Cargando…

Understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt) has the potential to reduce cancer‐related mortality. Symptom vigilance remains crucial as a proportion of cancers will be diagnosed between screening rounds. A negative FOBt has the potential to influence how part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnett, Karen N., Weller, David, Smith, Steve, Orbell, Sheina, Vedsted, Peter, Steele, Robert J. C., Melia, Jane W., Moss, Sue M., Patnick, Julietta, Campbell, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27414462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12484
_version_ 1783250571272126464
author Barnett, Karen N.
Weller, David
Smith, Steve
Orbell, Sheina
Vedsted, Peter
Steele, Robert J. C.
Melia, Jane W.
Moss, Sue M.
Patnick, Julietta
Campbell, Christine
author_facet Barnett, Karen N.
Weller, David
Smith, Steve
Orbell, Sheina
Vedsted, Peter
Steele, Robert J. C.
Melia, Jane W.
Moss, Sue M.
Patnick, Julietta
Campbell, Christine
author_sort Barnett, Karen N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt) has the potential to reduce cancer‐related mortality. Symptom vigilance remains crucial as a proportion of cancers will be diagnosed between screening rounds. A negative FOBt has the potential to influence how participants respond to future symptoms of CRC. OBJECTIVE: To explore (i) understanding of a negative FOBt and (ii) the potential impact of a negative FOBt upon future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour. DESIGN: Qualitative methodology utilizing focus groups with participants who received a negative FOBt within the National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in Coventry and Lothian. Topics explored included: experience of screening participation, interpretation and understanding of a negative result, symptom awareness and attitudes towards help‐seeking. RESULTS: Four broad themes were identified: (i) emotional response to a negative FOBt, (ii) understanding the limitations of FOBt screening, (iii) symptom knowledge and interpretation and (iv) over‐reassurance from a negative FOBt. Participants were reassured by a negative FOBt, but there was variability in the extent to which the result was interpreted as an “all clear”. Some participants acknowledged the residual risk of cancer and the temporal characteristic of the result, while others were surprised that the result was not a guarantee that they did not have cancer. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Participants recognized that reassurance from a negative FOBt could lead to a short‐term delay in help‐seeking if symptoms developed. Screening programmes should seek to emphasize the importance of the temporal nature of FOBt results with key messages about symptom recognition and prompt help‐seeking behaviour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5512994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55129942017-08-01 Understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study Barnett, Karen N. Weller, David Smith, Steve Orbell, Sheina Vedsted, Peter Steele, Robert J. C. Melia, Jane W. Moss, Sue M. Patnick, Julietta Campbell, Christine Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt) has the potential to reduce cancer‐related mortality. Symptom vigilance remains crucial as a proportion of cancers will be diagnosed between screening rounds. A negative FOBt has the potential to influence how participants respond to future symptoms of CRC. OBJECTIVE: To explore (i) understanding of a negative FOBt and (ii) the potential impact of a negative FOBt upon future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour. DESIGN: Qualitative methodology utilizing focus groups with participants who received a negative FOBt within the National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in Coventry and Lothian. Topics explored included: experience of screening participation, interpretation and understanding of a negative result, symptom awareness and attitudes towards help‐seeking. RESULTS: Four broad themes were identified: (i) emotional response to a negative FOBt, (ii) understanding the limitations of FOBt screening, (iii) symptom knowledge and interpretation and (iv) over‐reassurance from a negative FOBt. Participants were reassured by a negative FOBt, but there was variability in the extent to which the result was interpreted as an “all clear”. Some participants acknowledged the residual risk of cancer and the temporal characteristic of the result, while others were surprised that the result was not a guarantee that they did not have cancer. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Participants recognized that reassurance from a negative FOBt could lead to a short‐term delay in help‐seeking if symptoms developed. Screening programmes should seek to emphasize the importance of the temporal nature of FOBt results with key messages about symptom recognition and prompt help‐seeking behaviour. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-14 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5512994/ /pubmed/27414462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12484 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Barnett, Karen N.
Weller, David
Smith, Steve
Orbell, Sheina
Vedsted, Peter
Steele, Robert J. C.
Melia, Jane W.
Moss, Sue M.
Patnick, Julietta
Campbell, Christine
Understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study
title Understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study
title_full Understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study
title_fullStr Understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study
title_short Understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study
title_sort understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27414462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12484
work_keys_str_mv AT barnettkarenn understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy
AT wellerdavid understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy
AT smithsteve understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy
AT orbellsheina understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy
AT vedstedpeter understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy
AT steelerobertjc understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy
AT meliajanew understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy
AT mosssuem understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy
AT patnickjulietta understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy
AT campbellchristine understandingofanegativebowelscreeningresultandpotentialimpactonfuturesymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviourafocusgroupstudy