Cargando…
Clarifying the distinction between case series and cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies: potential impact on body of evidence and workload
Distinguishing cohort studies from case series is difficult. We propose a conceptualization of cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies. The main aim of this conceptualization is to clarify the distinction between cohort studies and case series. We discuss the potential impact of...
Autores principales: | Mathes, Tim, Pieper, Dawid |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0391-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Delusions and prediction error: clarifying the roles of behavioural and brain responses
por: Corlett, Philip Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Personal genome testing: Test characteristics to clarify the discourse on ethical, legal and societal issues
por: Bunnik, Eline M, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Clarifying how to deploy the public interest criterion in consent waivers for health data and tissue research
por: Schaefer, G. Owen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2019)