Cargando…

Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies

BACKGROUND: Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) implementation is monitored globally, but not much is known about what works well, where and why in scaling up. We reviewed a series of country case studies in order to determine whether and to what extent these countries have implemented t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Helen, Ameh, Charles, Roos, Natalie, Mathai, Matthews, Broek, Nynke van den
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1405-6
_version_ 1783250606888058880
author Smith, Helen
Ameh, Charles
Roos, Natalie
Mathai, Matthews
Broek, Nynke van den
author_facet Smith, Helen
Ameh, Charles
Roos, Natalie
Mathai, Matthews
Broek, Nynke van den
author_sort Smith, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) implementation is monitored globally, but not much is known about what works well, where and why in scaling up. We reviewed a series of country case studies in order to determine whether and to what extent these countries have implemented the four essential components of MDSR and identify lessons for improving implementation. METHODS: A secondary analysis of ten case studies from countries at different stages of MDSR implementation, using a policy analysis framework to draw out lessons learnt and opportunities for improvement. We identify the consistent drivers of success in countries with well-established systems for MDSR, and common barriers in countries were Maternal Death Review (MDR) systems have been less successful. RESULTS: MDR is accepted and ongoing at subnational level in many countries, but it is not adequately institutionalised and the shift from facility based MDR to continuous MDSR that informs the wider health system still needs to be made. Our secondary analysis of country experiences highlights the need for a) social and team processes at facility level, for example the existence of a ‘no shame, no blame’ culture, and the ability to reflect on practice and manage change as a team for recommendations to be acted upon, b) health system inputs including adequate funding and reliable health information systems to enable identification and analysis of cases c) national level coordination of dissemination, and monitoring implementation of recommendations at all levels and d) mandatory notification of maternal deaths (and enforcement of this) and a professional requirement to participate in MDRs. CONCLUSIONS: Case studies from countries with established MDSR systems can provide valuable guidance on ways to set up the processes and overcome some of the barriers; but the challenge, as with many health system interventions, is to find a way to provide catalytic assistance and strengthen capacity for MDSR such that this becomes embedded in the health system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5513145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55131452017-07-19 Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies Smith, Helen Ameh, Charles Roos, Natalie Mathai, Matthews Broek, Nynke van den BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) implementation is monitored globally, but not much is known about what works well, where and why in scaling up. We reviewed a series of country case studies in order to determine whether and to what extent these countries have implemented the four essential components of MDSR and identify lessons for improving implementation. METHODS: A secondary analysis of ten case studies from countries at different stages of MDSR implementation, using a policy analysis framework to draw out lessons learnt and opportunities for improvement. We identify the consistent drivers of success in countries with well-established systems for MDSR, and common barriers in countries were Maternal Death Review (MDR) systems have been less successful. RESULTS: MDR is accepted and ongoing at subnational level in many countries, but it is not adequately institutionalised and the shift from facility based MDR to continuous MDSR that informs the wider health system still needs to be made. Our secondary analysis of country experiences highlights the need for a) social and team processes at facility level, for example the existence of a ‘no shame, no blame’ culture, and the ability to reflect on practice and manage change as a team for recommendations to be acted upon, b) health system inputs including adequate funding and reliable health information systems to enable identification and analysis of cases c) national level coordination of dissemination, and monitoring implementation of recommendations at all levels and d) mandatory notification of maternal deaths (and enforcement of this) and a professional requirement to participate in MDRs. CONCLUSIONS: Case studies from countries with established MDSR systems can provide valuable guidance on ways to set up the processes and overcome some of the barriers; but the challenge, as with many health system interventions, is to find a way to provide catalytic assistance and strengthen capacity for MDSR such that this becomes embedded in the health system. BioMed Central 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5513145/ /pubmed/28716124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1405-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Helen
Ameh, Charles
Roos, Natalie
Mathai, Matthews
Broek, Nynke van den
Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies
title Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies
title_full Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies
title_fullStr Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies
title_full_unstemmed Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies
title_short Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies
title_sort implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1405-6
work_keys_str_mv AT smithhelen implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies
AT amehcharles implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies
AT roosnatalie implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies
AT mathaimatthews implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies
AT broeknynkevanden implementingmaternaldeathsurveillanceandresponseareviewoflessonsfromcountrycasestudies