Cargando…

A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to describe non-conveyance in ambulance care from patient-safety and ambulance professional perspectives. The review specifically focussed at describing (1) ambulance non-conveyance rates, (2) characteristics of non-conveyed patients, (3) follow-up care after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebben, Remco H.A., Vloet, Lilian C.M., Speijers, Renate F., Tönjes, Nico W., Loef, Jorik, Pelgrim, Thomas, Hoogeveen, Margreet, Berben, Sivera A.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6
_version_ 1783250612066975744
author Ebben, Remco H.A.
Vloet, Lilian C.M.
Speijers, Renate F.
Tönjes, Nico W.
Loef, Jorik
Pelgrim, Thomas
Hoogeveen, Margreet
Berben, Sivera A.A.
author_facet Ebben, Remco H.A.
Vloet, Lilian C.M.
Speijers, Renate F.
Tönjes, Nico W.
Loef, Jorik
Pelgrim, Thomas
Hoogeveen, Margreet
Berben, Sivera A.A.
author_sort Ebben, Remco H.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to describe non-conveyance in ambulance care from patient-safety and ambulance professional perspectives. The review specifically focussed at describing (1) ambulance non-conveyance rates, (2) characteristics of non-conveyed patients, (3) follow-up care after non-conveyance, (4) existing guidelines or protocols, and (5) influencing factors during the non-conveyance decision making process. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and reference lists of included articles, in June 2016. We included all types of peer-reviewed designs on the five topics. Couples of two independent reviewers performed the selection process, the quality assessment, and data extraction. RESULTS: We included 67 studies with low to moderate quality. Non-conveyance rates for general patient populations ranged from 3.7%–93.7%. Non-conveyed patients have a variety of initial complaints, common initial complaints are related to trauma and neurology. Furthermore, vulnerable patients groups as children and elderly are more represented in the non-conveyance population. Within 24 h–48 h after non-conveyance, 2.5%–6.1% of the patients have EMS representations, and 4.6–19.0% present themselves at the ED. Mortality rates vary from 0.2%–3.5% after 24 h, up to 0.3%–6.1% after 72 h. Criteria to guide non-conveyance decisions are vital signs, ingestion of drugs/alcohol, and level of consciousness. A limited amount of non-conveyance guidelines or protocols is available for general and specific patient populations. Factors influencing the non-conveyance decision are related to the professional (competencies, experience, intuition), the patient (health status, refusal, wishes and best interest), the healthcare system (access to general practitioner/other healthcare facilities/patient information), and supportive tools (online medical control, high risk card). CONCLUSIONS: Non-conveyance rates for general and specific patient populations vary. Patients in the non-conveyance population present themselves with a variety of initial complaints and conditions, common initial complaints or conditions are related to trauma and neurology. After non-conveyance, a proportion of patients re-enters the emergency healthcare system within 2 days. For ambulance professionals the non-conveyance decision-making process is complex and multifactorial. Competencies needed to perform non-conveyance are marginally described, and there is a limited amount of supportive tools is available for general and specific non-conveyance populations. This may compromise patient-safety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5513207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55132072017-07-19 A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review Ebben, Remco H.A. Vloet, Lilian C.M. Speijers, Renate F. Tönjes, Nico W. Loef, Jorik Pelgrim, Thomas Hoogeveen, Margreet Berben, Sivera A.A. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Review BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to describe non-conveyance in ambulance care from patient-safety and ambulance professional perspectives. The review specifically focussed at describing (1) ambulance non-conveyance rates, (2) characteristics of non-conveyed patients, (3) follow-up care after non-conveyance, (4) existing guidelines or protocols, and (5) influencing factors during the non-conveyance decision making process. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and reference lists of included articles, in June 2016. We included all types of peer-reviewed designs on the five topics. Couples of two independent reviewers performed the selection process, the quality assessment, and data extraction. RESULTS: We included 67 studies with low to moderate quality. Non-conveyance rates for general patient populations ranged from 3.7%–93.7%. Non-conveyed patients have a variety of initial complaints, common initial complaints are related to trauma and neurology. Furthermore, vulnerable patients groups as children and elderly are more represented in the non-conveyance population. Within 24 h–48 h after non-conveyance, 2.5%–6.1% of the patients have EMS representations, and 4.6–19.0% present themselves at the ED. Mortality rates vary from 0.2%–3.5% after 24 h, up to 0.3%–6.1% after 72 h. Criteria to guide non-conveyance decisions are vital signs, ingestion of drugs/alcohol, and level of consciousness. A limited amount of non-conveyance guidelines or protocols is available for general and specific patient populations. Factors influencing the non-conveyance decision are related to the professional (competencies, experience, intuition), the patient (health status, refusal, wishes and best interest), the healthcare system (access to general practitioner/other healthcare facilities/patient information), and supportive tools (online medical control, high risk card). CONCLUSIONS: Non-conveyance rates for general and specific patient populations vary. Patients in the non-conveyance population present themselves with a variety of initial complaints and conditions, common initial complaints or conditions are related to trauma and neurology. After non-conveyance, a proportion of patients re-enters the emergency healthcare system within 2 days. For ambulance professionals the non-conveyance decision-making process is complex and multifactorial. Competencies needed to perform non-conveyance are marginally described, and there is a limited amount of supportive tools is available for general and specific non-conveyance populations. This may compromise patient-safety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5513207/ /pubmed/28716132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Ebben, Remco H.A.
Vloet, Lilian C.M.
Speijers, Renate F.
Tönjes, Nico W.
Loef, Jorik
Pelgrim, Thomas
Hoogeveen, Margreet
Berben, Sivera A.A.
A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review
title A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review
title_full A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review
title_fullStr A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review
title_short A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review
title_sort patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ebbenremcoha apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT vloetliliancm apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT speijersrenatef apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT tonjesnicow apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT loefjorik apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT pelgrimthomas apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT hoogeveenmargreet apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT berbensiveraaa apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT ebbenremcoha patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT vloetliliancm patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT speijersrenatef patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT tonjesnicow patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT loefjorik patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT pelgrimthomas patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT hoogeveenmargreet patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview
AT berbensiveraaa patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview