Cargando…
Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study
AIM: To determine cumulative success rate (CSR) of short and ultrashort implants in the posterior maxilla restored with single crowns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in 65 patients with 139 implants. 46 were ultrashort and 93 short. Implants were placed with a staged approa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8434281 |
_version_ | 1783250376857747456 |
---|---|
author | Lombardo, Giorgio Pighi, Jacopo Marincola, Mauro Corrocher, Giovanni Simancas-Pallares, Miguel Nocini, Pier Francesco |
author_facet | Lombardo, Giorgio Pighi, Jacopo Marincola, Mauro Corrocher, Giovanni Simancas-Pallares, Miguel Nocini, Pier Francesco |
author_sort | Lombardo, Giorgio |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To determine cumulative success rate (CSR) of short and ultrashort implants in the posterior maxilla restored with single crowns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in 65 patients with 139 implants. 46 were ultrashort and 93 short. Implants were placed with a staged approach and restored with single crowns. Success rate, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and crown-to-implant ratio (CIR) were assessed after three years. Statistical analysis was performed by descriptive and inferential statistics. A log-binomial regression model where the main outcome was implant success was achieved. Coefficients and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Analyses were performed with Stata 13.2 for Windows. RESULTS: 61.54% of patients were female and mean overall age was 51.9 ± 11.08 years old. Overall CSR was 97.1% (95% CI: 92.4–98.9): 97.9 and 95.1% for short and ultrashort, respectively (P value: 0.33). Four implants failed. Covariates were not associated with CSR (P value > 0.05). Regression model showed coefficients correlated with implant success for ultrashort implants (0.87) and most of covariates but none were statistically significant (P values > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that short and ultrashort implants may be successfully placed and restored with single crowns in the resorbed maxillary molar region. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5511658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55116582017-07-27 Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study Lombardo, Giorgio Pighi, Jacopo Marincola, Mauro Corrocher, Giovanni Simancas-Pallares, Miguel Nocini, Pier Francesco Int J Dent Clinical Study AIM: To determine cumulative success rate (CSR) of short and ultrashort implants in the posterior maxilla restored with single crowns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in 65 patients with 139 implants. 46 were ultrashort and 93 short. Implants were placed with a staged approach and restored with single crowns. Success rate, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and crown-to-implant ratio (CIR) were assessed after three years. Statistical analysis was performed by descriptive and inferential statistics. A log-binomial regression model where the main outcome was implant success was achieved. Coefficients and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Analyses were performed with Stata 13.2 for Windows. RESULTS: 61.54% of patients were female and mean overall age was 51.9 ± 11.08 years old. Overall CSR was 97.1% (95% CI: 92.4–98.9): 97.9 and 95.1% for short and ultrashort, respectively (P value: 0.33). Four implants failed. Covariates were not associated with CSR (P value > 0.05). Regression model showed coefficients correlated with implant success for ultrashort implants (0.87) and most of covariates but none were statistically significant (P values > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that short and ultrashort implants may be successfully placed and restored with single crowns in the resorbed maxillary molar region. Hindawi 2017 2017-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5511658/ /pubmed/28751913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8434281 Text en Copyright © 2017 Giorgio Lombardo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Lombardo, Giorgio Pighi, Jacopo Marincola, Mauro Corrocher, Giovanni Simancas-Pallares, Miguel Nocini, Pier Francesco Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study |
title | Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study |
title_full | Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study |
title_short | Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study |
title_sort | cumulative success rate of short and ultrashort implants supporting single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a 3-year retrospective study |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5511658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8434281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lombardogiorgio cumulativesuccessrateofshortandultrashortimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheposteriormaxillaa3yearretrospectivestudy AT pighijacopo cumulativesuccessrateofshortandultrashortimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheposteriormaxillaa3yearretrospectivestudy AT marincolamauro cumulativesuccessrateofshortandultrashortimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheposteriormaxillaa3yearretrospectivestudy AT corrochergiovanni cumulativesuccessrateofshortandultrashortimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheposteriormaxillaa3yearretrospectivestudy AT simancaspallaresmiguel cumulativesuccessrateofshortandultrashortimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheposteriormaxillaa3yearretrospectivestudy AT nocinipierfrancesco cumulativesuccessrateofshortandultrashortimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheposteriormaxillaa3yearretrospectivestudy |