Cargando…

Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues

The aim of this study was to determine whether dynamic accommodation responds to isolated blur cues without feedback, and without changes in the distance of the object. Nine healthy subjects aged 21–40 years were recruited. Four different aberration patterns were used as stimuli to induce blur with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esteve-Taboada, José J., Del Águila-Carrasco, Antonio J., Bernal-Molina, Paula, López-Gil, Norberto, Montés-Micó, Robert, Kruger, Philip, Marín-Franch, Iván
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28619515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.007
_version_ 1783250539797020672
author Esteve-Taboada, José J.
Del Águila-Carrasco, Antonio J.
Bernal-Molina, Paula
López-Gil, Norberto
Montés-Micó, Robert
Kruger, Philip
Marín-Franch, Iván
author_facet Esteve-Taboada, José J.
Del Águila-Carrasco, Antonio J.
Bernal-Molina, Paula
López-Gil, Norberto
Montés-Micó, Robert
Kruger, Philip
Marín-Franch, Iván
author_sort Esteve-Taboada, José J.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to determine whether dynamic accommodation responds to isolated blur cues without feedback, and without changes in the distance of the object. Nine healthy subjects aged 21–40 years were recruited. Four different aberration patterns were used as stimuli to induce blur with (1) the eye's natural, uncorrected, optical aberrations, (2) all aberrations corrected, (3) spherical aberration only, or (4) astigmatism only. The stimulus was a video animation based on computer-generated images of a monochromatic Maltese cross. Each individual video was generated for each subject off-line, after measuring individual aberrations at different accommodation levels. The video simulated sinusoidal changes in defocus at 0.2 Hz. Dynamic images were observed through a 0.8 mm pinhole placed at a plane conjugated with the eye’s pupil, thus effectively removing potential feedback stemming from accommodation changes. Accommodation responses were measured with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer for the four different aberration patterns. The results showed that seven out of nine subjects did not respond to any stimuli, whereas the response of the other two subjects was erratic and they seemed to be searching rather than following the stimulus. A significant reduction in average accommodative gain (from 0.52 to 0.11) was obtained when the dioptric demand cue was removed. No statistically significant differences were found among the experimental conditions used. We conclude that aberration related blur does not drive the accommodation response in the absence of feedback from accommodation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5512838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier Science Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55128382017-07-21 Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues Esteve-Taboada, José J. Del Águila-Carrasco, Antonio J. Bernal-Molina, Paula López-Gil, Norberto Montés-Micó, Robert Kruger, Philip Marín-Franch, Iván Vision Res Article The aim of this study was to determine whether dynamic accommodation responds to isolated blur cues without feedback, and without changes in the distance of the object. Nine healthy subjects aged 21–40 years were recruited. Four different aberration patterns were used as stimuli to induce blur with (1) the eye's natural, uncorrected, optical aberrations, (2) all aberrations corrected, (3) spherical aberration only, or (4) astigmatism only. The stimulus was a video animation based on computer-generated images of a monochromatic Maltese cross. Each individual video was generated for each subject off-line, after measuring individual aberrations at different accommodation levels. The video simulated sinusoidal changes in defocus at 0.2 Hz. Dynamic images were observed through a 0.8 mm pinhole placed at a plane conjugated with the eye’s pupil, thus effectively removing potential feedback stemming from accommodation changes. Accommodation responses were measured with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer for the four different aberration patterns. The results showed that seven out of nine subjects did not respond to any stimuli, whereas the response of the other two subjects was erratic and they seemed to be searching rather than following the stimulus. A significant reduction in average accommodative gain (from 0.52 to 0.11) was obtained when the dioptric demand cue was removed. No statistically significant differences were found among the experimental conditions used. We conclude that aberration related blur does not drive the accommodation response in the absence of feedback from accommodation. Elsevier Science Ltd 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5512838/ /pubmed/28619515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.007 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Esteve-Taboada, José J.
Del Águila-Carrasco, Antonio J.
Bernal-Molina, Paula
López-Gil, Norberto
Montés-Micó, Robert
Kruger, Philip
Marín-Franch, Iván
Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues
title Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues
title_full Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues
title_fullStr Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues
title_short Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues
title_sort dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28619515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.007
work_keys_str_mv AT estevetaboadajosej dynamicaccommodationwithoutfeedbackdoesnotrespondtoisolatedblurcues
AT delaguilacarrascoantonioj dynamicaccommodationwithoutfeedbackdoesnotrespondtoisolatedblurcues
AT bernalmolinapaula dynamicaccommodationwithoutfeedbackdoesnotrespondtoisolatedblurcues
AT lopezgilnorberto dynamicaccommodationwithoutfeedbackdoesnotrespondtoisolatedblurcues
AT montesmicorobert dynamicaccommodationwithoutfeedbackdoesnotrespondtoisolatedblurcues
AT krugerphilip dynamicaccommodationwithoutfeedbackdoesnotrespondtoisolatedblurcues
AT marinfranchivan dynamicaccommodationwithoutfeedbackdoesnotrespondtoisolatedblurcues