Cargando…

An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, In Hae, Sohn, Joo Hyuk, Kim, Sung Bae, Lee, Keun Seok, Chung, Joo Seop, Lee, Soo Hyeon, Kim, Tae You, Jung, Kyung Hae, Cho, Eun Kyung, Kim, Yang Soo, Song, Hong Suk, Seo, Jae Hong, Ryoo, Hun Mo, Lee, Sun Ah, Yoon, So Young, Kim, Chul Soo, Kim, Yong Tai, Kim, Si Young, Jin, Mi Ryung, Ro, Jungsil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618821
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289
_version_ 1783250473584689152
author Park, In Hae
Sohn, Joo Hyuk
Kim, Sung Bae
Lee, Keun Seok
Chung, Joo Seop
Lee, Soo Hyeon
Kim, Tae You
Jung, Kyung Hae
Cho, Eun Kyung
Kim, Yang Soo
Song, Hong Suk
Seo, Jae Hong
Ryoo, Hun Mo
Lee, Sun Ah
Yoon, So Young
Kim, Chul Soo
Kim, Yong Tai
Kim, Si Young
Jin, Mi Ryung
Ro, Jungsil
author_facet Park, In Hae
Sohn, Joo Hyuk
Kim, Sung Bae
Lee, Keun Seok
Chung, Joo Seop
Lee, Soo Hyeon
Kim, Tae You
Jung, Kyung Hae
Cho, Eun Kyung
Kim, Yang Soo
Song, Hong Suk
Seo, Jae Hong
Ryoo, Hun Mo
Lee, Sun Ah
Yoon, So Young
Kim, Chul Soo
Kim, Yong Tai
Kim, Si Young
Jin, Mi Ryung
Ro, Jungsil
author_sort Park, In Hae
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m(2) or Genexol 175 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m(2) (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m(2) (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (p(non-inferiority)=0.021, p(superiority)=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5512366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55123662017-08-11 An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Park, In Hae Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Sung Bae Lee, Keun Seok Chung, Joo Seop Lee, Soo Hyeon Kim, Tae You Jung, Kyung Hae Cho, Eun Kyung Kim, Yang Soo Song, Hong Suk Seo, Jae Hong Ryoo, Hun Mo Lee, Sun Ah Yoon, So Young Kim, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Si Young Jin, Mi Ryung Ro, Jungsil Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m(2) or Genexol 175 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m(2) (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m(2) (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (p(non-inferiority)=0.021, p(superiority)=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Korean Cancer Association 2017-07 2016-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5512366/ /pubmed/27618821 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, In Hae
Sohn, Joo Hyuk
Kim, Sung Bae
Lee, Keun Seok
Chung, Joo Seop
Lee, Soo Hyeon
Kim, Tae You
Jung, Kyung Hae
Cho, Eun Kyung
Kim, Yang Soo
Song, Hong Suk
Seo, Jae Hong
Ryoo, Hun Mo
Lee, Sun Ah
Yoon, So Young
Kim, Chul Soo
Kim, Yong Tai
Kim, Si Young
Jin, Mi Ryung
Ro, Jungsil
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
title An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
title_full An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
title_fullStr An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
title_short An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
title_sort open-label, randomized, parallel, phase iii trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of polymeric micelle-formulated paclitaxel compared to conventional cremophor el-based paclitaxel for recurrent or metastatic her2-negative breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618821
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289
work_keys_str_mv AT parkinhae anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT sohnjoohyuk anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimsungbae anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT leekeunseok anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT chungjooseop anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT leesoohyeon anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimtaeyou anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT jungkyunghae anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT choeunkyung anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimyangsoo anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT songhongsuk anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT seojaehong anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT ryoohunmo anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT leesunah anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT yoonsoyoung anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimchulsoo anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimyongtai anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimsiyoung anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT jinmiryung anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT rojungsil anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT parkinhae openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT sohnjoohyuk openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimsungbae openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT leekeunseok openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT chungjooseop openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT leesoohyeon openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimtaeyou openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT jungkyunghae openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT choeunkyung openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimyangsoo openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT songhongsuk openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT seojaehong openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT ryoohunmo openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT leesunah openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT yoonsoyoung openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimchulsoo openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimyongtai openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT kimsiyoung openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT jinmiryung openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer
AT rojungsil openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer