Cargando…
Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden
BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as positive for individuals, the health system, public health, as well as for communities and society as a whole. We investigated whether preferences for PPI differed between two countries with Beveridge type health systems–Sweden and Englan...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28709413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4534-y |
_version_ | 1783250569799925760 |
---|---|
author | Fredriksson, Mio Eriksson, Max Tritter, Jonathan |
author_facet | Fredriksson, Mio Eriksson, Max Tritter, Jonathan |
author_sort | Fredriksson, Mio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as positive for individuals, the health system, public health, as well as for communities and society as a whole. We investigated whether preferences for PPI differed between two countries with Beveridge type health systems–Sweden and England. We measured willingness to be involved in individual treatment decisions and in decisions about the organization and provision of local health and social care services. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study of the general population’s preferences. Together, the two samples included 3125 respondents; 1625 in England and 1500 in Sweden. Country differences were analysed in a multinomial regression model controlling for gender, age and educational attainment. RESULTS: Overall, 68% of respondents wanted a passive patient role and 44% wanted to be involved in local decisions about organization and provision of services. In comparison with in Sweden, they were in England less likely to want a health professional such as a GP or consultant to make decisions about their treatment and also more likely to want to make their own decisions. They were also less likely to want to be involved in local service development decisions. An increased likelihood of wanting to be involved in organizational decision-making was associated with individuals wanting to make their own treatment decisions. Women were less likely to want health professionals to make decisions and more likely to want to be involved in organizational decisions. CONCLUSIONS: An effective health system that ensures public health must integrate an effective approach to PPI both in individual treatment decisions and shaping local health and social care priorities. To be effective, involvement activities must take in to account the variation in the desire for involvement and the implications that this has for equity. More work is needed to understand the relationship between the desire to be involved and actually being involved, but both appear related to judgements of the impact of involvement on health care decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5512988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55129882017-07-19 Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden Fredriksson, Mio Eriksson, Max Tritter, Jonathan BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as positive for individuals, the health system, public health, as well as for communities and society as a whole. We investigated whether preferences for PPI differed between two countries with Beveridge type health systems–Sweden and England. We measured willingness to be involved in individual treatment decisions and in decisions about the organization and provision of local health and social care services. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study of the general population’s preferences. Together, the two samples included 3125 respondents; 1625 in England and 1500 in Sweden. Country differences were analysed in a multinomial regression model controlling for gender, age and educational attainment. RESULTS: Overall, 68% of respondents wanted a passive patient role and 44% wanted to be involved in local decisions about organization and provision of services. In comparison with in Sweden, they were in England less likely to want a health professional such as a GP or consultant to make decisions about their treatment and also more likely to want to make their own decisions. They were also less likely to want to be involved in local service development decisions. An increased likelihood of wanting to be involved in organizational decision-making was associated with individuals wanting to make their own treatment decisions. Women were less likely to want health professionals to make decisions and more likely to want to be involved in organizational decisions. CONCLUSIONS: An effective health system that ensures public health must integrate an effective approach to PPI both in individual treatment decisions and shaping local health and social care priorities. To be effective, involvement activities must take in to account the variation in the desire for involvement and the implications that this has for equity. More work is needed to understand the relationship between the desire to be involved and actually being involved, but both appear related to judgements of the impact of involvement on health care decisions. BioMed Central 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5512988/ /pubmed/28709413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4534-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fredriksson, Mio Eriksson, Max Tritter, Jonathan Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden |
title | Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden |
title_full | Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden |
title_fullStr | Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden |
title_full_unstemmed | Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden |
title_short | Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden |
title_sort | who wants to be involved in health care decisions? comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in england and sweden |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28709413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4534-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fredrikssonmio whowantstobeinvolvedinhealthcaredecisionscomparingpreferencesforindividualandcollectiveinvolvementinenglandandsweden AT erikssonmax whowantstobeinvolvedinhealthcaredecisionscomparingpreferencesforindividualandcollectiveinvolvementinenglandandsweden AT tritterjonathan whowantstobeinvolvedinhealthcaredecisionscomparingpreferencesforindividualandcollectiveinvolvementinenglandandsweden |