Cargando…
Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies
BACKGROUND: Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) implementation is monitored globally, but not much is known about what works well, where and why in scaling up. We reviewed a series of country case studies in order to determine whether and to what extent these countries have implemented t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1405-6 |
_version_ | 1783250606888058880 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Helen Ameh, Charles Roos, Natalie Mathai, Matthews Broek, Nynke van den |
author_facet | Smith, Helen Ameh, Charles Roos, Natalie Mathai, Matthews Broek, Nynke van den |
author_sort | Smith, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) implementation is monitored globally, but not much is known about what works well, where and why in scaling up. We reviewed a series of country case studies in order to determine whether and to what extent these countries have implemented the four essential components of MDSR and identify lessons for improving implementation. METHODS: A secondary analysis of ten case studies from countries at different stages of MDSR implementation, using a policy analysis framework to draw out lessons learnt and opportunities for improvement. We identify the consistent drivers of success in countries with well-established systems for MDSR, and common barriers in countries were Maternal Death Review (MDR) systems have been less successful. RESULTS: MDR is accepted and ongoing at subnational level in many countries, but it is not adequately institutionalised and the shift from facility based MDR to continuous MDSR that informs the wider health system still needs to be made. Our secondary analysis of country experiences highlights the need for a) social and team processes at facility level, for example the existence of a ‘no shame, no blame’ culture, and the ability to reflect on practice and manage change as a team for recommendations to be acted upon, b) health system inputs including adequate funding and reliable health information systems to enable identification and analysis of cases c) national level coordination of dissemination, and monitoring implementation of recommendations at all levels and d) mandatory notification of maternal deaths (and enforcement of this) and a professional requirement to participate in MDRs. CONCLUSIONS: Case studies from countries with established MDSR systems can provide valuable guidance on ways to set up the processes and overcome some of the barriers; but the challenge, as with many health system interventions, is to find a way to provide catalytic assistance and strengthen capacity for MDSR such that this becomes embedded in the health system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5513145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55131452017-07-19 Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies Smith, Helen Ameh, Charles Roos, Natalie Mathai, Matthews Broek, Nynke van den BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) implementation is monitored globally, but not much is known about what works well, where and why in scaling up. We reviewed a series of country case studies in order to determine whether and to what extent these countries have implemented the four essential components of MDSR and identify lessons for improving implementation. METHODS: A secondary analysis of ten case studies from countries at different stages of MDSR implementation, using a policy analysis framework to draw out lessons learnt and opportunities for improvement. We identify the consistent drivers of success in countries with well-established systems for MDSR, and common barriers in countries were Maternal Death Review (MDR) systems have been less successful. RESULTS: MDR is accepted and ongoing at subnational level in many countries, but it is not adequately institutionalised and the shift from facility based MDR to continuous MDSR that informs the wider health system still needs to be made. Our secondary analysis of country experiences highlights the need for a) social and team processes at facility level, for example the existence of a ‘no shame, no blame’ culture, and the ability to reflect on practice and manage change as a team for recommendations to be acted upon, b) health system inputs including adequate funding and reliable health information systems to enable identification and analysis of cases c) national level coordination of dissemination, and monitoring implementation of recommendations at all levels and d) mandatory notification of maternal deaths (and enforcement of this) and a professional requirement to participate in MDRs. CONCLUSIONS: Case studies from countries with established MDSR systems can provide valuable guidance on ways to set up the processes and overcome some of the barriers; but the challenge, as with many health system interventions, is to find a way to provide catalytic assistance and strengthen capacity for MDSR such that this becomes embedded in the health system. BioMed Central 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5513145/ /pubmed/28716124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1405-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Smith, Helen Ameh, Charles Roos, Natalie Mathai, Matthews Broek, Nynke van den Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies |
title | Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies |
title_full | Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies |
title_fullStr | Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies |
title_short | Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies |
title_sort | implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1405-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithhelen implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies AT amehcharles implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies AT roosnatalie implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies AT mathaimatthews implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies AT broeknynkevanden implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies |