Cargando…
Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes
Bridging nerve gaps with suitable grafts is a major clinical problem. The autologous nerve graft is considered to be the gold standard, providing the best functional results; however, donor site morbidity is still a major disadvantage. Various attempts have been made to overcome the problems of auto...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513382/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041480 |
_version_ | 1783250649804177408 |
---|---|
author | Stang, Felix Keilhoff, Gerburg Fansa, Hisham |
author_facet | Stang, Felix Keilhoff, Gerburg Fansa, Hisham |
author_sort | Stang, Felix |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bridging nerve gaps with suitable grafts is a major clinical problem. The autologous nerve graft is considered to be the gold standard, providing the best functional results; however, donor site morbidity is still a major disadvantage. Various attempts have been made to overcome the problems of autologous nerve grafts with artificial nerve tubes, which are “ready-to-use” in almost every situation. A wide range of materials have been used in animal models but only few have been applied to date clinically, where biocompatibility is an inevitable prerequisite. This review gives an idea about artificial nerve tubes with special focus on their biocompatibility in animals and humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5513382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55133822017-07-28 Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes Stang, Felix Keilhoff, Gerburg Fansa, Hisham Materials (Basel) Review Bridging nerve gaps with suitable grafts is a major clinical problem. The autologous nerve graft is considered to be the gold standard, providing the best functional results; however, donor site morbidity is still a major disadvantage. Various attempts have been made to overcome the problems of autologous nerve grafts with artificial nerve tubes, which are “ready-to-use” in almost every situation. A wide range of materials have been used in animal models but only few have been applied to date clinically, where biocompatibility is an inevitable prerequisite. This review gives an idea about artificial nerve tubes with special focus on their biocompatibility in animals and humans. Molecular Diversity Preservation International 2009-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5513382/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041480 Text en © 2009 by the authors. Licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Stang, Felix Keilhoff, Gerburg Fansa, Hisham Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes |
title | Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes |
title_full | Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes |
title_fullStr | Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes |
title_full_unstemmed | Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes |
title_short | Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes |
title_sort | biocompatibility of different nerve tubes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513382/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stangfelix biocompatibilityofdifferentnervetubes AT keilhoffgerburg biocompatibilityofdifferentnervetubes AT fansahisham biocompatibilityofdifferentnervetubes |