Cargando…

Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as positive for individuals, the health system, public health, as well as for communities and society as a whole. We investigated whether preferences for PPI differed between two countries with Beveridge type health systems–Sweden and Englan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fredriksson, Mio, Eriksson, Max, Tritter, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28709413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4534-y
_version_ 1783250569799925760
author Fredriksson, Mio
Eriksson, Max
Tritter, Jonathan
author_facet Fredriksson, Mio
Eriksson, Max
Tritter, Jonathan
author_sort Fredriksson, Mio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as positive for individuals, the health system, public health, as well as for communities and society as a whole. We investigated whether preferences for PPI differed between two countries with Beveridge type health systems–Sweden and England. We measured willingness to be involved in individual treatment decisions and in decisions about the organization and provision of local health and social care services. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study of the general population’s preferences. Together, the two samples included 3125 respondents; 1625 in England and 1500 in Sweden. Country differences were analysed in a multinomial regression model controlling for gender, age and educational attainment. RESULTS: Overall, 68% of respondents wanted a passive patient role and 44% wanted to be involved in local decisions about organization and provision of services. In comparison with in Sweden, they were in England less likely to want a health professional such as a GP or consultant to make decisions about their treatment and also more likely to want to make their own decisions. They were also less likely to want to be involved in local service development decisions. An increased likelihood of wanting to be involved in organizational decision-making was associated with individuals wanting to make their own treatment decisions. Women were less likely to want health professionals to make decisions and more likely to want to be involved in organizational decisions. CONCLUSIONS: An effective health system that ensures public health must integrate an effective approach to PPI both in individual treatment decisions and shaping local health and social care priorities. To be effective, involvement activities must take in to account the variation in the desire for involvement and the implications that this has for equity. More work is needed to understand the relationship between the desire to be involved and actually being involved, but both appear related to judgements of the impact of involvement on health care decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5512988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55129882017-07-19 Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden Fredriksson, Mio Eriksson, Max Tritter, Jonathan BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as positive for individuals, the health system, public health, as well as for communities and society as a whole. We investigated whether preferences for PPI differed between two countries with Beveridge type health systems–Sweden and England. We measured willingness to be involved in individual treatment decisions and in decisions about the organization and provision of local health and social care services. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study of the general population’s preferences. Together, the two samples included 3125 respondents; 1625 in England and 1500 in Sweden. Country differences were analysed in a multinomial regression model controlling for gender, age and educational attainment. RESULTS: Overall, 68% of respondents wanted a passive patient role and 44% wanted to be involved in local decisions about organization and provision of services. In comparison with in Sweden, they were in England less likely to want a health professional such as a GP or consultant to make decisions about their treatment and also more likely to want to make their own decisions. They were also less likely to want to be involved in local service development decisions. An increased likelihood of wanting to be involved in organizational decision-making was associated with individuals wanting to make their own treatment decisions. Women were less likely to want health professionals to make decisions and more likely to want to be involved in organizational decisions. CONCLUSIONS: An effective health system that ensures public health must integrate an effective approach to PPI both in individual treatment decisions and shaping local health and social care priorities. To be effective, involvement activities must take in to account the variation in the desire for involvement and the implications that this has for equity. More work is needed to understand the relationship between the desire to be involved and actually being involved, but both appear related to judgements of the impact of involvement on health care decisions. BioMed Central 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5512988/ /pubmed/28709413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4534-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fredriksson, Mio
Eriksson, Max
Tritter, Jonathan
Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden
title Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden
title_full Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden
title_fullStr Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden
title_short Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden
title_sort who wants to be involved in health care decisions? comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in england and sweden
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28709413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4534-y
work_keys_str_mv AT fredrikssonmio whowantstobeinvolvedinhealthcaredecisionscomparingpreferencesforindividualandcollectiveinvolvementinenglandandsweden
AT erikssonmax whowantstobeinvolvedinhealthcaredecisionscomparingpreferencesforindividualandcollectiveinvolvementinenglandandsweden
AT tritterjonathan whowantstobeinvolvedinhealthcaredecisionscomparingpreferencesforindividualandcollectiveinvolvementinenglandandsweden