Cargando…
Advancing team-based primary health care: a comparative analysis of policies in western Canada
BACKGROUND: We analyzed and compared primary health care (PHC) policies in British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan to understand how they inform the design and implementation of team-based primary health care service delivery. The goal was to develop policy imperatives that can advance team-based...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2439-1 |
_version_ | 1783250568101232640 |
---|---|
author | Suter, Esther Mallinson, Sara Misfeldt, Renee Boakye, Omenaa Nasmith, Louise Wong, Sabrina T. |
author_facet | Suter, Esther Mallinson, Sara Misfeldt, Renee Boakye, Omenaa Nasmith, Louise Wong, Sabrina T. |
author_sort | Suter, Esther |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We analyzed and compared primary health care (PHC) policies in British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan to understand how they inform the design and implementation of team-based primary health care service delivery. The goal was to develop policy imperatives that can advance team-based PHC in Canada. METHODS: We conducted comparative case studies (n = 3). The policy analysis included: Context review: We reviewed relevant information (2007 to 2014) from databases and websites. Policy review and comparative analysis: We compared and contrasted publically available PHC policies. Key informant interviews: Key informants (n = 30) validated narratives prepared from the comparative analysis by offering contextual information on potential policy imperatives. Advisory group and roundtable: An expert advisory group guided this work and a key stakeholder roundtable event guided prioritization of policy imperatives. RESULTS: The concept of team-based PHC varies widely across and within the three provinces. We noted policy gaps related to team configuration, leadership, scope of practice, role clarity and financing of team-based care; few policies speak explicitly to monitoring and evaluation of team-based PHC. We prioritized four policy imperatives: (1) alignment of goals and policies at different system levels; (2) investment of resources for system change; (3) compensation models for all members of the team; and (4) accountability through collaborative practice metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Policies supporting team-based PHC have been slow to emerge, lacking a systematic and coordinated approach. Greater alignment with specific consideration of financing, reimbursement, implementation mechanisms and performance monitoring could accelerate systemic transformation by removing some well-known barriers to team-based care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2439-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5512982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55129822017-07-19 Advancing team-based primary health care: a comparative analysis of policies in western Canada Suter, Esther Mallinson, Sara Misfeldt, Renee Boakye, Omenaa Nasmith, Louise Wong, Sabrina T. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: We analyzed and compared primary health care (PHC) policies in British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan to understand how they inform the design and implementation of team-based primary health care service delivery. The goal was to develop policy imperatives that can advance team-based PHC in Canada. METHODS: We conducted comparative case studies (n = 3). The policy analysis included: Context review: We reviewed relevant information (2007 to 2014) from databases and websites. Policy review and comparative analysis: We compared and contrasted publically available PHC policies. Key informant interviews: Key informants (n = 30) validated narratives prepared from the comparative analysis by offering contextual information on potential policy imperatives. Advisory group and roundtable: An expert advisory group guided this work and a key stakeholder roundtable event guided prioritization of policy imperatives. RESULTS: The concept of team-based PHC varies widely across and within the three provinces. We noted policy gaps related to team configuration, leadership, scope of practice, role clarity and financing of team-based care; few policies speak explicitly to monitoring and evaluation of team-based PHC. We prioritized four policy imperatives: (1) alignment of goals and policies at different system levels; (2) investment of resources for system change; (3) compensation models for all members of the team; and (4) accountability through collaborative practice metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Policies supporting team-based PHC have been slow to emerge, lacking a systematic and coordinated approach. Greater alignment with specific consideration of financing, reimbursement, implementation mechanisms and performance monitoring could accelerate systemic transformation by removing some well-known barriers to team-based care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2439-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5512982/ /pubmed/28716120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2439-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Suter, Esther Mallinson, Sara Misfeldt, Renee Boakye, Omenaa Nasmith, Louise Wong, Sabrina T. Advancing team-based primary health care: a comparative analysis of policies in western Canada |
title | Advancing team-based primary health care: a comparative analysis of policies in western Canada |
title_full | Advancing team-based primary health care: a comparative analysis of policies in western Canada |
title_fullStr | Advancing team-based primary health care: a comparative analysis of policies in western Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Advancing team-based primary health care: a comparative analysis of policies in western Canada |
title_short | Advancing team-based primary health care: a comparative analysis of policies in western Canada |
title_sort | advancing team-based primary health care: a comparative analysis of policies in western canada |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2439-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suteresther advancingteambasedprimaryhealthcareacomparativeanalysisofpoliciesinwesterncanada AT mallinsonsara advancingteambasedprimaryhealthcareacomparativeanalysisofpoliciesinwesterncanada AT misfeldtrenee advancingteambasedprimaryhealthcareacomparativeanalysisofpoliciesinwesterncanada AT boakyeomenaa advancingteambasedprimaryhealthcareacomparativeanalysisofpoliciesinwesterncanada AT nasmithlouise advancingteambasedprimaryhealthcareacomparativeanalysisofpoliciesinwesterncanada AT wongsabrinat advancingteambasedprimaryhealthcareacomparativeanalysisofpoliciesinwesterncanada |