Cargando…
Peto’s Paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention?
The risk of developing cancer should theoretically increase with both the number of cells and the lifespan of an organism. However, gigantic animals do not get more cancer than humans, suggesting that super-human cancer suppression has evolved numerous times across the tree of life. This is the esse...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28705195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0401-7 |
_version_ | 1783250641317003264 |
---|---|
author | Tollis, Marc Boddy, Amy M. Maley, Carlo C. |
author_facet | Tollis, Marc Boddy, Amy M. Maley, Carlo C. |
author_sort | Tollis, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | The risk of developing cancer should theoretically increase with both the number of cells and the lifespan of an organism. However, gigantic animals do not get more cancer than humans, suggesting that super-human cancer suppression has evolved numerous times across the tree of life. This is the essence and promise of Peto’s Paradox. We discuss what is known about Peto’s Paradox and provide hints of what is yet to be discovered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5513346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55133462017-07-19 Peto’s Paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention? Tollis, Marc Boddy, Amy M. Maley, Carlo C. BMC Biol Question and Answer The risk of developing cancer should theoretically increase with both the number of cells and the lifespan of an organism. However, gigantic animals do not get more cancer than humans, suggesting that super-human cancer suppression has evolved numerous times across the tree of life. This is the essence and promise of Peto’s Paradox. We discuss what is known about Peto’s Paradox and provide hints of what is yet to be discovered. BioMed Central 2017-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5513346/ /pubmed/28705195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0401-7 Text en © Maley et al. 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Question and Answer Tollis, Marc Boddy, Amy M. Maley, Carlo C. Peto’s Paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention? |
title | Peto’s Paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention? |
title_full | Peto’s Paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention? |
title_fullStr | Peto’s Paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention? |
title_full_unstemmed | Peto’s Paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention? |
title_short | Peto’s Paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention? |
title_sort | peto’s paradox: how has evolution solved the problem of cancer prevention? |
topic | Question and Answer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28705195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0401-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tollismarc petosparadoxhowhasevolutionsolvedtheproblemofcancerprevention AT boddyamym petosparadoxhowhasevolutionsolvedtheproblemofcancerprevention AT maleycarloc petosparadoxhowhasevolutionsolvedtheproblemofcancerprevention |