Cargando…

The use of non-uniform drowning terminology: a follow-up study

BACKGROUND: In 2002, the World Congress on Drowning developed a uniform definition for drowning. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of “non-uniform drowning terminology” (NUDT) and “non-uniform drowning definitions” (NUDD) in peer-reviewed scientific literature from 2010 to 2016, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt, Andrew C., Sempsrott, Justin R., Szpilman, David, Queiroga, Ana Catarina, Davison, Matt S., Zeigler, Ryan J., McAlister, Sean J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0405-x
_version_ 1783250577341284352
author Schmidt, Andrew C.
Sempsrott, Justin R.
Szpilman, David
Queiroga, Ana Catarina
Davison, Matt S.
Zeigler, Ryan J.
McAlister, Sean J.
author_facet Schmidt, Andrew C.
Sempsrott, Justin R.
Szpilman, David
Queiroga, Ana Catarina
Davison, Matt S.
Zeigler, Ryan J.
McAlister, Sean J.
author_sort Schmidt, Andrew C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2002, the World Congress on Drowning developed a uniform definition for drowning. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of “non-uniform drowning terminology” (NUDT) and “non-uniform drowning definitions” (NUDD) in peer-reviewed scientific literature from 2010 to 2016, and compare these findings with those from our unpublished study performing a similar analysis on literature from 2003 to 2010. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using drowning-specific search terms in Pubmed and Web of Science. Titles and abstracts published between July 2010 and January 2016 were screened for relevance to the study focus. Articles meeting screening criteria were reviewed for exclusion criteria to produce the final group of studies. These articles were reviewed by four reviewers for NUDT and NUDD. The Fisher exact test was used to determine any statistically significant changes. RESULTS: The final group of studies included 167 articles. A total of 53 articles (32%) utilized NUDT, with 100% of these including the term “near drowning”. The proportion of articles utilizing NUDT was significantly less than reported by our previous study (p < 0.05). In addition, 32% of the articles included a definition for drowning (uniform or non-uniform), with 15% of these utilizing NUDD. DISCUSSION: Our study reveals a statistically significant improvement over the past thirteen years in the use of uniform drowning terminology in peer-reviewed scientific literature, although year-to-year variability over the current study period does not yield an obvious trend. CONCLUSIONS: Of the articles reviewed during the 2010-2016 study period, 32% included outdated and non-uniform drowning terminology and definitions. While this reveals an absolute decrease of 11% as compared with the previous study period (2003-2010), there is still significant room for improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5513019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55130192017-07-19 The use of non-uniform drowning terminology: a follow-up study Schmidt, Andrew C. Sempsrott, Justin R. Szpilman, David Queiroga, Ana Catarina Davison, Matt S. Zeigler, Ryan J. McAlister, Sean J. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: In 2002, the World Congress on Drowning developed a uniform definition for drowning. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of “non-uniform drowning terminology” (NUDT) and “non-uniform drowning definitions” (NUDD) in peer-reviewed scientific literature from 2010 to 2016, and compare these findings with those from our unpublished study performing a similar analysis on literature from 2003 to 2010. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using drowning-specific search terms in Pubmed and Web of Science. Titles and abstracts published between July 2010 and January 2016 were screened for relevance to the study focus. Articles meeting screening criteria were reviewed for exclusion criteria to produce the final group of studies. These articles were reviewed by four reviewers for NUDT and NUDD. The Fisher exact test was used to determine any statistically significant changes. RESULTS: The final group of studies included 167 articles. A total of 53 articles (32%) utilized NUDT, with 100% of these including the term “near drowning”. The proportion of articles utilizing NUDT was significantly less than reported by our previous study (p < 0.05). In addition, 32% of the articles included a definition for drowning (uniform or non-uniform), with 15% of these utilizing NUDD. DISCUSSION: Our study reveals a statistically significant improvement over the past thirteen years in the use of uniform drowning terminology in peer-reviewed scientific literature, although year-to-year variability over the current study period does not yield an obvious trend. CONCLUSIONS: Of the articles reviewed during the 2010-2016 study period, 32% included outdated and non-uniform drowning terminology and definitions. While this reveals an absolute decrease of 11% as compared with the previous study period (2003-2010), there is still significant room for improvement. BioMed Central 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5513019/ /pubmed/28716063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0405-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schmidt, Andrew C.
Sempsrott, Justin R.
Szpilman, David
Queiroga, Ana Catarina
Davison, Matt S.
Zeigler, Ryan J.
McAlister, Sean J.
The use of non-uniform drowning terminology: a follow-up study
title The use of non-uniform drowning terminology: a follow-up study
title_full The use of non-uniform drowning terminology: a follow-up study
title_fullStr The use of non-uniform drowning terminology: a follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed The use of non-uniform drowning terminology: a follow-up study
title_short The use of non-uniform drowning terminology: a follow-up study
title_sort use of non-uniform drowning terminology: a follow-up study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0405-x
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtandrewc theuseofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT sempsrottjustinr theuseofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT szpilmandavid theuseofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT queirogaanacatarina theuseofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT davisonmatts theuseofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT zeiglerryanj theuseofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT mcalisterseanj theuseofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT schmidtandrewc useofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT sempsrottjustinr useofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT szpilmandavid useofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT queirogaanacatarina useofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT davisonmatts useofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT zeiglerryanj useofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy
AT mcalisterseanj useofnonuniformdrowningterminologyafollowupstudy