Cargando…
A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the re-challenge of S-1 or cisplatin in combination with docetaxel in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) that had progressed on a cisplatin plus either S-1 or capecitabine regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive disease after first-line cisplatin plus S-1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Cancer Association
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764906 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.216 |
_version_ | 1783250472642019328 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Keun-Wook Kim, Bum Jun Kim, Mi-Jung Han, Hye Sook Kim, Jin Won Park, Young Iee Park, Sook Ryun |
author_facet | Lee, Keun-Wook Kim, Bum Jun Kim, Mi-Jung Han, Hye Sook Kim, Jin Won Park, Young Iee Park, Sook Ryun |
author_sort | Lee, Keun-Wook |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study evaluated the re-challenge of S-1 or cisplatin in combination with docetaxel in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) that had progressed on a cisplatin plus either S-1 or capecitabine regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive disease after first-line cisplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on D1 (D), docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) IV plus cisplatin 60 mg/m² IV on D1 (DC), or docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) IV D1 plus oral S-1 30 mg/m(2) twice a day on D1-14 (DS). RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were randomized to the D (n=23), DC (n=24), or DS (n=25) group. The confirmed response rate was 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 12.6%), 4.3% (95% CI, 0% to 12.6%), and 8.7% (95% CI, 0% to 20.2%) for the D, DC, and DS groups, respectively. Compared to the D arm, the DS arm had a better progression-free survival (2.7 months vs. 1.3 months, p=0.034) without any deterioration in safety or quality of life, whereas the DC arm had a similar progression-free survival (1.8 months vs. 1.3 months, p=0.804) and poorer overall survival (5.6 months vs. 10.0 months, p=0.035). CONCLUSION: A re-challenge with S-1, but not cisplatin, in combination with docetaxel has potential anticancer benefits over docetaxel alone in MGC with progression after prior cisplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5512362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Cancer Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55123622017-08-11 A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine Lee, Keun-Wook Kim, Bum Jun Kim, Mi-Jung Han, Hye Sook Kim, Jin Won Park, Young Iee Park, Sook Ryun Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated the re-challenge of S-1 or cisplatin in combination with docetaxel in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) that had progressed on a cisplatin plus either S-1 or capecitabine regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive disease after first-line cisplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on D1 (D), docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) IV plus cisplatin 60 mg/m² IV on D1 (DC), or docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) IV D1 plus oral S-1 30 mg/m(2) twice a day on D1-14 (DS). RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were randomized to the D (n=23), DC (n=24), or DS (n=25) group. The confirmed response rate was 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 12.6%), 4.3% (95% CI, 0% to 12.6%), and 8.7% (95% CI, 0% to 20.2%) for the D, DC, and DS groups, respectively. Compared to the D arm, the DS arm had a better progression-free survival (2.7 months vs. 1.3 months, p=0.034) without any deterioration in safety or quality of life, whereas the DC arm had a similar progression-free survival (1.8 months vs. 1.3 months, p=0.804) and poorer overall survival (5.6 months vs. 10.0 months, p=0.035). CONCLUSION: A re-challenge with S-1, but not cisplatin, in combination with docetaxel has potential anticancer benefits over docetaxel alone in MGC with progression after prior cisplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine. Korean Cancer Association 2017-07 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5512362/ /pubmed/27764906 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.216 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Keun-Wook Kim, Bum Jun Kim, Mi-Jung Han, Hye Sook Kim, Jin Won Park, Young Iee Park, Sook Ryun A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine |
title | A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine |
title_full | A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine |
title_fullStr | A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine |
title_short | A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel Plus S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Who Had Progressed after Cisplatin Plus Either S-1 or Capecitabine |
title_sort | multicenter randomized phase ii study of docetaxel vs. docetaxel plus cisplatin vs. docetaxel plus s-1 as second-line chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer patients who had progressed after cisplatin plus either s-1 or capecitabine |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764906 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekeunwook amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT kimbumjun amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT kimmijung amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT hanhyesook amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT kimjinwon amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT parkyoungiee amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT parksookryun amulticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT leekeunwook multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT kimbumjun multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT kimmijung multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT hanhyesook multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT kimjinwon multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT parkyoungiee multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine AT parksookryun multicenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofdocetaxelvsdocetaxelpluscisplatinvsdocetaxelpluss1assecondlinechemotherapyinmetastaticgastriccancerpatientswhohadprogressedaftercisplatinpluseithers1orcapecitabine |