Cargando…
A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
PURPOSE: The optimal perioperative treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination chemotherapies administered adjuvantly for cura...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Cancer Association
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857024 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.417 |
_version_ | 1783250471935279104 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Sung Hee Shim, Young Mog Park, Se Hoon Kim, Hong Kwan Choi, Young Soo Ahn, Myung-Ju Park, Keunchil Zo, Jae Ill Sun, Jong-Mu |
author_facet | Lim, Sung Hee Shim, Young Mog Park, Se Hoon Kim, Hong Kwan Choi, Young Soo Ahn, Myung-Ju Park, Keunchil Zo, Jae Ill Sun, Jong-Mu |
author_sort | Lim, Sung Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The optimal perioperative treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination chemotherapies administered adjuvantly for curatively-resected, node-positive ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with pathologically node-positive esophageal cancer after curative R0 resection were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX biweekly for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, 62 patients were randomized into the two treatment groups (32 in the LV5FU2 arm and 30 in the FOLFOX arm). The median age was 60 years and both groups had similar pathologic characteristics in tumor, nodal status, and location. Treatment completion rates were similarly high in both groups. The DFS rate at 12 months was 67% in the LV5FU2 group and 63% in the FOLFOX group with a hazard ratio of 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 2.62). After a median follow-up period of 27 months, the median DFS was 29.6 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 54.2) in the LV5FU2 arm and 16.8 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 26.1) in the FOLFOX arm (p=0.428), respectively, while the median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in patients in the FOLFOX arm than the LV5FU2 arm (20.0% vs. 3.1%). CONCLUSION: The addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) did not lead to better efficacy compared to LV5FU2 chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting in node-positive ESCC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5512359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Cancer Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55123592017-08-11 A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Lim, Sung Hee Shim, Young Mog Park, Se Hoon Kim, Hong Kwan Choi, Young Soo Ahn, Myung-Ju Park, Keunchil Zo, Jae Ill Sun, Jong-Mu Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: The optimal perioperative treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination chemotherapies administered adjuvantly for curatively-resected, node-positive ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with pathologically node-positive esophageal cancer after curative R0 resection were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX biweekly for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, 62 patients were randomized into the two treatment groups (32 in the LV5FU2 arm and 30 in the FOLFOX arm). The median age was 60 years and both groups had similar pathologic characteristics in tumor, nodal status, and location. Treatment completion rates were similarly high in both groups. The DFS rate at 12 months was 67% in the LV5FU2 group and 63% in the FOLFOX group with a hazard ratio of 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 2.62). After a median follow-up period of 27 months, the median DFS was 29.6 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 54.2) in the LV5FU2 arm and 16.8 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 26.1) in the FOLFOX arm (p=0.428), respectively, while the median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in patients in the FOLFOX arm than the LV5FU2 arm (20.0% vs. 3.1%). CONCLUSION: The addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) did not lead to better efficacy compared to LV5FU2 chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting in node-positive ESCC patients. Korean Cancer Association 2017-07 2016-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5512359/ /pubmed/27857024 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.417 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lim, Sung Hee Shim, Young Mog Park, Se Hoon Kim, Hong Kwan Choi, Young Soo Ahn, Myung-Ju Park, Keunchil Zo, Jae Ill Sun, Jong-Mu A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title | A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full | A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_short | A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_sort | randomized phase ii study of leucovorin/5-fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin (lv5fu2 vs. folfox) for curatively-resected, node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857024 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limsunghee arandomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT shimyoungmog arandomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT parksehoon arandomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT kimhongkwan arandomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT choiyoungsoo arandomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT ahnmyungju arandomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT parkkeunchil arandomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT zojaeill arandomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT sunjongmu arandomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT limsunghee randomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT shimyoungmog randomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT parksehoon randomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT kimhongkwan randomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT choiyoungsoo randomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT ahnmyungju randomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT parkkeunchil randomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT zojaeill randomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT sunjongmu randomizedphaseiistudyofleucovorin5fluorouracilwithorwithoutoxaliplatinlv5fu2vsfolfoxforcurativelyresectednodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma |