Cargando…
A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to describe non-conveyance in ambulance care from patient-safety and ambulance professional perspectives. The review specifically focussed at describing (1) ambulance non-conveyance rates, (2) characteristics of non-conveyed patients, (3) follow-up care after...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6 |
_version_ | 1783250612066975744 |
---|---|
author | Ebben, Remco H.A. Vloet, Lilian C.M. Speijers, Renate F. Tönjes, Nico W. Loef, Jorik Pelgrim, Thomas Hoogeveen, Margreet Berben, Sivera A.A. |
author_facet | Ebben, Remco H.A. Vloet, Lilian C.M. Speijers, Renate F. Tönjes, Nico W. Loef, Jorik Pelgrim, Thomas Hoogeveen, Margreet Berben, Sivera A.A. |
author_sort | Ebben, Remco H.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to describe non-conveyance in ambulance care from patient-safety and ambulance professional perspectives. The review specifically focussed at describing (1) ambulance non-conveyance rates, (2) characteristics of non-conveyed patients, (3) follow-up care after non-conveyance, (4) existing guidelines or protocols, and (5) influencing factors during the non-conveyance decision making process. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and reference lists of included articles, in June 2016. We included all types of peer-reviewed designs on the five topics. Couples of two independent reviewers performed the selection process, the quality assessment, and data extraction. RESULTS: We included 67 studies with low to moderate quality. Non-conveyance rates for general patient populations ranged from 3.7%–93.7%. Non-conveyed patients have a variety of initial complaints, common initial complaints are related to trauma and neurology. Furthermore, vulnerable patients groups as children and elderly are more represented in the non-conveyance population. Within 24 h–48 h after non-conveyance, 2.5%–6.1% of the patients have EMS representations, and 4.6–19.0% present themselves at the ED. Mortality rates vary from 0.2%–3.5% after 24 h, up to 0.3%–6.1% after 72 h. Criteria to guide non-conveyance decisions are vital signs, ingestion of drugs/alcohol, and level of consciousness. A limited amount of non-conveyance guidelines or protocols is available for general and specific patient populations. Factors influencing the non-conveyance decision are related to the professional (competencies, experience, intuition), the patient (health status, refusal, wishes and best interest), the healthcare system (access to general practitioner/other healthcare facilities/patient information), and supportive tools (online medical control, high risk card). CONCLUSIONS: Non-conveyance rates for general and specific patient populations vary. Patients in the non-conveyance population present themselves with a variety of initial complaints and conditions, common initial complaints or conditions are related to trauma and neurology. After non-conveyance, a proportion of patients re-enters the emergency healthcare system within 2 days. For ambulance professionals the non-conveyance decision-making process is complex and multifactorial. Competencies needed to perform non-conveyance are marginally described, and there is a limited amount of supportive tools is available for general and specific non-conveyance populations. This may compromise patient-safety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5513207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55132072017-07-19 A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review Ebben, Remco H.A. Vloet, Lilian C.M. Speijers, Renate F. Tönjes, Nico W. Loef, Jorik Pelgrim, Thomas Hoogeveen, Margreet Berben, Sivera A.A. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Review BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to describe non-conveyance in ambulance care from patient-safety and ambulance professional perspectives. The review specifically focussed at describing (1) ambulance non-conveyance rates, (2) characteristics of non-conveyed patients, (3) follow-up care after non-conveyance, (4) existing guidelines or protocols, and (5) influencing factors during the non-conveyance decision making process. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and reference lists of included articles, in June 2016. We included all types of peer-reviewed designs on the five topics. Couples of two independent reviewers performed the selection process, the quality assessment, and data extraction. RESULTS: We included 67 studies with low to moderate quality. Non-conveyance rates for general patient populations ranged from 3.7%–93.7%. Non-conveyed patients have a variety of initial complaints, common initial complaints are related to trauma and neurology. Furthermore, vulnerable patients groups as children and elderly are more represented in the non-conveyance population. Within 24 h–48 h after non-conveyance, 2.5%–6.1% of the patients have EMS representations, and 4.6–19.0% present themselves at the ED. Mortality rates vary from 0.2%–3.5% after 24 h, up to 0.3%–6.1% after 72 h. Criteria to guide non-conveyance decisions are vital signs, ingestion of drugs/alcohol, and level of consciousness. A limited amount of non-conveyance guidelines or protocols is available for general and specific patient populations. Factors influencing the non-conveyance decision are related to the professional (competencies, experience, intuition), the patient (health status, refusal, wishes and best interest), the healthcare system (access to general practitioner/other healthcare facilities/patient information), and supportive tools (online medical control, high risk card). CONCLUSIONS: Non-conveyance rates for general and specific patient populations vary. Patients in the non-conveyance population present themselves with a variety of initial complaints and conditions, common initial complaints or conditions are related to trauma and neurology. After non-conveyance, a proportion of patients re-enters the emergency healthcare system within 2 days. For ambulance professionals the non-conveyance decision-making process is complex and multifactorial. Competencies needed to perform non-conveyance are marginally described, and there is a limited amount of supportive tools is available for general and specific non-conveyance populations. This may compromise patient-safety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5513207/ /pubmed/28716132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Ebben, Remco H.A. Vloet, Lilian C.M. Speijers, Renate F. Tönjes, Nico W. Loef, Jorik Pelgrim, Thomas Hoogeveen, Margreet Berben, Sivera A.A. A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review |
title | A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review |
title_full | A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review |
title_short | A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review |
title_sort | patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28716132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebbenremcoha apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT vloetliliancm apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT speijersrenatef apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT tonjesnicow apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT loefjorik apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT pelgrimthomas apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT hoogeveenmargreet apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT berbensiveraaa apatientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT ebbenremcoha patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT vloetliliancm patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT speijersrenatef patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT tonjesnicow patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT loefjorik patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT pelgrimthomas patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT hoogeveenmargreet patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview AT berbensiveraaa patientsafetyandprofessionalperspectiveonnonconveyanceinambulancecareasystematicreview |