Cargando…
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
PURPOSE: Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Cancer Association
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618821 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289 |
_version_ | 1783250473584689152 |
---|---|
author | Park, In Hae Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Sung Bae Lee, Keun Seok Chung, Joo Seop Lee, Soo Hyeon Kim, Tae You Jung, Kyung Hae Cho, Eun Kyung Kim, Yang Soo Song, Hong Suk Seo, Jae Hong Ryoo, Hun Mo Lee, Sun Ah Yoon, So Young Kim, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Si Young Jin, Mi Ryung Ro, Jungsil |
author_facet | Park, In Hae Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Sung Bae Lee, Keun Seok Chung, Joo Seop Lee, Soo Hyeon Kim, Tae You Jung, Kyung Hae Cho, Eun Kyung Kim, Yang Soo Song, Hong Suk Seo, Jae Hong Ryoo, Hun Mo Lee, Sun Ah Yoon, So Young Kim, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Si Young Jin, Mi Ryung Ro, Jungsil |
author_sort | Park, In Hae |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m(2) or Genexol 175 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m(2) (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m(2) (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (p(non-inferiority)=0.021, p(superiority)=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5512366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Cancer Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55123662017-08-11 An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Park, In Hae Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Sung Bae Lee, Keun Seok Chung, Joo Seop Lee, Soo Hyeon Kim, Tae You Jung, Kyung Hae Cho, Eun Kyung Kim, Yang Soo Song, Hong Suk Seo, Jae Hong Ryoo, Hun Mo Lee, Sun Ah Yoon, So Young Kim, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Si Young Jin, Mi Ryung Ro, Jungsil Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m(2) or Genexol 175 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m(2) (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m(2) (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (p(non-inferiority)=0.021, p(superiority)=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Korean Cancer Association 2017-07 2016-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5512366/ /pubmed/27618821 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, In Hae Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Sung Bae Lee, Keun Seok Chung, Joo Seop Lee, Soo Hyeon Kim, Tae You Jung, Kyung Hae Cho, Eun Kyung Kim, Yang Soo Song, Hong Suk Seo, Jae Hong Ryoo, Hun Mo Lee, Sun Ah Yoon, So Young Kim, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Si Young Jin, Mi Ryung Ro, Jungsil An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer |
title | An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_full | An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_short | An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_sort | open-label, randomized, parallel, phase iii trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of polymeric micelle-formulated paclitaxel compared to conventional cremophor el-based paclitaxel for recurrent or metastatic her2-negative breast cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618821 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkinhae anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT sohnjoohyuk anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimsungbae anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT leekeunseok anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT chungjooseop anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT leesoohyeon anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimtaeyou anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT jungkyunghae anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT choeunkyung anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimyangsoo anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT songhongsuk anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT seojaehong anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT ryoohunmo anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT leesunah anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT yoonsoyoung anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimchulsoo anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimyongtai anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimsiyoung anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT jinmiryung anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT rojungsil anopenlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT parkinhae openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT sohnjoohyuk openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimsungbae openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT leekeunseok openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT chungjooseop openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT leesoohyeon openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimtaeyou openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT jungkyunghae openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT choeunkyung openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimyangsoo openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT songhongsuk openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT seojaehong openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT ryoohunmo openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT leesunah openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT yoonsoyoung openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimchulsoo openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimyongtai openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT kimsiyoung openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT jinmiryung openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer AT rojungsil openlabelrandomizedparallelphaseiiitrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofpolymericmicelleformulatedpaclitaxelcomparedtoconventionalcremophorelbasedpaclitaxelforrecurrentormetastaticher2negativebreastcancer |