Cargando…

Demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in Tanzania: results from a choice experiment

BACKGROUND: Universal coverage campaigns for long-lasting insecticide-treated nets do not always reach the goal of one net for every two household members, and even when ownership of at least one net per household is high, many households may not own enough nets. The retail market provides these hou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gingrich, Chris D., Ricotta, Emily, Kahwa, Amos, Kahabuka, Catherine, Koenker, Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28705241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1929-2
_version_ 1783250602324656128
author Gingrich, Chris D.
Ricotta, Emily
Kahwa, Amos
Kahabuka, Catherine
Koenker, Hannah
author_facet Gingrich, Chris D.
Ricotta, Emily
Kahwa, Amos
Kahabuka, Catherine
Koenker, Hannah
author_sort Gingrich, Chris D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Universal coverage campaigns for long-lasting insecticide-treated nets do not always reach the goal of one net for every two household members, and even when ownership of at least one net per household is high, many households may not own enough nets. The retail market provides these households options for replacing or increasing the number of nets they own with products that best fit their needs since a variety of net shapes, sizes, and colours are available. Hence, it is important to understand the factors affecting private net demand. This study explores private demand for nets in Tanzania using a discrete choice experiment. The experiment provides participants the option to buy nets with their own money, and thus should prove more accurate than a hypothetical survey of net preferences. RESULTS: Nearly 800 participants sampled in two regions showed an overall strong demand for nets, with 40% choosing to buy a net across all seven combinations of net prices and characteristics such as size, shape, and insecticide treatment. Only 8% of all participants chose not to buy a single net. A key factor influencing demand was whether a participant’s household currently owned sufficient nets for all members, with rural participants showing lower net coverage and greater demand than urban participants. Both poor and less poor households showed strong evidence of making purchase decisions based on more than price alone. Mean willingness-to-pay values for a net started at US$1.10 and grew by US$0.50–1.40 for various attributes such as rectangular shape, large size, and insecticide treatment. The impact of price on demand was negative but small, with elasticity values between −0.25 and −0.45. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that private demand for nets in Tanzania could potentially supplement future coverage campaigns. Net manufacturers and retailers should advertise and promote consumers’ preferred net attributes to improve sales and further expand net access and coverage. To overcome household liquidity concerns and best replicate the experiment results, policy makers should consider making credit available for interested buyers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5513126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55131262017-07-19 Demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in Tanzania: results from a choice experiment Gingrich, Chris D. Ricotta, Emily Kahwa, Amos Kahabuka, Catherine Koenker, Hannah Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Universal coverage campaigns for long-lasting insecticide-treated nets do not always reach the goal of one net for every two household members, and even when ownership of at least one net per household is high, many households may not own enough nets. The retail market provides these households options for replacing or increasing the number of nets they own with products that best fit their needs since a variety of net shapes, sizes, and colours are available. Hence, it is important to understand the factors affecting private net demand. This study explores private demand for nets in Tanzania using a discrete choice experiment. The experiment provides participants the option to buy nets with their own money, and thus should prove more accurate than a hypothetical survey of net preferences. RESULTS: Nearly 800 participants sampled in two regions showed an overall strong demand for nets, with 40% choosing to buy a net across all seven combinations of net prices and characteristics such as size, shape, and insecticide treatment. Only 8% of all participants chose not to buy a single net. A key factor influencing demand was whether a participant’s household currently owned sufficient nets for all members, with rural participants showing lower net coverage and greater demand than urban participants. Both poor and less poor households showed strong evidence of making purchase decisions based on more than price alone. Mean willingness-to-pay values for a net started at US$1.10 and grew by US$0.50–1.40 for various attributes such as rectangular shape, large size, and insecticide treatment. The impact of price on demand was negative but small, with elasticity values between −0.25 and −0.45. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that private demand for nets in Tanzania could potentially supplement future coverage campaigns. Net manufacturers and retailers should advertise and promote consumers’ preferred net attributes to improve sales and further expand net access and coverage. To overcome household liquidity concerns and best replicate the experiment results, policy makers should consider making credit available for interested buyers. BioMed Central 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5513126/ /pubmed/28705241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1929-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gingrich, Chris D.
Ricotta, Emily
Kahwa, Amos
Kahabuka, Catherine
Koenker, Hannah
Demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in Tanzania: results from a choice experiment
title Demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in Tanzania: results from a choice experiment
title_full Demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in Tanzania: results from a choice experiment
title_fullStr Demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in Tanzania: results from a choice experiment
title_full_unstemmed Demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in Tanzania: results from a choice experiment
title_short Demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in Tanzania: results from a choice experiment
title_sort demand and willingness-to-pay for bed nets in tanzania: results from a choice experiment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28705241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1929-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gingrichchrisd demandandwillingnesstopayforbednetsintanzaniaresultsfromachoiceexperiment
AT ricottaemily demandandwillingnesstopayforbednetsintanzaniaresultsfromachoiceexperiment
AT kahwaamos demandandwillingnesstopayforbednetsintanzaniaresultsfromachoiceexperiment
AT kahabukacatherine demandandwillingnesstopayforbednetsintanzaniaresultsfromachoiceexperiment
AT koenkerhannah demandandwillingnesstopayforbednetsintanzaniaresultsfromachoiceexperiment