Cargando…
Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western Kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is crucial to prevent short term delivery risks and long term effects such as cardiovascular and metabolic diseases in the mother and infant. Diagnosing GDM in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) however, remains sub-optimal due to associated l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28705184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1415-4 |
_version_ | 1783250611828948992 |
---|---|
author | Pastakia, Sonak D. Njuguna, Benson Onyango, Beryl Ajwang’ Washington, Sierra Christoffersen-Deb, Astrid Kosgei, Wycliffe K Saravanan, Ponnusamy |
author_facet | Pastakia, Sonak D. Njuguna, Benson Onyango, Beryl Ajwang’ Washington, Sierra Christoffersen-Deb, Astrid Kosgei, Wycliffe K Saravanan, Ponnusamy |
author_sort | Pastakia, Sonak D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is crucial to prevent short term delivery risks and long term effects such as cardiovascular and metabolic diseases in the mother and infant. Diagnosing GDM in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) however, remains sub-optimal due to associated logistical and cost barriers for resource-constrained populations. A cost-effective strategy to screen for GDM in such settings are therefore urgently required. We conducted this study to determine the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and assess utility of various GDM point of care (POC) screening strategies in a resource-constrained setting. METHODS: Eligible women aged ≥18 years, and between 24 and 32 weeks of a singleton pregnancy, prospectively underwent testing over two days. On day 1, a POC 1-h 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) and a POC glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was assessed. On day 2, fasting blood glucose, 1-h and 2-h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were determined using both venous and POC tests, along with a venous HbA1c. The International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria was used to diagnose GDM. GDM prevalence was reported with 95% confidence interval (CI). Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the various POC testing strategies were determined using IADPSG testing as the standard reference. RESULTS: Six hundred-sixteen eligible women completed testing procedures. GDM was diagnosed in 18 women, a prevalence of 2.9% (95% CI, 1.57% - 4.23%). Compared to IADPSG testing, POC IADPSG had a sensitivity and specificity of 55.6% and 90.6% respectively while that of POC 1-h 50 g GCT (using a diagnostic cut-off of ≥7.2 mmol/L [129.6 mg/dL]) was 55.6% and 63.9%. All other POC tests assessed showed poor sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: POC screening strategies though feasible, showed poor sensitivity for GDM detection in our resource-constrained population of low GDM prevalence. Studies to identify sensitive and specific POC GDM screening strategies using adverse pregnancy outcomes as end points are required. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov: NCT02978807, Registered 29 November 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5513206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55132062017-07-19 Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western Kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods Pastakia, Sonak D. Njuguna, Benson Onyango, Beryl Ajwang’ Washington, Sierra Christoffersen-Deb, Astrid Kosgei, Wycliffe K Saravanan, Ponnusamy BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is crucial to prevent short term delivery risks and long term effects such as cardiovascular and metabolic diseases in the mother and infant. Diagnosing GDM in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) however, remains sub-optimal due to associated logistical and cost barriers for resource-constrained populations. A cost-effective strategy to screen for GDM in such settings are therefore urgently required. We conducted this study to determine the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and assess utility of various GDM point of care (POC) screening strategies in a resource-constrained setting. METHODS: Eligible women aged ≥18 years, and between 24 and 32 weeks of a singleton pregnancy, prospectively underwent testing over two days. On day 1, a POC 1-h 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) and a POC glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was assessed. On day 2, fasting blood glucose, 1-h and 2-h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were determined using both venous and POC tests, along with a venous HbA1c. The International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria was used to diagnose GDM. GDM prevalence was reported with 95% confidence interval (CI). Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the various POC testing strategies were determined using IADPSG testing as the standard reference. RESULTS: Six hundred-sixteen eligible women completed testing procedures. GDM was diagnosed in 18 women, a prevalence of 2.9% (95% CI, 1.57% - 4.23%). Compared to IADPSG testing, POC IADPSG had a sensitivity and specificity of 55.6% and 90.6% respectively while that of POC 1-h 50 g GCT (using a diagnostic cut-off of ≥7.2 mmol/L [129.6 mg/dL]) was 55.6% and 63.9%. All other POC tests assessed showed poor sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: POC screening strategies though feasible, showed poor sensitivity for GDM detection in our resource-constrained population of low GDM prevalence. Studies to identify sensitive and specific POC GDM screening strategies using adverse pregnancy outcomes as end points are required. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov: NCT02978807, Registered 29 November 2016. BioMed Central 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5513206/ /pubmed/28705184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1415-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pastakia, Sonak D. Njuguna, Benson Onyango, Beryl Ajwang’ Washington, Sierra Christoffersen-Deb, Astrid Kosgei, Wycliffe K Saravanan, Ponnusamy Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western Kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods |
title | Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western Kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods |
title_full | Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western Kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western Kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western Kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods |
title_short | Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western Kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods |
title_sort | prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28705184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1415-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pastakiasonakd prevalenceofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbasedonvariousscreeningstrategiesinwesternkenyaaprospectivecomparisonofpointofcarediagnosticmethods AT njugunabenson prevalenceofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbasedonvariousscreeningstrategiesinwesternkenyaaprospectivecomparisonofpointofcarediagnosticmethods AT onyangoberylajwang prevalenceofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbasedonvariousscreeningstrategiesinwesternkenyaaprospectivecomparisonofpointofcarediagnosticmethods AT washingtonsierra prevalenceofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbasedonvariousscreeningstrategiesinwesternkenyaaprospectivecomparisonofpointofcarediagnosticmethods AT christoffersendebastrid prevalenceofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbasedonvariousscreeningstrategiesinwesternkenyaaprospectivecomparisonofpointofcarediagnosticmethods AT kosgeiwycliffek prevalenceofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbasedonvariousscreeningstrategiesinwesternkenyaaprospectivecomparisonofpointofcarediagnosticmethods AT saravananponnusamy prevalenceofgestationaldiabetesmellitusbasedonvariousscreeningstrategiesinwesternkenyaaprospectivecomparisonofpointofcarediagnosticmethods |