Cargando…

A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—A web‐based randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Patients making treatment decisions require understandable evidence‐based information. However, evidence on graphical presentation of benefits and side‐effects of medical treatments is not conclusive. The study evaluated a new space‐saving format, CLARIFIG (clarifying risk figures), aimin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasper, Jürgen, van de Roemer, Adrian, Pöttgen, Jana, Rahn, Anne, Backhus, Imke, Bay, Yasemin, Köpke, Sascha, Heesen, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27981688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12522
_version_ 1783250576623009792
author Kasper, Jürgen
van de Roemer, Adrian
Pöttgen, Jana
Rahn, Anne
Backhus, Imke
Bay, Yasemin
Köpke, Sascha
Heesen, Christoph
author_facet Kasper, Jürgen
van de Roemer, Adrian
Pöttgen, Jana
Rahn, Anne
Backhus, Imke
Bay, Yasemin
Köpke, Sascha
Heesen, Christoph
author_sort Kasper, Jürgen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patients making treatment decisions require understandable evidence‐based information. However, evidence on graphical presentation of benefits and side‐effects of medical treatments is not conclusive. The study evaluated a new space‐saving format, CLARIFIG (clarifying risk figures), aiming to facilitate accuracy of comprehension. METHODS: CLARIFIG displays groups of patients with and without treatment benefits as coloured sectors of a proportional bar graph representing in total 100 patients. Supplementary icons indicate the corresponding group's actual condition. The study used an application showing effects of immunotherapy intended to slow disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). In a four‐arm web‐based randomized controlled trial, CLARIFIG was compared to the reference standard, multifigure pictographs (MFP), regarding comprehension (primary outcome) and processing time. Both formats were presented as static and animated versions. People with MS were recruited through the website of the German MS society. RESULTS: Six hundred and eighty‐two patients were randomized and analysed for the primary end point. There were no differences in comprehension rates (MFP (static)=46%, CLARIFIG (static)=44%; P=.59; MFP (animated)=23%, CLARIFIG (animated)=30%; P=.134). Processing time for CLARIFIG was shorter only in the animated version (MFP (static)=162 seconds, CLARIFIG (static)=155 seconds; P=.653; MFP (animated)=286 seconds, CLARIFIG (animated)=189 seconds; P≤.001). However, both animated versions caused more wrong answers and longer processing time than static presentation (MFP (static) vs (animated): P≤.001/.001, CLARIFIG (static) vs (animated): P=.027/.017). CONCLUSION: Comprehension of the new format is comparable to MFP. CLARIFIG has the potential to simplify presentation in more complex contexts such as comparison of several treatment options in patient decision aids, but further studies are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5513016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55130162017-08-01 A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—A web‐based randomized controlled trial Kasper, Jürgen van de Roemer, Adrian Pöttgen, Jana Rahn, Anne Backhus, Imke Bay, Yasemin Köpke, Sascha Heesen, Christoph Health Expect Original Research Papers OBJECTIVE: Patients making treatment decisions require understandable evidence‐based information. However, evidence on graphical presentation of benefits and side‐effects of medical treatments is not conclusive. The study evaluated a new space‐saving format, CLARIFIG (clarifying risk figures), aiming to facilitate accuracy of comprehension. METHODS: CLARIFIG displays groups of patients with and without treatment benefits as coloured sectors of a proportional bar graph representing in total 100 patients. Supplementary icons indicate the corresponding group's actual condition. The study used an application showing effects of immunotherapy intended to slow disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). In a four‐arm web‐based randomized controlled trial, CLARIFIG was compared to the reference standard, multifigure pictographs (MFP), regarding comprehension (primary outcome) and processing time. Both formats were presented as static and animated versions. People with MS were recruited through the website of the German MS society. RESULTS: Six hundred and eighty‐two patients were randomized and analysed for the primary end point. There were no differences in comprehension rates (MFP (static)=46%, CLARIFIG (static)=44%; P=.59; MFP (animated)=23%, CLARIFIG (animated)=30%; P=.134). Processing time for CLARIFIG was shorter only in the animated version (MFP (static)=162 seconds, CLARIFIG (static)=155 seconds; P=.653; MFP (animated)=286 seconds, CLARIFIG (animated)=189 seconds; P≤.001). However, both animated versions caused more wrong answers and longer processing time than static presentation (MFP (static) vs (animated): P≤.001/.001, CLARIFIG (static) vs (animated): P=.027/.017). CONCLUSION: Comprehension of the new format is comparable to MFP. CLARIFIG has the potential to simplify presentation in more complex contexts such as comparison of several treatment options in patient decision aids, but further studies are needed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-16 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5513016/ /pubmed/27981688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12522 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Health Expectations Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Kasper, Jürgen
van de Roemer, Adrian
Pöttgen, Jana
Rahn, Anne
Backhus, Imke
Bay, Yasemin
Köpke, Sascha
Heesen, Christoph
A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—A web‐based randomized controlled trial
title A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—A web‐based randomized controlled trial
title_full A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—A web‐based randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—A web‐based randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—A web‐based randomized controlled trial
title_short A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—A web‐based randomized controlled trial
title_sort new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—a web‐based randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27981688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12522
work_keys_str_mv AT kasperjurgen anewgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderoemeradrian anewgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pottgenjana anewgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rahnanne anewgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT backhusimke anewgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bayyasemin anewgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kopkesascha anewgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heesenchristoph anewgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kasperjurgen newgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderoemeradrian newgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pottgenjana newgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rahnanne newgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT backhusimke newgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bayyasemin newgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kopkesascha newgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heesenchristoph newgraphicalformattocommunicatetreatmenteffectstopatientsawebbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial