Cargando…

A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the re-challenge of S-1 or cisplatin in combination with docetaxel in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) that had progressed on a cisplatin plus either S-1 or capecitabine regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive disease after first-line cisplatin plus S-1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Keun-Wook, Kim, Bum Jun, Kim, Mi-Jung, Han, Hye Sook, Kim, Jin Won, Park, Young Iee, Park, Sook Ryun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764906
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.216
_version_ 1783250472642019328
author Lee, Keun-Wook
Kim, Bum Jun
Kim, Mi-Jung
Han, Hye Sook
Kim, Jin Won
Park, Young Iee
Park, Sook Ryun
author_facet Lee, Keun-Wook
Kim, Bum Jun
Kim, Mi-Jung
Han, Hye Sook
Kim, Jin Won
Park, Young Iee
Park, Sook Ryun
author_sort Lee, Keun-Wook
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluated the re-challenge of S-1 or cisplatin in combination with docetaxel in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) that had progressed on a cisplatin plus either S-1 or capecitabine regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive disease after first-line cisplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on D1 (D), docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) IV plus cisplatin 60 mg/m² IV on D1 (DC), or docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) IV D1 plus oral S-1 30 mg/m(2) twice a day on D1-14 (DS). RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were randomized to the D (n=23), DC (n=24), or DS (n=25) group. The confirmed response rate was 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 12.6%), 4.3% (95% CI, 0% to 12.6%), and 8.7% (95% CI, 0% to 20.2%) for the D, DC, and DS groups, respectively. Compared to the D arm, the DS arm had a better progression-free survival (2.7 months vs. 1.3 months, p=0.034) without any deterioration in safety or quality of life, whereas the DC arm had a similar progression-free survival (1.8 months vs. 1.3 months, p=0.804) and poorer overall survival (5.6 months vs. 10.0 months, p=0.035). CONCLUSION: A re-challenge with S-1, but not cisplatin, in combination with docetaxel has potential anticancer benefits over docetaxel alone in MGC with progression after prior cisplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5512362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55123622017-08-11 A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine Lee, Keun-Wook Kim, Bum Jun Kim, Mi-Jung Han, Hye Sook Kim, Jin Won Park, Young Iee Park, Sook Ryun Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated the re-challenge of S-1 or cisplatin in combination with docetaxel in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) that had progressed on a cisplatin plus either S-1 or capecitabine regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive disease after first-line cisplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on D1 (D), docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) IV plus cisplatin 60 mg/m² IV on D1 (DC), or docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) IV D1 plus oral S-1 30 mg/m(2) twice a day on D1-14 (DS). RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were randomized to the D (n=23), DC (n=24), or DS (n=25) group. The confirmed response rate was 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 12.6%), 4.3% (95% CI, 0% to 12.6%), and 8.7% (95% CI, 0% to 20.2%) for the D, DC, and DS groups, respectively. Compared to the D arm, the DS arm had a better progression-free survival (2.7 months vs. 1.3 months, p=0.034) without any deterioration in safety or quality of life, whereas the DC arm had a similar progression-free survival (1.8 months vs. 1.3 months, p=0.804) and poorer overall survival (5.6 months vs. 10.0 months, p=0.035). CONCLUSION: A re-challenge with S-1, but not cisplatin, in combination with docetaxel has potential anticancer benefits over docetaxel alone in MGC with progression after prior cisplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine. Korean Cancer Association 2017-07 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5512362/ /pubmed/27764906 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.216 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Keun-Wook
Kim, Bum Jun
Kim, Mi-Jung
Han, Hye Sook
Kim, Jin Won
Park, Young Iee
Park, Sook Ryun
A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine
title A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine
title_full A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine
title_fullStr A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine
title_full_unstemmed A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine
title_short A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine
title_sort multicenter randomized phase ii study of docetaxel vs. docetaxel plus cisplatin vs. docetaxel plus s-1 as second-line chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer patients who had progressed after cisplatin plus either s-1 or capecitabine
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764906
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.216
work_keys_str_mv AT leekeunwook amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT kimbumjun amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT kimmijung amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT hanhyesook amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT kimjinwon amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT parkyoungiee amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT parksookryun amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT leekeunwook multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT kimbumjun multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT kimmijung multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT hanhyesook multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT kimjinwon multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT parkyoungiee multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine
AT parksookryun multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine