Cargando…

Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes

Bridging nerve gaps with suitable grafts is a major clinical problem. The autologous nerve graft is considered to be the gold standard, providing the best functional results; however, donor site morbidity is still a major disadvantage. Various attempts have been made to overcome the problems of auto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stang, Felix, Keilhoff, Gerburg, Fansa, Hisham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513382/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041480
_version_ 1783250649804177408
author Stang, Felix
Keilhoff, Gerburg
Fansa, Hisham
author_facet Stang, Felix
Keilhoff, Gerburg
Fansa, Hisham
author_sort Stang, Felix
collection PubMed
description Bridging nerve gaps with suitable grafts is a major clinical problem. The autologous nerve graft is considered to be the gold standard, providing the best functional results; however, donor site morbidity is still a major disadvantage. Various attempts have been made to overcome the problems of autologous nerve grafts with artificial nerve tubes, which are “ready-to-use” in almost every situation. A wide range of materials have been used in animal models but only few have been applied to date clinically, where biocompatibility is an inevitable prerequisite. This review gives an idea about artificial nerve tubes with special focus on their biocompatibility in animals and humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5513382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55133822017-07-28 Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes Stang, Felix Keilhoff, Gerburg Fansa, Hisham Materials (Basel) Review Bridging nerve gaps with suitable grafts is a major clinical problem. The autologous nerve graft is considered to be the gold standard, providing the best functional results; however, donor site morbidity is still a major disadvantage. Various attempts have been made to overcome the problems of autologous nerve grafts with artificial nerve tubes, which are “ready-to-use” in almost every situation. A wide range of materials have been used in animal models but only few have been applied to date clinically, where biocompatibility is an inevitable prerequisite. This review gives an idea about artificial nerve tubes with special focus on their biocompatibility in animals and humans. Molecular Diversity Preservation International 2009-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5513382/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041480 Text en © 2009 by the authors. Licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Stang, Felix
Keilhoff, Gerburg
Fansa, Hisham
Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes
title Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes
title_full Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes
title_fullStr Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes
title_short Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes
title_sort biocompatibility of different nerve tubes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5513382/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma2041480
work_keys_str_mv AT stangfelix biocompatibilityofdifferentnervetubes
AT keilhoffgerburg biocompatibilityofdifferentnervetubes
AT fansahisham biocompatibilityofdifferentnervetubes