Cargando…
Enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development – a qualitative analysis
BACKGROUND: Professional competence is important in delivering high quality patient care, and it can be enhanced by reflection and reflective discourse e.g. in mentoring groups. However, students are often reluctant though to engage in this discourse. A group mentoring program involving all preclini...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28709462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0951-y |
_version_ | 1783250538615275520 |
---|---|
author | Lutz, Gabriele Pankoke, Nina Goldblatt, Hadass Hofmann, Marzellus Zupanic, Michaela |
author_facet | Lutz, Gabriele Pankoke, Nina Goldblatt, Hadass Hofmann, Marzellus Zupanic, Michaela |
author_sort | Lutz, Gabriele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Professional competence is important in delivering high quality patient care, and it can be enhanced by reflection and reflective discourse e.g. in mentoring groups. However, students are often reluctant though to engage in this discourse. A group mentoring program involving all preclinical students as well as faculty members and co-mentoring clinical students was initiated at Witten-Herdecke University. This study explores both the attitudes of those students towards such a program and factors that might hinder or enhance how students engage in reflective discourse. METHODS: A qualitative design was applied using semi-structured focus group interviews with preclinical students and semi-structured individual interviews with mentors and co-mentors. The interview data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Students’ attitudes towards reflective discourse on professional challenges were diverse. Some students valued the new program and named positive outcomes regarding several features of professional development. Enriching experiences were described. Others expressed aversive attitudes. Three reasons for these were given: unclear goals and benefits, interpersonal problems within the groups hindering development and intrapersonal issues such as insecurity and traditional views of medical education. Participants mentioned several program setup factors that could enhance how students engage in such groups: explaining the program thoroughly, setting expectations and integrating the reflective discourse in a meaningful way into the curriculum, obliging participation without coercion, developing a sense of security, trust and interest in each other within the groups, randomizing group composition and facilitating group moderators as positive peer and faculty role models and as learning group members. CONCLUSIONS: A well-designed and empathetic setup of group mentoring programs can help raise openness towards engaging in meaningful reflective discourse. Reflection on and communication of professional challenges can, in turn, improve professional development, which is essential for high quality patient care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0951-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5512833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55128332017-07-19 Enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development – a qualitative analysis Lutz, Gabriele Pankoke, Nina Goldblatt, Hadass Hofmann, Marzellus Zupanic, Michaela BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Professional competence is important in delivering high quality patient care, and it can be enhanced by reflection and reflective discourse e.g. in mentoring groups. However, students are often reluctant though to engage in this discourse. A group mentoring program involving all preclinical students as well as faculty members and co-mentoring clinical students was initiated at Witten-Herdecke University. This study explores both the attitudes of those students towards such a program and factors that might hinder or enhance how students engage in reflective discourse. METHODS: A qualitative design was applied using semi-structured focus group interviews with preclinical students and semi-structured individual interviews with mentors and co-mentors. The interview data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Students’ attitudes towards reflective discourse on professional challenges were diverse. Some students valued the new program and named positive outcomes regarding several features of professional development. Enriching experiences were described. Others expressed aversive attitudes. Three reasons for these were given: unclear goals and benefits, interpersonal problems within the groups hindering development and intrapersonal issues such as insecurity and traditional views of medical education. Participants mentioned several program setup factors that could enhance how students engage in such groups: explaining the program thoroughly, setting expectations and integrating the reflective discourse in a meaningful way into the curriculum, obliging participation without coercion, developing a sense of security, trust and interest in each other within the groups, randomizing group composition and facilitating group moderators as positive peer and faculty role models and as learning group members. CONCLUSIONS: A well-designed and empathetic setup of group mentoring programs can help raise openness towards engaging in meaningful reflective discourse. Reflection on and communication of professional challenges can, in turn, improve professional development, which is essential for high quality patient care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0951-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5512833/ /pubmed/28709462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0951-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lutz, Gabriele Pankoke, Nina Goldblatt, Hadass Hofmann, Marzellus Zupanic, Michaela Enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development – a qualitative analysis |
title | Enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development – a qualitative analysis |
title_full | Enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development – a qualitative analysis |
title_fullStr | Enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development – a qualitative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development – a qualitative analysis |
title_short | Enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development – a qualitative analysis |
title_sort | enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development – a qualitative analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28709462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0951-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lutzgabriele enhancingmedicalstudentsreflectivityinmentoringgroupsforprofessionaldevelopmentaqualitativeanalysis AT pankokenina enhancingmedicalstudentsreflectivityinmentoringgroupsforprofessionaldevelopmentaqualitativeanalysis AT goldblatthadass enhancingmedicalstudentsreflectivityinmentoringgroupsforprofessionaldevelopmentaqualitativeanalysis AT hofmannmarzellus enhancingmedicalstudentsreflectivityinmentoringgroupsforprofessionaldevelopmentaqualitativeanalysis AT zupanicmichaela enhancingmedicalstudentsreflectivityinmentoringgroupsforprofessionaldevelopmentaqualitativeanalysis |