Cargando…
Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
BACKGROUND: A 12-week, double-blind, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial in 316 adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for drug therapy guidance. METHODS: Patients with a CGI-S ≥ 4 and requiring...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28705252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1412-1 |
_version_ | 1783250580277297152 |
---|---|
author | Pérez, Víctor Salavert, Ariana Espadaler, Jordi Tuson, Miquel Saiz-Ruiz, Jerónimo Sáez-Navarro, Cristina Bobes, Julio Baca-García, Enrique Vieta, Eduard Olivares, José M. Rodriguez-Jimenez, Roberto Villagrán, José M. Gascón, Josep Cañete-Crespillo, Josep Solé, Montse Saiz, Pilar A. Ibáñez, Ángela de Diego-Adeliño, Javier Menchón, José M. |
author_facet | Pérez, Víctor Salavert, Ariana Espadaler, Jordi Tuson, Miquel Saiz-Ruiz, Jerónimo Sáez-Navarro, Cristina Bobes, Julio Baca-García, Enrique Vieta, Eduard Olivares, José M. Rodriguez-Jimenez, Roberto Villagrán, José M. Gascón, Josep Cañete-Crespillo, Josep Solé, Montse Saiz, Pilar A. Ibáñez, Ángela de Diego-Adeliño, Javier Menchón, José M. |
author_sort | Pérez, Víctor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A 12-week, double-blind, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial in 316 adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for drug therapy guidance. METHODS: Patients with a CGI-S ≥ 4 and requiring antidepressant medication de novo or changes in their medication regime were recruited at 18 Spanish public hospitals, genotyped with a commercial PGx panel (Neuropharmagen®), and randomized to PGx-guided treatment (n = 155) or treatment as usual (TAU, control group, n = 161), using a computer-generated random list that locked or unlocked psychiatrist access to the results of the PGx panel depending on group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a sustained response (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, PGI-I ≤ 2) within the 12-week follow-up. Patients and interviewers collecting the PGI-I ratings were blinded to group allocation. Between-group differences were evaluated using χ2-test or t-test, as per data type. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty patients were available for analysis at the end of the 12-week follow-up (PGx n = 136, TAU n = 144). A difference in sustained response within the study period (primary outcome) was not observed (38.5% vs 34.4%, p = 0.4735; OR = 1.19 [95%CI 0.74-1.92]), but the PGx-guided treatment group had a higher responder rate compared to TAU at 12 weeks (47.8% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0476; OR = 1.62 [95%CI 1.00-2.61]), and this difference increased after removing subjects in the PGx-guided group when clinicians explicitly reported not to follow the test recommendations (51.3% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0135; OR = 1.86 [95%CI 1.13-3.05]). Effects were more consistent in patients with 1–3 failed drug trials. In subjects reporting side effects burden at baseline, odds of achieving a better tolerability (Frequency, Intensity and Burden of Side Effects Rating Burden subscore ≤2) were higher in the PGx-guided group than in controls at 6 weeks and maintained at 12 weeks (68.5% vs 51.4%, p = 0.0260; OR = 2.06 [95%CI 1.09-3.89]). CONCLUSIONS: PGx-guided treatment resulted in significant improvement of MDD patient’s response at 12 weeks, dependent on the number of previously failed medication trials, but not on sustained response during the study period. Burden of side effects was also significantly reduced. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Clinical Trials Database 2013-002228-18, registration date September 16, 2013; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02529462, retrospectively registered: August 19, 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1412-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5513031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55130312017-07-19 Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial Pérez, Víctor Salavert, Ariana Espadaler, Jordi Tuson, Miquel Saiz-Ruiz, Jerónimo Sáez-Navarro, Cristina Bobes, Julio Baca-García, Enrique Vieta, Eduard Olivares, José M. Rodriguez-Jimenez, Roberto Villagrán, José M. Gascón, Josep Cañete-Crespillo, Josep Solé, Montse Saiz, Pilar A. Ibáñez, Ángela de Diego-Adeliño, Javier Menchón, José M. BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: A 12-week, double-blind, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial in 316 adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for drug therapy guidance. METHODS: Patients with a CGI-S ≥ 4 and requiring antidepressant medication de novo or changes in their medication regime were recruited at 18 Spanish public hospitals, genotyped with a commercial PGx panel (Neuropharmagen®), and randomized to PGx-guided treatment (n = 155) or treatment as usual (TAU, control group, n = 161), using a computer-generated random list that locked or unlocked psychiatrist access to the results of the PGx panel depending on group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a sustained response (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, PGI-I ≤ 2) within the 12-week follow-up. Patients and interviewers collecting the PGI-I ratings were blinded to group allocation. Between-group differences were evaluated using χ2-test or t-test, as per data type. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty patients were available for analysis at the end of the 12-week follow-up (PGx n = 136, TAU n = 144). A difference in sustained response within the study period (primary outcome) was not observed (38.5% vs 34.4%, p = 0.4735; OR = 1.19 [95%CI 0.74-1.92]), but the PGx-guided treatment group had a higher responder rate compared to TAU at 12 weeks (47.8% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0476; OR = 1.62 [95%CI 1.00-2.61]), and this difference increased after removing subjects in the PGx-guided group when clinicians explicitly reported not to follow the test recommendations (51.3% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0135; OR = 1.86 [95%CI 1.13-3.05]). Effects were more consistent in patients with 1–3 failed drug trials. In subjects reporting side effects burden at baseline, odds of achieving a better tolerability (Frequency, Intensity and Burden of Side Effects Rating Burden subscore ≤2) were higher in the PGx-guided group than in controls at 6 weeks and maintained at 12 weeks (68.5% vs 51.4%, p = 0.0260; OR = 2.06 [95%CI 1.09-3.89]). CONCLUSIONS: PGx-guided treatment resulted in significant improvement of MDD patient’s response at 12 weeks, dependent on the number of previously failed medication trials, but not on sustained response during the study period. Burden of side effects was also significantly reduced. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Clinical Trials Database 2013-002228-18, registration date September 16, 2013; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02529462, retrospectively registered: August 19, 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1412-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5513031/ /pubmed/28705252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1412-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pérez, Víctor Salavert, Ariana Espadaler, Jordi Tuson, Miquel Saiz-Ruiz, Jerónimo Sáez-Navarro, Cristina Bobes, Julio Baca-García, Enrique Vieta, Eduard Olivares, José M. Rodriguez-Jimenez, Roberto Villagrán, José M. Gascón, Josep Cañete-Crespillo, Josep Solé, Montse Saiz, Pilar A. Ibáñez, Ángela de Diego-Adeliño, Javier Menchón, José M. Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial |
title | Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial |
title_full | Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial |
title_short | Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial |
title_sort | efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28705252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1412-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perezvictor efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT salavertariana efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT espadalerjordi efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT tusonmiquel efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT saizruizjeronimo efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT saeznavarrocristina efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT bobesjulio efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT bacagarciaenrique efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT vietaeduard efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT olivaresjosem efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT rodriguezjimenezroberto efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT villagranjosem efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT gasconjosep efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT canetecrespillojosep efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT solemontse efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT saizpilara efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT ibanezangela efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT dediegoadelinojavier efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT menchonjosem efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial |