Carlo, Aragno, Vittoria, Germinetti, Francesco, Rolle, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9364910
_version_ 1783250376596652032
author Fea, Antonio Maria
Spinetta, Roberta
Cannizzo, Paola Maria Loredana
Consolandi, Giulia
Lavia, Carlo
Aragno, Vittoria
Germinetti, Francesco
Rolle, Teresa
author_facet Fea, Antonio Maria
Spinetta, Roberta
Cannizzo, Paola Maria Loredana
Consolandi, Giulia
Lavia, Carlo
Aragno, Vittoria
Germinetti, Francesco
Rolle, Teresa
author_sort Fea, Antonio Maria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Xen Gel Stent and provide a macro- and microscopic analyses of bleb morphology. METHODS: A prospective 12-month study on patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Patients underwent implantation of the XEN Gel Stent (Allergan INC, Dublin, Ireland) either alone or combined with a cataract surgery. Biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were used to assess bleb morphology. Safety parameters were adverse events, best corrected visual acuity, visual field, and corneal endothelial cell loss. A postoperative IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without or on medications was respectively defined as complete and qualified success while an IOP ≥ 18 mmHg was defined as failure. RESULTS: Twelve eyes of 11 patients were evaluated. At one year, 5 out of 10 patients available achieved a complete success while five were qualified success. AS-OCT showed that bleb wall reflectivity was significantly higher in the failure group; IVCM revealed that stromal density was significantly lower in the success group. No safety issues were recorded. CONCLUSION: Implantation of the XEN Gel Stent appears to be a safe and effective procedure. AS-OCT and IVCM may be helpful in bleb assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5511657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55116572017-07-27 Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent Fea, Antonio Maria Spinetta, Roberta Cannizzo, Paola Maria Loredana Consolandi, Giulia Lavia, Carlo Aragno, Vittoria Germinetti, Francesco Rolle, Teresa J Ophthalmol Clinical Study OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Xen Gel Stent and provide a macro- and microscopic analyses of bleb morphology. METHODS: A prospective 12-month study on patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Patients underwent implantation of the XEN Gel Stent (Allergan INC, Dublin, Ireland) either alone or combined with a cataract surgery. Biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were used to assess bleb morphology. Safety parameters were adverse events, best corrected visual acuity, visual field, and corneal endothelial cell loss. A postoperative IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without or on medications was respectively defined as complete and qualified success while an IOP ≥ 18 mmHg was defined as failure. RESULTS: Twelve eyes of 11 patients were evaluated. At one year, 5 out of 10 patients available achieved a complete success while five were qualified success. AS-OCT showed that bleb wall reflectivity was significantly higher in the failure group; IVCM revealed that stromal density was significantly lower in the success group. No safety issues were recorded. CONCLUSION: Implantation of the XEN Gel Stent appears to be a safe and effective procedure. AS-OCT and IVCM may be helpful in bleb assessment. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5511657/ /pubmed/28751986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9364910 Text en Copyright © 2017 Antonio Maria Fea et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Fea, Antonio Maria
Spinetta, Roberta
Cannizzo, Paola Maria Loredana
Consolandi, Giulia
Lavia, Carlo
Aragno, Vittoria
Germinetti, Francesco
Rolle, Teresa
Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent
title Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent
title_full Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent
title_fullStr Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent
title_short Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent
title_sort evaluation of bleb morphology and reduction in iop and glaucoma medication following implantation of a novel gel stent
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9364910
work_keys_str_mv AT feaantoniomaria evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent
AT spinettaroberta evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent
AT cannizzopaolamarialoredana evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent
AT consolandigiulia evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent
AT laviacarlo evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent
AT aragnovittoria evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent
AT germinettifrancesco evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent
AT rolleteresa evaluationofblebmorphologyandreductioniniopandglaucomamedicationfollowingimplantationofanovelgelstent